Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: MP3 vs WMA  (Read 2907 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ~sin213~

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 163
  • Kaizoku!
MP3 vs WMA
« on: January 02, 2008, 10:13:06 PM »
I just got a new MP3 player for Xmas and noticed that it will play both MP3 and WMA files.

Is one better than the other?  It's only 1gb, so size matters.  I'm thinking 128-160 kbps for MP3, WMA you don't get to select a bitrate.

Any thoughts?

Thanx in advance!
#1 - MM-HLSC-1 > MM-MBM > R09
#2 - AT853 > CA9100 3wire Preamp/BattBox > R09

Coachella 06, 07, 08
Lollapalooza 95, 96, 97, 03, 08

Upcoming Shows
9/3 - Ice Cube | 9/8 - The Toadies | 9/22 - Beck |9/23 - My Morning Jacket | 9/27 - Edgefest (Gogol!) | 10/11 - The Bakerton Group | 10/14 - The Roots | 11/28 - Dir en Grey | 11/29 - Soulfly & Cavelera Conspiracy | 12/13 - NIN (Vegas)

Drive Out The Bush Regime!
For more info on how you can get involved, plz visit:
http://www.worldcantwait.net

Offline run_run_run

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5253
  • Gender: Male
Re: MP3 vs WMA
« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2008, 06:02:58 PM »
My thoughts are mp3s are pretty much compatible with every software and hardware mp3 player, where WMA can be limited. If in a few years you move to something that does not like WMAs, you will not have to re rip with mp3.

Offline deadheadcorey

  • HOME TEAM Tapir
  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4223
  • Gender: Male
  • think for yourself, question authority
    • My Recordings on the LMA
Re: MP3 vs WMA
« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2008, 06:39:31 PM »
mp3 is way better then wma.
mics: Audix M1245a-HC; AKG SE300B/CK91; Naiant X-O (hanging in the sweet spot @ Quixote's True Blue)
pres: Oade T+ UA-5; digimod UA-5
recs: R-09x3

iso: 2 ck93 caps
iso: pair of AT4041 mics

Official Archivist for Grant Farm

http://www.facebook.com/kindrecordingscolorado

Jerry Joseph rap during 'Conscious Contact'
"Life's pretty good. life's pretty good. it isn't all good.
I hate it when people tell me its all good. it's not all good.
it's not suppose to be all good. it's suppose to be bad sometimes so you can enjoy the good parts."

Offline twatts (pants are so over-rated...)

  • <://PHiSH//><
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9941
  • Gender: Male
  • Lego made a Mini-Fig of me!
Re: MP3 vs WMA
« Reply #3 on: January 03, 2008, 06:44:20 PM »
Make and keep both.  My Verizon phone only uses WMA, but Heathers phone uses MP3.

I mean who cares about space or quality or any of that crap - you have the SHN/FLACs elsewhere, right???

Terry
***Do you have PHISH, VIDA BLUE, JAZZ MANDOLIN PROJECT or any other Phish related DATs/Tapes/MDs that need to be transferred???  I can do them for you!!!***

I will return your DATs/Tapes/MDs.  I'll also provide Master FLAC files via DropBox.  PM me for details.

Sony PCM R500 > SPDIF > Tascam HD-P2
Nakamichi DR-3 > (Oade Advanced Concert Mod) Tascam HD-P2
Sony MDS-JE510 > Hosa ODL-276 > Tascam HD-P2

******

Offline boojum

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3629
  • Gender: Male
Re: MP3 vs WMA
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2008, 08:50:35 PM »
MP3 is supported cross-platform and the most widely used.  It is the lossy standard.  Good MP3 files are virtually indistinguishable from WAV.  More than one "Golden Ears" has been fooled on this in a double blind test.  I have never bothered with WMA so I cannot comment on their quality of lack of.

Cheers
Nov schmoz kapop.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.049 seconds with 34 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF