Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: timecode question  (Read 221 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kingdong

  • Trade Count: (24)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 108
timecode question
« on: March 12, 2026, 10:02:45 PM »
I recently picked up a couple Instamic Pro C's.  They seem to present some interesting possibilities for very wide stereo or other non-standard placements.  Running the control app on a phone allows them to be timecode synced which is awfully convenient when bringing together the mono files in Audacity (my primary editing sw).  My recent recorder of choice has been the Zoom F3 (no timecode) and I was thinking about the possibilities presented by being able to combine the Zoom recording with Instamic recordings.  In a first go, I found that aligning the front end of both sources was easy but by the end of an hour recording there was about a 5 ms variation.  Not surprising really and having done it previously, I know I can use Audacity to stretch one of the recordings so that they line up better (but I remember it being a somewhat fiddly process).  What I am wondering is if I could use an Atomos Ultrasonic Blue to add timecode to the F3 (via bluetooth adapter) and also sync the Instamic timecode to the Blue at the same time (I am guessing this is possible)? 
I am using an older version of Audacity and am pretty sure it doesn't pull in/understand the timecode info imbedded in the .wav files but am suspecting that the fact that all recording devices are synced to the same timecode means that I will not see drift between them.  If that is true, then I would only need to align the beginning of the recordings and not have to deal with the stretching.  Does anyone know if this is a correct assumption?
Thanks in advance!

Offline goodcooker

  • Trade Count: (47)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5226
  • Gender: Male
Re: timecode question
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 10:32:23 AM »
Timecode is metadata (a stable running time reference) embedded in the file. It will not sync the clocks of the different devices. It only provides a reference to line the files up in post.

What you need to align the actual clocks in the devices is Wordclock Sync which is not available on your devices. Devices that are Wordclock Sync capable use one clock to be the Master and all others are set to follow it to the sample level.

Think of it this way

Timecode is a clock on the wall that both of your recorders can "see". The internal clocks operate independently but they both can see what time it is.

Wordclock Sync is an internal clock that is on one of your recorders that the other recorder can see (through a pulse code provided by a cable connecting them) and align it's own internal clock to it so that each recorder runs at exactly the same rate (for 48kHz each recorder puts 48,000 samples per second in the the exact same place)

Sharing a timecode source then shrinking/stretching to fit is the only option for using the devices you mentioned. There is a tutorial (created by morst IIRC) somewhere here on TS that provides a formula for stretching files in Audacity that are very close to sample accurate.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 10:56:00 AM by goodcooker »
Sennheiser e614 > Aerco MP2 > Tascam DR701d

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/goodcooker

"Are you the Zman?" - fan at Panic 10-08-10 Kansas City
"I don't know who left this perfectly good inflatable wook doll here, but if I'm blowing her up, I'm keeping her." -  hoppedup

Offline kingdong

  • Trade Count: (24)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 108
Re: timecode question
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 12:20:12 PM »
I appreciate the explanation.  I guess that is what I didn't really understand.  My hope was that maybe the device(s) would use the master clock (Atomos device in this case) the keep their internal clock/circuitry (the part that captures 48k samples per second) in sync with each other. 
I guess in my mind I was making it more sophisticated than it is. 

I guess to my current understanding, the timecode gives me no benefit.  Although I can use the app to start the insxtamics simultaneously, that won't be sample perfect to starting the Zoom F3 so I will still have to first line up the beginning of the recordings, then look at some waveform near the end and stretch whomever's sample clock is slower.  If I am missing some hidden benefit, I'd love to hear it...



Offline goodcooker

  • Trade Count: (47)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5226
  • Gender: Male
Re: timecode question
« Reply #3 on: Today at 11:33:33 AM »

With the growing market segment of consumer level devices being described as "pro" in the video/audio world some of the marketing speak can be misleading.

A device that has timecode is being marketed to users as "features rock solid wireless timecode to perfectly align your audio in post production". That works great for audio clips of a few minutes for video. Not so much for an hour long main stereo pair recording.

Some of this is over my head too. I bought a pair of Movo wireless mics when they hit the market a few years ago. Not sure how two separate mics make a stereo pair recording unless I'm just over thinking it and the clock sync is actually in the receiver not the mics.
Sennheiser e614 > Aerco MP2 > Tascam DR701d

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/goodcooker

"Are you the Zman?" - fan at Panic 10-08-10 Kansas City
"I don't know who left this perfectly good inflatable wook doll here, but if I'm blowing her up, I'm keeping her." -  hoppedup

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.064 seconds with 33 queries.
© 2002-2026 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF