Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Post-Production Matrix Percentages?  (Read 2934 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline grider

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4570
  • Gender: Male
  • always give more than you take
Post-Production Matrix Percentages?
« on: November 01, 2005, 12:34:50 PM »
so rdptha2d and I are considering creating matrix recordings by blending both my on stage AKG481 recordings, with my soundboard recordings of several recent Lotus shows; is there a conventional wisdom about the percentages of each source to be used, or is it more subjective than that and based upon what sounds good to the ears, this will be a first time project of this type for Ron and me, any input is appreciated

Offline mmmatt

  • taping > photography
  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4168
  • Gender: Male
  • ... A broken angel sings from a guitar
    • LightCraft Photography
Re: Post-Production Matrix Percentages?
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2005, 12:42:15 PM »
so rdptha2d and I are considering creating matrix recordings by blending both my on stage AKG481 recordings, with my soundboard recordings of several recent Lotus shows; is there a conventional wisdom about the percentages of each source to be used, or is it more subjective than that and based upon what sounds good to the ears, this will be a first time project of this type for Ron and me, any input is appreciated
what I typically do chris is to pick my favorite source and then bring the other up until I just notice it being there.  Truly it comes down to your ears though.

Matt
*edit*
don't be affraid to add effects to each source individually.  Remember the sum equals the whole so you don't need two perfect sources to make a great matrix.  For instance if the sbd is lacking bass and the mics are bass heavy, you may have a good ballance when you mix them together.

« Last Edit: November 01, 2005, 12:44:17 PM by mmmatt »
I do think taping is the reality of the business..it is also an impetus for artists to create studio CDs that are ART, not just another recording...    Fareed Haque  2-4-2005




Canon 24-70 f2.8L, Canon 135 f2L, Canon 70-200 f4L, Canon 50 f1.8, > Canon 5D or Canon xt (digi) and Canon 1N (film)

BobW

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Post-Production Matrix Percentages?
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2005, 08:57:11 PM »
I've heard it said the 70% SBD & 30% AUD can be a good launching point.

I guess that there are many variables.
A bad room and you may want to EQ the AUD just to get some applause and a little ambience.
Many variables.

Offline Gordon

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 11790
  • Gender: Male
    • my list
Re: Post-Production Matrix Percentages?
« Reply #3 on: November 21, 2005, 12:22:33 AM »
I've only done one but it was around 60% sbd 40% aud.
Microtech Gefell M20 or M21 > Nbob actives > Naiant PFA > Sound Devices MixPre-6 II @ 32/48

https://archive.org/details/fav-gordonlw

https://archive.org/details/teamdirtysouth

kskreider

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Post-Production Matrix Percentages?
« Reply #4 on: November 21, 2005, 12:37:50 AM »
I think that my last one was 80% SBD 20% AUD, but only because the AUD sounded like ass b/c of a BIG BRICK WALL behind the band.

It is going to vary wildly depending on your particulars.  Try a few and tweak as you go. 

Offline adubphoto

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 176
  • Gender: Male
  • What happened?!
    • www.boymangodshit.com
Re: Post-Production Matrix Percentages?
« Reply #5 on: November 21, 2005, 11:29:09 AM »
I almsost exclusively do matrix recordings. Almost every one is different and I just play it by ear.
Ret. Audio: Rode NT5's(rodents) > Omnistudio USB > Gateway5300> Cubase
Visual: Canon 30D // Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 // Canon 50mm f1.8 // Canon 70-200mm f2.8 // Canon 580EX

 
Aquarium Rescue Unit Flickr photo set | FLips Flickr photo set | GRAB Flickr photo set

Offline Nick Graham

  • Amorican
  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 4068
  • Gender: Male
Re: Post-Production Matrix Percentages?
« Reply #6 on: November 21, 2005, 12:45:03 PM »
Last time I did one I just kept playing around increasing/decreasing levels...ended up with 43% AUD/57% board.
Right now nothing...in the past: Schoeps CMC6, AKG 480, AKG 460, AKG 414, MBHO 603a, Neumann KM100, ADK TL>Schoeps MK4, Schoeps MK2, Schoeps MK41, AKG ck61, AKG ck62, AKG ck63, Neumann AK40, Neumann AK50, MBHO ka200>Lunatec V2, Lunatec V3, Apogee Mini-Me, Oade M148, Oade M248, Sound Devices MP2, Sonosax SXM2>Sony (mod)SBM1, Apogee AD500>D7, D8, D100, M1, R1, R4, R09, iRiver HP120, Microtrack

Offline fsulloway

  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1765
  • Gender: Male
Re: Post-Production Matrix Percentages?
« Reply #7 on: November 21, 2005, 04:07:42 PM »
Almost every one is different and I just play it by ear.

exactly.
schoeps ccm4's, mk4v, mk2h, mk41
AKG ck62, ck63, ck61
Nbob/pfa, Naiant/pfa
SD 10T

"Wilmington, North Carolina....Let us hear your motherf***in' pride!" Patterson Hood 12-09-04

"Just About Unwound From Chasing Down The Sound"

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: Post-Production Matrix Percentages?
« Reply #8 on: November 21, 2005, 09:19:53 PM »
chris, send me those and i'll do them bud

you should have just done that to begin w/, i was wondering if you had SBD's of all those as well
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: Post-Production Matrix Percentages?
« Reply #9 on: November 21, 2005, 09:20:42 PM »
oh and FWIW, i think the onstages are fine the way they are tho, bringing in ambience may throw off the balance a bit, i dunno tho, worth a shot
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline wbrisette

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2855
  • Gender: Male
    • Homepage
Re: Post-Production Matrix Percentages?
« Reply #10 on: November 22, 2005, 12:38:31 PM »
Like others have pointed out, it's all in your ears and really a percentage. What I tend to do with mine is first mute the board. I then mix the two mic sources until I have what I like. Then I bring in the board. I play around with the board and the mics (I usually put the mics onto another bus channel and then control the amount of the mic mix from that bus rather than mess with the levels of the individual mics or sets of mics). The only time my setup is similar is when I'm doing a festival or a show with multiple artists and I didn't have to adjust the settings on the Deva. Even then, I will tinker around with the mix until it sounds good to my ears. But each show is very different from each other as far as percentages go, I wouldn't want even think what it is I'm using. I am however very fond of audience mixes, so sometimes I have a tendency to make those higher than the board.

Wayne
Mics: Earthworks SR-77 (MP), QTC-1 (MP)

Editing: QSC RMX2450, MOTU 2408 MK3, Earthworks Sigma 6.2

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.055 seconds with 35 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF