i record to a roland vs1880. are the converters in the edirol ua-5 better than the converters in the roland? thanks.
The UA-5 isn't bit perfect. Is the Roland?
I thought I heard somewhere that the A/D in the UA-5 is the same chip as the one in the Mini-Me.
As far as it not being bit-perfect, that's only true when you're giving it a digital signal (like from a D8 or the like). The reason it isn't bit-perfect is because it resamples digital sources. If you're giving the UA-5 an analog signal then it's not an issue because there's nothing to resample.
hope this helps,
Drew
Quote from: drewloo on November 06, 2003, 05:48:24 AM
I thought I heard somewhere that the A/D in the UA-5 is the same chip as the one in the Mini-Me.
As far as it not being bit-perfect, that's only true when you're giving it a digital signal (like from a D8 or the like). The reason it isn't bit-perfect is because it resamples digital sources. If you're giving the UA-5 an analog signal then it's not an issue because there's nothing to resample.
hope this helps,
Drew
The UA-5 does a very good job with A/D. The chip used is the same as the one in the Mini-Me according to Doug Oade.