Taperssection.com
Gear / Technical Help => Recording Gear => Topic started by: Doin on December 29, 2005, 04:55:23 AM
-
I have heard of a method of recording concerts that utilizes a receiver that taps into the singer's earpiece.
Apparently it records at FM quality.
Does anyone know anything about this?
It sounds quite interesting. I am wondering how it would actually know which frequency the singer's earpiece is using.
-
Plus one would require time to scan for the channel that the singer uses, maybe also the need to get close enough?
Also: is the mix that the singer gets usable/enjoyable?
It is similar to using ALD or whatever the name is for the hearing impaired?
-
If you are trying to capture the transmission from a singer's wireless microphone- you would only capture the voice and whatever bleedthrough was captured by the microphone. It wouldn't be a good tape.
-Noah
-
I believe he is talking about tapping into the transmission to the singer's monitor, not the singer's mic output. Sounds like it has mediocre possibilities.
-
IEM recordings are usually flat, dull mixes. Usually they are also oddly mixed, as the user will want more of certain instruments, less of others.
You'll get a much better recording with mics.
-
rspencer, that is one entertaining avatar you've got!
Steve
-
Here's the latest thread regarding IEMs. Search the ts.com archive and you'll see why you shouldn't do it.
http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=55781.msg736250#msg736250
-
In ear monitors are the devil when it come to onstage recording..... They should be banned >:D
-
rspencer, that is one entertaining avatar you've got!
Steve
That Spiderman's a dancing machine ;)
-
Inner-ear monitors sound painful. You should probably look at in-ear monitors instead.
-
I once recorded a U2 show that way. The signal I got was extremely hissy and sounded like shit. Also, they seem to have stopped transmission during the last song...
-
Inner-ear monitors sound painful. You should probably look at in-ear monitors instead.
8)