Taperssection.com

Gear / Technical Help => Post-Processing, Computer / Streaming / Internet Devices & Related Activity => Topic started by: caymanreview on June 21, 2004, 12:39:06 AM

Title: Win2K optimization for audio
Post by: caymanreview on June 21, 2004, 12:39:06 AM

saw this on the oade board, there was some stuff i wasnt aware of, so i thought it should be posted here... good stuff here!

http://www.oade.com/Tapers_Section/Forum/dcboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=105&topic_id=217&mesg_id=217&page=

Title: Re: Win2K optimization for audio
Post by: sygdwm on June 21, 2004, 01:03:11 AM

this should be in the archive section if its not already. +t for that sweet find. time to reload and "demo" wavelab5! ;D

Title: Re: Win2K optimization for audio
Post by: caymanreview on June 21, 2004, 04:41:42 AM

definantly stuff for the archive. also right next to it on that page is 98se optimization steps

im gonna do a full restore on my picturebook and follow these steps to a "T"

Title: Re: Win2K optimization for audio
Post by: caymanreview on June 21, 2004, 09:50:27 AM

so i did this, and basically it FUCKED my 2kpro up bad

i was having zero problems without doing this stuff

i had to totally re-install 2kpro to get rid of that shit!

Title: Re: Win2K optimization for audio
Post by: nic on June 22, 2004, 12:10:53 PM

I keep seeing documents like this saying to use FAT32, but I just don't understand it.
real-life experience has told me many times over that FAT(12/16/32) is a piece of CRAP!

NTFS does not take longer to defrag compared to FAT32 on the same size hard-disc, it takes much less time to defrag compared to FAT32.
as far as FAT32 being faster for disc access, that may be so, but I have to yet to have any problems working with 12+ channels of multitrack audio on a NTFS drive.