Taperssection.com
Gear / Technical Help => Recording Gear => Topic started by: spreadheadtom on October 30, 2006, 11:43:20 PM
-
Widespread Panic
Municipal Auditorium
Nashville, TN
10-06-2006
song: Pilgrims (cut short for comp)
This is a comparison of the Marantz Oade ACM-671 and the Tascam Oade ACM HD-P2.
Both files were recorded in 24/48 using AKG c414b xls/ST (cards) on the same 8' stand ~20' ROC.
Can you tell which is which?
671-P2_comp_track01.flac:a72ff6e470aa223fb15dd9ee8d830a58
671-P2_comp_track02.flac:59e9651c3f6830018dae52f728ce7d08
http://digitalpanic.org/bittorrent/showthread.php?p=109091#post109091
-
cool.
were you using splitter cables and/or a converter box..?
-
cool.
were you using splitter cables and/or a converter box..?
2 different sets of mics, each set run into it's own recording device
-
Ok...the first is the HD-P2 and the second is the 671. Got a 50/50 shot. 8)
Both sound good.
-
To my ears track 2 seems to have just a little more detail than track 1 on the other hand track 1 seems to have a little fuller of a bottom end.
EDIT:...to echo that both do sound good.
-
To my ears track 2 seems to have just a little more detail than track 1 on the other hand track 1 seems to have a little fuller of a bottom end.
Ok I switch my answer then. :P
-
this should be interesting to see what everyone thinks
-
1. Tascam
2. Marantz
I own a P2 and had owned a 660. The 660 had a big-ass, so I bet big brother 671 has one too.
-
1. Tascam
2. Marantz
I own a P2 and had owned a 660. The 660 had a big-ass, so I bet big brother 671 has one too.
i haven't ever heard the ACM hd-p2, or the ACM 671.
but after listening to both, i'm going to guess that the first is the P2 and the 2nd if the 671.
-
To my ears track 2 seems to have just a little more detail than track 1 on the other hand track 1 seems to have a little fuller of a bottom end.
EDIT:...to echo that both do sound good.
i agree w/ this assessment. also, to be fair, i resampled/dithered track 1, since t1 was 24/48 and t2 was 16.44.1
1. hp2
2. 671
-
been several downloads and only a few guesses.
PM me if you want the answer.
-
full version
http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=74604.0
-
1. p2
2. 671
-
answer ?
-
answer ?
1. p2
2. 671
-
pm spreadheadtom. he may still have it. i deleted mine light years ago. btw, the 671 smoked it.
-
answer ?
1. p2
2. 671
official answer from spreadheadtom ?
8)
-
Mark, I just checked my PM's and spreadheadtom did tell me source 1 was in fact the HD-P2.
IMO this comp was incredibly close and it was hard to tell the difference (again, my opinion!)
-
sorry guys...just saw this. I do not have a copy of the comp anymore.
-
thanks keith !
-
sorry guys...just saw this. I do not have a copy of the comp anymore.
damn. i may have it on disc somewhere at home. i will look around.
-
sorry guys...just saw this. I do not have a copy of the comp anymore.
damn. i may have it on disc somewhere at home. i will look around.
shouldn't be hard to do again....It was mine and Chris' (orechall) sources
-
sorry guys...just saw this. I do not have a copy of the comp anymore.
damn. i may have it on disc somewhere at home. i will look around.
shouldn't be hard to do again....It was mine and Chris' (orechall) sources
you guys dont have identical rigs now though. i can, however, come up w/ 2 sets of 463's. OB?
-
you guys dont have identical rigs now though.
no....but we do still have the same recordings ::)
(stay away from Michael....he's starting to rub off on you.)
-
guys, i just upgraded my box.net account and uploaded these files...have at 'em:
http://www.box.net/shared/2pfnv25b8j
let me know if you have any problems
Keith
-
guys, i just upgraded my box.net account and uploaded these files...have at 'em:
http://www.box.net/shared/2pfnv25b8j
let me know if you have any problems
Keith
thanks!!! +T
Tommy
-
guys, i just upgraded my box.net account and uploaded these files...have at 'em:
http://www.box.net/shared/2pfnv25b8j
let me know if you have any problems
Keith
thanks!!! +T
Tommy
No problem...back atcha!