Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass  (Read 7498 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline yousef

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1451
  • Gender: Male
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #15 on: April 05, 2011, 01:53:49 PM »
I think you make a good point but in terms of what we do I think bass roll-off at the mic is too much of a gamble: we all know how much the sound can differ from night to night -  for the same band in different rooms, different bands in the same venue and even the same band in the same venue...

If you can do a proper test recording (ie of that particular band in that particular room on that particular night) and decide that there really is too much bass then fair enough but I would rather take the risk of recording too much bass and have to tweak it in post than run the risk of coming home with an unacceptably thin recording that no amount of post-processing can properly rectify.

I understand the benefits that you are describing but I think that they are probably of less import than the potential drawbacks. Plus you have greater flexibility when applying EQ in post, both in terms of amount of cut and the frequencies affected.
music>other stuff>ears
my recordings: http://db.etree.org/yousef
http://www.manchestertaper.co.uk
twitter: @manchestertaper

Offline hi and lo

  • Trade Count: (38)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2294
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #16 on: April 05, 2011, 04:20:02 PM »
I think you make a good point but in terms of what we do I think bass roll-off at the mic is too much of a gamble: we all know how much the sound can differ from night to night -  for the same band in different rooms, different bands in the same venue and even the same band in the same venue...

If you can do a proper test recording (ie of that particular band in that particular room on that particular night) and decide that there really is too much bass then fair enough but I would rather take the risk of recording too much bass and have to tweak it in post than run the risk of coming home with an unacceptably thin recording that no amount of post-processing can properly rectify.

I understand the benefits that you are describing but I think that they are probably of less import than the potential drawbacks. Plus you have greater flexibility when applying EQ in post, both in terms of amount of cut and the frequencies affected.

Totally agree that it's too often a gamble, but only because the science of how it works with particular recorders has been completely obscured.

Roll-off is not meant to be tweaked in such a finite fashion as 'venue to venue.' Certain microphones will benefit from a threshold amount of roll-off 99.9% of the time, but you have to carefully evaluate what that threshold is. Once you know, you will never come home with an 'unacceptably thin recording.' In fact, you might still wish to remove a tad more bass as your ears and playback system dictate, but you're certainly better off than had no roll-off been used at all.

The goal is not to get bass response perfect before it hits the recorder, but rather to reduce a portion of the low frequency spectrum that is rarely useful or contains unwanted artifacts (hum, vibrations, etc.). For some microphones, a small amount of roll-off is beneficial regardless of the source music or environment.

Offline Shaun

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #17 on: April 06, 2011, 03:17:42 AM »
Just checked my Sounds Pro battery box and I think it's actually set up for 'no bass roll-off' already. It's one of the ones where you have to unscrew the top to get at the switches. I've never changed the setting since I bought it, and looking at the info on the sounds pro website it looks like it's set to 'no bass roll-off'. So it seems it's all due to the low cut filter on the M10.

Offline Shaun

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #18 on: May 19, 2011, 03:30:45 AM »
I've just made my second recording with the pcm-m10 and I have to say again it's disappointing. This time it was at a venue I've recorded at before (using the same mic set up but with my old sharp minidisc recorder) with excellent results. I definitely had the low cut filter off, no bass roll off on the battery box, going to line in, and recording in 48/96 mode and the recording lacks any real definition or any discerable low or high frequencies. Could I have a device with a defective line in?

Offline TimeBandit

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 237
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #19 on: May 19, 2011, 04:36:26 AM »
Could I have a device with a defective line in?

check out at home. record from a CD deck or similar into line-in. if there is a lack of sound maybe it´s defective.

Other to do´s: some recorders you can set EQ for recording, maybe yours is set with an EQ setting for "No Bass".

other points:

Battery box battery is bad

you recorded in a spot at the venue were phase deletion occured with your mic config. (maybe invert phase on one channel of the recording)


2015 rig: CA-11 -> CA-9100 -> PCM-M10
2016 rig: Sony PCM-M10 + SP-SPSB-4 microphone plug-in power supply +  SP-CMC8 with Low Sens mod
[backup: CA-9100 - Tascam DR-05 Firmware 2.0 + Yamaha Pocketrak W24]
video 2016: Casio EX-100 HS (same as Olympus Stylus1 - but much smaller - japan import not availiable in EU)

Offline morst

  • I think I found an error on the internet; #UnionStrong
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5988
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #20 on: June 19, 2011, 02:18:17 AM »
Cardioid mics do have "less bass pickup" so I would suggest you leave your roll-off/filter to OFF.  If your recording has "too much" bass, you can always EQ it out, however, you can't add what's missing.
Cardioid mics are, however, subject to the Proximity Effect which is a boosting of bass at close distances. But that's WAY more dramatic the last inch or two to the mic, versus the difference between 20 & 40 feet away. But compare that to Omni mics which don't have proximity effect at all. Different animals.

Experiment!!  8)
https://toad.social/@morst spoutible.com/morst post.news/@acffhmorst

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.04 seconds with 30 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF