Taperssection.com

Gear / Technical Help => Ask The Tapers => Topic started by: BWolf on June 20, 2006, 07:00:01 PM

Title: Patch question
Post by: BWolf on June 20, 2006, 07:00:01 PM
so I just started listening to the oysterhead split onmi tape that I made.  i think it sounds great.  only problem, apparently i pressed record on the 722 just a bit late and missed the first 30-60 seconds.  i running two rigs and obvisouly was paying too much attention to the other rig.

now heres my question.  i have the section i missed on my other recording (140s>v3>mt), but its only 24/48.  my split omni (51 TLs>v2>722) is recorded at 24/96.  how should i go about patching it.  should i upsample the MT source to be 24/96 and then patch, or should I patch after i dither/resample to 16/44?

thanks for the help.  i'll get the show upped as soon as i get it patched and tracked.

brad
Title: Re: Patch question
Post by: F.O.Bean on June 20, 2006, 07:52:31 PM
upsample to the highest sample/bit rate and go from there
Title: Re: Patch question
Post by: JasonSobel on June 20, 2006, 08:21:09 PM
yeah, upsample the 24/48 to 24/96 and use it to patch your split omni source.  no one is going to care that the first minute or whatever was actually only at 24/48 and upsampled for the patch, because the vast majority of the show really is at 24/96...
Title: Re: Patch question
Post by: Joe w. on June 20, 2006, 08:35:24 PM
Quote from: BWolf on June 20, 2006, 07:00:01 PM
only problem, apparently i pressed record on the 722 just a bit late and missed the first 30-60 seconds.

you've been hanging w/ nate too much :P
Title: Re: Patch question
Post by: mmedley. on June 20, 2006, 08:38:30 PM
Quote from: Joe w. on June 20, 2006, 08:35:24 PM
Quote from: BWolf on June 20, 2006, 07:00:01 PM
only problem, apparently i pressed record on the 722 just a bit late and missed the first 30-60 seconds.

you've been hanging w/ nate too much :P

Get off the internet and get crackin on that Roo 24/96 MMJ. Don't make me bust out the belt/switch.  ;D
Title: Re: Patch question
Post by: terrapinj on June 20, 2006, 08:41:10 PM
too bad the pre-roll is only 10 sec max (still saved my ass a couple times for opening notes)
Title: Re: Patch question
Post by: BWolf on June 20, 2006, 08:56:43 PM
Quote from: Joe w. on June 20, 2006, 08:35:24 PM
Quote from: BWolf on June 20, 2006, 07:00:01 PM
only problem, apparently i pressed record on the 722 just a bit late and missed the first 30-60 seconds.

you've been hanging w/ nate too much :P

QFT.  Its quite scary actually    :o

Tracking moe. from sunday afternoon and then going to do the oysterhead split omnis ;D

Thanks all.  +t
Title: Re: Patch question
Post by: F.O.Bean on June 20, 2006, 09:41:25 PM
Quote from: terrapinj on June 20, 2006, 08:41:10 PM
too bad the pre-roll is only 10 sec max (still saved my ass a couple times for opening notes)

really? even at 24/96(what ive been running) its a 5-sec pre-roll buffer ;D quite sweet actually ;)
Title: Re: Patch question
Post by: mmedley. on June 20, 2006, 10:05:25 PM
Quote from: Bean on June 20, 2006, 09:41:25 PM
Quote from: terrapinj on June 20, 2006, 08:41:10 PM
too bad the pre-roll is only 10 sec max (still saved my ass a couple times for opening notes)

really? even at 24/96(what ive been running) its a 5-sec pre-roll buffer ;D quite sweet actually ;)

Yeah, sample rate and bit depth determines your pre-roll time. Only get 5 at 24/96 as Bean mentioned. 10 seconds at 24/48...I just learned this myself about a month ago. Any lower bitdepths/samplerates I haven't even bothered with testing. ;D