Taperssection.com

Gear / Technical Help => Post-Processing, Computer / Streaming / Internet Devices & Related Activity => Topic started by: mfisch on May 16, 2005, 03:39:16 PM

Title: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: mfisch on May 16, 2005, 03:39:16 PM
must support 10.4 audio @ 24/96
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: not logged in on May 16, 2005, 03:52:17 PM
must support 10.4 audio @ 24/96

that rules out peak for the time being.

bias says it will release a full-tiger compatible update for peak this month.

http://www.bias-inc.com/about/pressRoom/2005-3.php
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: mfisch on May 16, 2005, 07:25:57 PM
feel free to vote peak anyway ..... I can wait a few days =)
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: mfisch on May 20, 2005, 12:16:19 AM
Anyone else have input?

Why dont I see cubase or logical pro mentioned by anyone? I'd like to do matrices at 3-10 tracks, I see some of these software options only take two channels.
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: MattD on May 20, 2005, 12:19:15 AM
I'd say spark, but I'm doubting that's Tiger-compatible. I haven't tried, so I don't know.
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: nic on May 20, 2005, 12:29:30 AM
I'd say spark, but I'm doubting that's Tiger-compatible. I haven't tried, so I don't know.

I havent tried recording w/ Spark in Tiger, but it edits and saves wav/aiff files fine.
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: wbrisette on May 20, 2005, 03:14:59 PM
Anyone else have input?

Why dont I see cubase or logical pro mentioned by anyone? I'd like to do matrices at 3-10 tracks, I see some of these software options only take two channels.

I've voted other. My favorite is Digital Performer. Kick the crap out of Logic both in interface and ease of use. Emagic/Apple claims Logic sounds better than the competition, but I think they've hit the marketing kool-aid one too many times. I've used and own both and they sound the freakin' same. I only updated Logic so I could get my favorite CD editing application back (WaveBurner), but what Apple did to that program is inexcusable. It's a total Piece of crap now. I haven't ordered the update, which supposedly fixes a few things, but it's still a former shadow of itself. It use to rule the CD mastering world, now WaveBurner can barely burn CDs that replicators like.

I'm really looking forward to Peak 5, maybe then I'll go back to enjoying Peak as a matering application. Still going to need and use MOTU's Digital Performer, but there will be nice options for CD and DVD mastering.

Wayne
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: mfisch on May 20, 2005, 04:03:20 PM
Digital performer, where do you buy this? I only see upgrades...
Spark is deprecated.
Peak hasnt been released yet (but its only stereo anyway). Deck doesnt do 24bit?
Felttip, only stereo again.

Steinberg Cubase looks good 24/96 up to 48 tracks, anyone know whats wrong with it? SE is only $99?

Apple Logic Express at $299 will do 24/96 up to 12 tracks. ouch $299

Do I really have any other choices for multitracking 24/96 besides Logic Express and Cubase SE?
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: Steve J on May 20, 2005, 05:30:14 PM
Digital performer, where do you buy this? I only see upgrades...

There are a number of resellers online for Digital Performer 4.5. I know Sweetwater has it for around $500; so you can kind of use that as the starting point for shopping: I'm sure some outfit is probably selling it for less. I've seen academic discounts for the full version of DP 4.5 at around $320 (about the same as the competitive upgrade). I really want to get my hands on DP; but I'll have to wait a month or so to squeak the extra $$$ into the budget.
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: mfisch on May 20, 2005, 05:40:59 PM
It looks like Cubase SE only does 8 tracks for $99.

Any reason for me to spend $500 on DP if Im only working with 8 tracks? Im looking strictly to master a live performance (board patch and mics), and sync if necessary.

Do any of these softwares have recording time limitations? Im assuming they dont record straight to standard wave.
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: MattD on May 20, 2005, 07:13:27 PM
DP4 has a 2 GB limit last I checked, but I never made it to 4.5. I think I was at 4.01 or something when I used it.
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: nic on May 20, 2005, 07:29:00 PM
DP4 has a 2 GB limit last I checked, but I never made it to 4.5. I think I was at 4.01 or something when I used it.

while it does have the 2gb limit, each channel is its own seperate file, so you can run twice as long as compared to a recording program that only records "stereo" files
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: kennedy on May 20, 2005, 09:37:55 PM
i use sound studio 2.1, but it sucks
go with pro tools if possible, had a chance to play around with it, great program  :)
i plan to upgrade one of these days, who's got my kickdown?
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: scb on May 21, 2005, 12:08:25 AM
digital performer kicked the shit out of pro tools when i used to use it
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: mfisch on May 21, 2005, 12:50:25 AM
pro tools? =)
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: heath on May 22, 2005, 09:36:59 AM
i'm a protools/nuendo guy.  while nuendo sounds a touch better (IMO), ProTools is so much easier and intuitive to use.
Title: Re: Mac Taping Software (Poll)
Post by: wbrisette on May 23, 2005, 05:53:22 AM
DP4 has a 2 GB limit last I checked, but I never made it to 4.5. I think I was at 4.01 or something when I used it.

while it does have the 2gb limit, each channel is its own seperate file, so you can run twice as long as compared to a recording program that only records "stereo" files

Even more to this however. Let's say you have a hard disk recorder that auto splits (or you manually split) files at around 2 GB. Each segment can be placed into DP on the same channel. What you have to be careful of is when you bounce the audio. If you bounce a 4 GB wave or SD file, DP will write it out that way, but you'll end up with a file that you can't use.

Typically what I do is put everything together in DP. Get my mix set correctly for the channels. Then save two copies of the project. Part 1 and Part 2. I delete the audio from part 1 that belongs in part 2 and then do the same in the part 2 project. This way I never have to worry about bouncing more than 2 GB worth of data.

Wayne