Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Cool Edit Pro Question...reducing cymbals???  (Read 1634 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline KLowe

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3477
  • Gender: Male
  • CrossFit....check you ego at the door
Cool Edit Pro Question...reducing cymbals???
« on: December 26, 2005, 06:00:27 PM »
Hey Yall,
Quick question.  I'v made a post show matrix of mofro with CEP and am very pleased with how it sounds.  One thing that is driving me a little nuts is the cymbals sound to prominent in the mix.  Is there a way with CEP that I can reduce the cybal frequency and boost the mid-range stuff a little without making the recording sound weird?

Thanks for any help

KLowe
I actually work for a living with music, instead of you jerk offs who wish they did.

bwaaaahahahahahaha.... that is awesome!

Offline John Kelly

  • Been a while...
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9753
  • Gender: Male
    • The Jokell
Re: Cool Edit Pro Question...reducing cymbals???
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2005, 12:42:29 AM »
The easiest way to do that would be to load up a parametric EQ and do a little "seek and destroy" - i.e. decrease the bandwidth and boost the gain, find the frequency that sounds the worst, then adjust it lower. 

I'm not sure of the specifics in CEP, but my guess is that there is probably an included parametric EQ plugin that you could use.
Sennheiser MKH8040st > SD 702
XBL/PSN/Steam ID: thejokell

Offline stlram

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 125
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Cool Edit Pro Question...reducing cymbals???
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2005, 09:15:49 AM »
I've found that around 8,000 hrtz for the primary sound and 12,000 hrtz for the upper air to be about the right frequencies for cymbals. Try and octive and a half at around the 8,000 makrk and reduse slightly until it pleases you.

Offline bluegrass_brad

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3581
  • Gender: Male
  • Old and in the way.
Re: Cool Edit Pro Question...reducing cymbals???
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2005, 02:03:28 PM »
You also might try only EQ'ing the source (aud or sbd) that has the prominant cymbals before matrixing them together, I would assume its the board mix which has the cymbals prominant. This would retain the full range in the AUD source.
CK1x, CK2x, CK3x > Hub Industry Cables > Naiant PFA or MK46 > 460B
CK1, CK8, CK63 > 460b

"That was back in a time when society was not quite ready for this music. Anyone remember those days? That's when punk rock was dangerous, right?" - Mike Ness

Offline momule

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2178
  • Gender: Male
Re: Cool Edit Pro Question...reducing cymbals???
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2005, 10:42:33 AM »
Not sure where the freq your trying to cut falls into . But her is where you might find the frequencies that are buggin ya

Snare.   Fatness @ 120-240Hz;  Boing @ 900Hz;  Crispness @5kHz;  Snap @10kHz
Toms.   Fullness @ 240-500Hz;  Attack @ 5-7kHz
Floor tom. Fullness @ 80-120Hz; Attack @ 5kHz
Hi Hat And Cymbals.  Clang @ 200Hz;  Sparkle @ 8-10Khz

Hope to see ya again this year @ waka..
Nick
AKG 463's (uno ck62) > Mackie Onyx Satellite > Microtrack II

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.05 seconds with 29 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF