Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Lowest noise figure eight?  (Read 10461 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline myke2241

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 237
  • Gender: Male
    • Herron Sound
Lowest noise figure eight?
« on: August 24, 2012, 11:20:40 AM »
i wish my KM120 had less self noise! I the is Senn MKH30 still king? what other good small options are there out there?

Thanks!
Sound Devices 788, Sony PCM-M10
MKH 416, MKH 70, MKH 80, MKH 8040, MKH 8090, Schoeps CCM 41, CCM 8, Sonic Studios DSM-6SL, Fostex M22RP MS, Soundfield ST450

Offline John Willett

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
  • Gender: Male
  • Bio:
    • Sound-Link ProAudio
Re: Lowest noise figure eight?
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2012, 05:28:13 AM »
i wish my KM120 had less self noise! I the is Senn MKH30 still king? what other good small options are there out there?

Yes, I would say that the MKH 30 is still the king - until Sennheiser eventually come out with the MKH 8030.

The Neumann KK120 + KM-A would be better than the old KM120.  The capsule is basically the same, but the KM-A has the latest low-noise electronics.

There are only three other single diaphragm condenser fig-8s that I know of:- The Schoeps MK8, the MBHO and the Ambient EMESSER.

The EMESSER is pretty small and is made for Ambient by MBHO.

Offline myke2241

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 237
  • Gender: Male
    • Herron Sound
Re: Lowest noise figure eight?
« Reply #2 on: August 28, 2012, 01:50:52 PM »
Thanks John.
i just looked at the KK line. very interesting. Isnt the Emesser kind of noisy? Do you think a MKH 8030 will ever see the light of day?

Although AES 42 is coming (slowly like a turtle) i think good analogue mics will be here to stay for the next 30 - 40 years.



Sound Devices 788, Sony PCM-M10
MKH 416, MKH 70, MKH 80, MKH 8040, MKH 8090, Schoeps CCM 41, CCM 8, Sonic Studios DSM-6SL, Fostex M22RP MS, Soundfield ST450

Offline John Willett

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
  • Gender: Male
  • Bio:
    • Sound-Link ProAudio
Re: Lowest noise figure eight?
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2012, 06:12:23 AM »
Thanks John.
i just looked at the KK line. very interesting. Isnt the Emesser kind of noisy? Do you think a MKH 8030 will ever see the light of day?

Although AES 42 is coming (slowly like a turtle) i think good analogue mics will be here to stay for the next 30 - 40 years.

The KK line works with both the KM-A (analogue) and the KM-D (digital), so will do both.

The MKH 8030 is definitely still in the pipeline, though I think another pattern will come first.

The new EMESSER is much better than the first version - much quieter.  I was referring to the new ATE 208 EMESSER.

Offline dream

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: Lowest noise figure eight?
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2012, 02:04:08 PM »
I just want to add a comment about the kk120. I have one for my Solution-D KMD system and this is a very good sounding figure eight (on KMD body).
A clear recommendation from my side.

Offline John Willett

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
  • Gender: Male
  • Bio:
    • Sound-Link ProAudio
Re: Lowest noise figure eight?
« Reply #5 on: August 30, 2012, 07:07:41 AM »
I just want to add a comment about the kk120. I have one for my Solution-D KMD system and this is a very good sounding figure eight (on KMD body).
A clear recommendation from my side.

Yes, it *is* very nice.

The KK120 is actually a symmetrical capsule - not actively symmetrical like the MKH 30 - but it is acoustically symmetrical with a passive front plate identical to the back plate.  This keeps the polar-pattern identical front and rear.

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 16587
  • Gender: Male
  • We create auditory illusions, not reproductions
Re: Lowest noise figure eight?
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2012, 10:29:56 AM »
I've been curious about the Ambient Emesser for years.  I wonder where they source the capsule, MBHO?  Anyone ever hear one?
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline John Willett

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
  • Gender: Male
  • Bio:
    • Sound-Link ProAudio
Re: Lowest noise figure eight?
« Reply #7 on: August 30, 2012, 10:59:31 AM »
I've been curious about the Ambient Emesser for years.  I wonder where they source the capsule, MBHO?  Anyone ever hear one?

Yes, it's an MBHO - certainly the latest Mk.II is.

I have one to test, but have not had a chance to really use it in anger yet.

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 16587
  • Gender: Male
  • We create auditory illusions, not reproductions
Re: Lowest noise figure eight?
« Reply #8 on: August 30, 2012, 10:08:28 PM »
If you can remember to do so, please post your thoughts on it once you get a chance to use it, John.

Thanks.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline SmokinJoe

  • Trade Count: (63)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4212
  • Gender: Male
  • "75 and sunny"... life is so much simpler.
    • uploads to archive.org
Re: Lowest noise figure eight?
« Reply #9 on: September 04, 2012, 12:54:22 PM »
Aren't LD's like AKG414's inherently quieter that most SD's?  I realize you have to be careful with apples vs oranges on these noise figures, but a 414XLS shows 6db noise, compared to 15 for the Emesser.  While LD's will have polar charts that show significant differences at different frequencies for most of their patterns, generally they are consistent on the Figure 8 setting.

I know it seems bizarre to most people to use mismatch mics, but I have seen a guy use an AT40xx LD for figure 8 and an Octava 012 card for mid, and it sounded pretty damn good.
Mics: Schoeps MK4 & CMC5's / Gefell M200's & M210's / ADK-TL / DPA4061's
Pres: V3 / ST9100
Decks: Oade Concert Mod R4Pro / R09 / R05
Photo: Nikon D700's, 2.8 Zooms, and Zeiss primes
Playback: Raspberry Pi > Modi2 Uber > Magni2 > HD650

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 16587
  • Gender: Male
  • We create auditory illusions, not reproductions
Re: Lowest noise figure eight?
« Reply #10 on: September 04, 2012, 03:19:24 PM »
Yeah, in general LDs are often quieter, though I'd be quite satisfied with 15dB of self-noise.  Using mismatched mics from different manufacturers is less of a potential problem with M/S than is would be for L/R recording since any differences manifest symetrically across the playback image instead of making things lop-sided.  It's not unusual to see LD's used as a side mics since they are generally more common than SD 8's.

The Emesser is sold on the expectation of using it with some other manufacturer's mic as Mid.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline H₂O

  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5750
  • Gender: Male
Re: Lowest noise figure eight?
« Reply #11 on: September 05, 2012, 08:54:26 AM »
Please correct me if I am wrong but most if not all LD mics get a figure eight pattern by using a two diaphragms and not a single diaphragm like the mk8/mk6/ak20/kk20
Music can at the least least explain you and at the most expand you
LMA Recordings

List

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 16587
  • Gender: Male
  • We create auditory illusions, not reproductions
Re: Lowest noise figure eight?
« Reply #12 on: September 05, 2012, 09:32:12 AM »
Please correct me if I am wrong but most if not all LD mics get a figure eight pattern by using a two diaphragms and not a single diaphragm like the mk8/mk6/ak20/kk20/MKH30
^^
Don't forget the Senn too.  You are in no need of correction otherwise.  I've never heard of a LD single diaphram fig-8.

As for the original question, the lowest noise figure-8 has to be a ribbon microphone.  However, since they are not nearly as sensitive as condensor mics, one would needs lots of clean gain from a low noise preamp to take advantage of that inherent low self-noise.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline DSatz

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (35)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3412
  • Gender: Male
Re: Lowest noise figure eight?
« Reply #13 on: September 10, 2012, 12:37:34 AM »
Gutbucket, the only single-diaphragm, large-diaphragm figure-8 that I'm aware of is the original M 8 capsule head for the Neumann CMV 3 amplifier series in the late 1920s. Also known as the Telefunken ELA M 303/1, it had a frequency range up to nearly 10 kHz, which was excellent for its day.

--best regards

music > microphones > a recorder of some sort

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 16587
  • Gender: Male
  • We create auditory illusions, not reproductions
Re: Lowest noise figure eight?
« Reply #14 on: September 10, 2012, 06:43:33 PM »
I imagined if there was a LD 8 it would probably have been an early one.  Certainly doesn't get much earlier than that!

Thanks to you both.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.057 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2025 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF