Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: protools level matching in post  (Read 1760 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spcyrfc

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 941
  • Gender: Male
  • Live from River City
    • BordersCrossing.net
protools level matching in post
« on: March 02, 2010, 06:14:57 PM »
i have recently returned to protools and well, i thought it was gonna be like riding a bike, but it has yet to feel that way... this bike changes.

i have a simple question i should be able to answer myself, but after searching pt forums and screwing off in pt for awhile, i have no avail.

i imported a stereo track into PT, separated the stereo track into two mono tracks and cannot get the levels to match on the on screen meter.  i tried compressing one channel more than the other, but that doesn't make any sense to me.  tried boosting the volume of the lower track, and percieved an audible difference in my cans, but on the screen, the meters still didn't match.

is there a simple way to match meters exactly in post?

thnaks,

luke.
mkh8040>aerco mp-2>pcmd-50
PFS: AKG 414xls

Record Local

www.borderscrossing.net

Offline Əkoostikal

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 680
  • Gender: Male
  • One of these days....
Re: protools level matching in post
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2010, 07:55:04 PM »
i have recently returned to protools and well, i thought it was gonna be like riding a bike, but it has yet to feel that way... this bike changes.

i have a simple question i should be able to answer myself, but after searching pt forums and screwing off in pt for awhile, i have no avail.

i imported a stereo track into PT, separated the stereo track into two mono tracks and cannot get the levels to match on the on screen meter.  i tried compressing one channel more than the other, but that doesn't make any sense to me.  tried boosting the volume of the lower track, and percieved an audible difference in my cans, but on the screen, the meters still didn't match.

is there a simple way to match meters exactly in post?

thnaks,

luke.


I am still learning a lot in PT and cannot answer you specifically, but you need to make sure that the "pre-fader monitoring" is not enabled to the meters.... That way you can see changes made to the mix in real time, which it sounds to me like that you are describing.
BONGWATER via Etree:

"Phil Keeps on growing, never even slowing, never really knowing all of the minds he's really blowing!!!!!"

Offline spcyrfc

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 941
  • Gender: Male
  • Live from River City
    • BordersCrossing.net
Re: protools level matching in post
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2010, 09:39:59 AM »
thank you, also added gain to the individual tracks and processed.  got close.  i'll still look for a way to match tracks to eachother. 

suppose i have one more, more general question

what order do you work in?
compression > eq > ? 
or
eq > compression >
mkh8040>aerco mp-2>pcmd-50
PFS: AKG 414xls

Record Local

www.borderscrossing.net

Offline unclelouie

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 180
  • Gender: Male
Re: protools level matching in post
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2010, 07:24:53 PM »
Since EQ'ing can have a big impact on dynamics (particularly in the low frequencies), you should EQ first, and then compress if necessary.

unclelouie.tapes_at_gmail.com

Offline spcyrfc

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 941
  • Gender: Male
  • Live from River City
    • BordersCrossing.net
Re: protools level matching in post
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2010, 07:32:57 PM »
and save! i just discovered... oh well. nothing much lost.
mkh8040>aerco mp-2>pcmd-50
PFS: AKG 414xls

Record Local

www.borderscrossing.net

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.04 seconds with 29 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF