Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: iRiver sound quality question  (Read 1794 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline madman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 158
iRiver sound quality question
« on: May 14, 2008, 12:23:19 AM »
I still haven't replaced my minidisc setup since it died a few months ago.  I've been looking at the PMD-620, but I've been thinking about picking up one of the iRiver H120s and using that for awhile (and likely doing a CF mod).  I read the FAQ and it says the sound quality is comparable to DAT recorders, but I wanted to know what people here think.  Any input is appreciated, thanks.

Offline blastroknow

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 362
  • you can fight about love all you want
Re: iRiver sound quality question
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2008, 01:58:11 AM »
Sound quality is fine and I would say it sounds similar to my old D8 input.  My SBM-1 input and A>D sounds tighter than the iRiver but not enough to outweigh the advantages of the safety clip feature in Rockbox and the ultra easy process of recording with a Rockboxed iRiver.  IMO the iRiver h120 is just a kick ass little gadget and you have the chance to buy one of those new old stock iHP120s right now.  The Marantz will only be cheaper later on but it sure looks cool and I think I will hunt down some recordings using it.
Core-sound HEB 4060s > iRiver h120
or
AT853 > AT8531 > ToddR mod SBM-1 > iRiver h120

Offline rastasean

  • in paradise
  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3699
  • Gender: Male
Re: iRiver sound quality question
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2008, 04:46:53 PM »
I just became the proud owner of a iriver h120 rockboxed unit myself.  ;D 8)
Thank you very much, thank you.  8) and thank you Flintstone. :)

If you're going to get an h120, do yourself a favor and pickup a pre amp/battery box as well since the preamps in the unit aren't that great (such as many recorders) and most mics used with it probably can't power it well enough. I must say that the rockbox community is wonderful and if you ever have questions about any features of the RockBox, you can hop on the IRC and they will help you out. I originally started "taping" (not music by any means) on a minidisc recorder so coming from that to this is highly customizable, like the fonts, how long the blacklight stays on, how long of a pre-record buffer to have, etc.
Pick one up, you won't be let down.
Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it’s worth.

Offline madman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 158
Re: iRiver sound quality question
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2008, 05:24:33 PM »
I use DPA4061s w/batt box which were enough to drive both of my MD units via line-in (I tape very loud shows in very small venues), but I also have a DPA pre.  I'll probably pick one of the iRivers up on EBay and use that until I decide if I need a PMD620 or not.  I appreciate the input.

Offline dano420

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 104
  • llama I am...
Re: iRiver sound quality question
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2008, 06:16:05 PM »
I love the rockboxed irivers so much that I bought two, one for mic'ing and one for soundboard input. I can then mix down the two recordings into one very nice recording at a cheap price! And the footprint is small! Not to mention that they will also play back flac and shn files. You can't go wrong!

Offline Will_S

  • Trade Count: (15)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2217
Re: iRiver sound quality question
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2008, 08:14:03 PM »
In a pinch I find that the iRiver can power a pair of 4.7k modded AT853 mics just fine (no battery box), and the built-in premp is decent enough for moderately loud rock shows.  I dunno, heavy metal might lead to overload distortion and it's too noisy for acoustic performances, but for a lot of music it seems to perform pretty comparably to an R09.  Compare the first and second sets of this show, all that was changed was the recorder:

http://www.archive.org/details/gat2007-12-05.at853uec.flac16f
« Last Edit: May 14, 2008, 08:16:08 PM by Will_S »

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.056 seconds with 30 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF