Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: does recording at 24 bit draw more power than 16?  (Read 3907 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline leehookem

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4439
  • Gender: Male
    • Texas Tapers
does recording at 24 bit draw more power than 16?
« on: April 24, 2009, 06:28:35 PM »
I'm sure that this has been discussed before, but I can't figure out any search parameters to look.

the reason for the question is I am running tests with a DVD battery with the R44.  I thought I was recording at 24/48, but just realized i'm at 16/48.

Running AKG 481 > R44 and Mytek Stereo96 (XLR out) > R44.
www.texastapers.org


AKG c480b ck61/ck63 > Tascam DR-70D
Oade ACM Marantz PMD-671
AKG ck61/63 > NBob Actives > Naiant PFA > Tascam DR-70D
Oade ACM Marantz PMD-671
Audiophile 2496 > Mytek Stereo96 DAC > Sony MDR-7506
Dual 1229 > Marantz 2270 > Kimber Kables > Cerwin Vega VS120

Canon Rebel XSi, EF 50 mm f/1.8, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Offline coloartist

  • Trade Count: (13)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2067
  • MGoldey -"you can shove those mics up your ass
Re: does recording at 24 bit draw more power than 16?
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2009, 06:52:41 PM »
I have no facts, but I would think twice as much data is being written, so it should use more power.
mk4>Kwon/din a/din>kc5>cmc6>kindkables XLR>788T
mk22>Kwon/NOS>kc5>cmc6>kindkablesXLR>788t                                                     
Canon XH-A1 Sony AX100                       
Samsung Backlit LED 55">Pioneer Elite SC-27>Snell Acoustics E.5  Series

Offline leehookem

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4439
  • Gender: Male
    • Texas Tapers
Re: does recording at 24 bit draw more power than 16?
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2009, 07:18:47 PM »
I would think so as well, just looking for some evidence.
www.texastapers.org


AKG c480b ck61/ck63 > Tascam DR-70D
Oade ACM Marantz PMD-671
AKG ck61/63 > NBob Actives > Naiant PFA > Tascam DR-70D
Oade ACM Marantz PMD-671
Audiophile 2496 > Mytek Stereo96 DAC > Sony MDR-7506
Dual 1229 > Marantz 2270 > Kimber Kables > Cerwin Vega VS120

Canon Rebel XSi, EF 50 mm f/1.8, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Offline gmm6797

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3598
  • Gender: Male
  • Schoeps MK4 > nBox Plat/Baby > FR-AV2/SDMixPre6ii
    • Homepage
Re: does recording at 24 bit draw more power than 16?
« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2009, 10:09:31 PM »
in my Edirol R09hr, no difference... I got into a show to realize my batteries didnt charge well the night before... opener, got 54 min at 24 bit before they died, for the headliner, 55 min ay 16 bit before the batteries died

Offline wbrisette

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2855
  • Gender: Male
    • Homepage
Re: does recording at 24 bit draw more power than 16?
« Reply #4 on: April 25, 2009, 07:53:52 AM »
I don't think recording at 24-bits would draw any additional power, but a lot would depend on the chipset being used and how they record 16-bit vs. 24-bit. For example, on the Zaxcom Deva, the native format is always 24-bits, to record 16-bits, the DSP has to do more work, but because of how the DSP is designed the amount of power required to convert to 16-bits, doesn't change. However, if a company is using a separate chip, or has to enable some part of a chip that normally doesn't get used, it's possible to draw more power. I think it's all device dependent depending on how they are doing things. But in general I would be surprised if any mode required any more or less power than another.

Wayne
Mics: Earthworks SR-77 (MP), QTC-1 (MP)

Editing: QSC RMX2450, MOTU 2408 MK3, Earthworks Sigma 6.2

Offline taperwheeler

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 496
  • Gender: Male
Re: does recording at 24 bit draw more power than 16?
« Reply #5 on: April 25, 2009, 09:36:09 AM »
I don't think recording at 24-bits would draw any additional power, but a lot would depend on the chipset being used and how they record 16-bit vs. 24-bit. For example, on the Zaxcom Deva, the native format is always 24-bits, to record 16-bits, the DSP has to do more work, but because of how the DSP is designed the amount of power required to convert to 16-bits, doesn't change. However, if a company is using a separate chip, or has to enable some part of a chip that normally doesn't get used, it's possible to draw more power. I think it's all device dependent depending on how they are doing things. But in general I would be surprised if any mode required any more or less power than another.

Wayne

And with that said, I imagine any consumption differences would be minimal.
Mics: SP-CMC-8 AT933 Body 4.7K mod AT853 (c, sc) U853 (h) Microline Shotguns
Pres: CA 9100, SP-Preamp
Recorders: MT2 , Tascam DR-07, PCM-M10, PCM A10

Offline DSatz

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (35)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3412
  • Gender: Male
Re: does recording at 24 bit draw more power than 16?
« Reply #6 on: June 20, 2009, 06:01:04 PM »
With the R-44 you set a certain buffer size, and as you record, whenever that much sample data is ready to be written to the memory card, it gets written--drawing some extra current for a moment each time it occurs. You can see this if you're running on internal batteries, because there comes a point at which each write to the memory card causes the battery level indicator to dip momentarily.

If you record 16-bit, the buffer fills less rapidly than if you record 24-bit, so there are correspondingly fewer writes to the card per minute or per hour. As a result, somewhat less power will be consumed over, say, an hour's time at 16 bits rather than 24, and at lower sampling rates as compared with higher ones.

But whether that translates into consistently or significantly longer battery life, I truly don't know. I'm willing to change batteries more often than might be strictly necessary, just so that I don't have to worry about their running out during any part of a recording. As a result I couldn't even tell you approximately how long the unit will run on a set of batteries in any particular setting--long enough for either half of any classical concert I've ever recorded with it, is all I know for sure.

--best regards
« Last Edit: June 21, 2009, 12:43:16 PM by DSatz »
music > microphones > a recorder of some sort

Offline bhtoque

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
  • Gender: Male
  • So much music, so little time.
Re: does recording at 24 bit draw more power than 16?
« Reply #7 on: June 21, 2009, 01:04:29 AM »
I'm sure that this has been discussed before, but I can't figure out any search parameters to look.

the reason for the question is I am running tests with a DVD battery with the R44.  I thought I was recording at 24/48, but just realized i'm at 16/48.

Running AKG 481 > R44 and Mytek Stereo96 (XLR out) > R44.

It does on the R-4 because the drive has to do more spinning to write the extra data. With an R-44 using flash memory I doubt the draw would be significant, but there probably is some extra power drawn by the extra data.

JAson
MG 200/210/270
AKG c422>s42>Hydra silver interconnects
AKG 391/92/93>MK 90/3 actives
>AM Hyper-Conductors
Studio Projects LSD2>MiAGi II
>Edirol R-4 (Oade T Mod)

db.etree.org/bhtoque

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.036 seconds with 32 queries.
© 2002-2025 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF