Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Playback using FLAC  (Read 3213 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SonicSound

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1569
  • Gender: Male
Playback using FLAC
« on: June 07, 2008, 05:44:02 PM »
Has anyone experienced any audible degraded in sound quality when play files in FLAC vs. WAV?

Does the CPU create noise/strain when the conversion of the FLAC player is processing?

I plan to do some comps soon once I get my new DAC.
SD: Schoeps  M222/NT222's & CMC6's - MK 41V's, 21's, 5's, 8's
LD: Microtech Gefell UM900's, Shure KSM44's
V3, 744t

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18873
  • Gender: Male
Re: Playback using FLAC
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2008, 05:49:13 PM »
Has anyone experienced any audible degraded in sound quality when play files in FLAC vs. WAV?

Nope.

Does the CPU create noise/strain when the conversion of the FLAC player is processing?

Noise -- not in my experience.  Not sure how it would / could.  ??  Strain -- not sure what you mean.  Certainly uses some CPU cycles, but I've noticed no performance issues.

FWIW, my playback:

    PC / SqeezeCenter / FLAC > wi-fi > Sqeezebox > digital out > Sony STR-DA3000ES > Von Schweikert VR-2s
    PC / Foobar2000 > M-Audio Audiophile 2496 > digital out > Mytek Stereo96 DAC > AKG K501 headphones
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) > Roland R-05

Offline SonicSound

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1569
  • Gender: Male
Re: Playback using FLAC
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2008, 06:01:25 PM »
Brian thank's for your input+

Anyone else?
SD: Schoeps  M222/NT222's & CMC6's - MK 41V's, 21's, 5's, 8's
LD: Microtech Gefell UM900's, Shure KSM44's
V3, 744t

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: Playback using FLAC
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2008, 06:07:23 PM »
flawless. Ive been using FLAC on my pc for playback for YEARS, and havent had any problems, and im on an older pc
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline JasonSobel

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3327
  • Gender: Male
    • My show list
Re: Playback using FLAC
« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2008, 06:11:21 PM »
Certainly uses some CPU cycles, but I've noticed no performance issues.

exactly.  The amount of processing power required to decode the FLAC back to LPCM before outputing the signal is quite minimal.  With nothing else going, I'm sure even a real old P3 computer could handle it.  Which means that with modern processors, it's essentially not an issue at all.

Offline MattD

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4634
  • Gender: Male
Re: Playback using FLAC
« Reply #5 on: June 07, 2008, 08:03:43 PM »
exactly.  The amount of processing power required to decode the FLAC back to LPCM before outputing the signal is quite minimal.  With nothing else going, I'm sure even a real old P3 computer could handle it.  Which means that with modern processors, it's essentially not an issue at all.

I'm currently using a PIII 600 with 128MB RAM running Windows 2000 and foobar to play back my FLACs. I've never had a hiccup. Currently I'm using about 15-20% of my CPU to play back 16/44.1. 24/96 tops out at about 25-30%.
Out of the game … for now?

Offline SonicSound

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1569
  • Gender: Male
Re: Playback using FLAC
« Reply #6 on: June 07, 2008, 08:56:31 PM »
What about Media Monkey FLAC?

Any feed back especially at 24bit 96 --> 192
SD: Schoeps  M222/NT222's & CMC6's - MK 41V's, 21's, 5's, 8's
LD: Microtech Gefell UM900's, Shure KSM44's
V3, 744t

Offline boojum

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3629
  • Gender: Male
Re: Playback using FLAC
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2008, 04:17:44 AM »
I run foobar2000 > Extigy > hafler XL-280 > Paradigm MiniMonitor v.4.  No problems.

To step back and take a rational look at this, if there were playback problems with FLAC not many folks would be using it.   8)
Nov schmoz kapop.

Offline SonicSound

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1569
  • Gender: Male
Re: Playback using FLAC
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2008, 07:40:16 AM »
By the way my ears are not hearing the difference with my current playback source...

However please keep the options coming.

Identifying your playback sources is very helpful

+Thanks
SD: Schoeps  M222/NT222's & CMC6's - MK 41V's, 21's, 5's, 8's
LD: Microtech Gefell UM900's, Shure KSM44's
V3, 744t

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10262
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Playback using FLAC
« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2008, 10:38:18 AM »
same, no issues w/flac playback.
and I do A/B between wireless > sb3 (playing FLAC) >DAC straight up redbook trough my Oppo > DAC

Offline Javier Cinakowski

  • !! Downhill From Here !!
  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4325
  • Gender: Male
Re: Playback using FLAC
« Reply #10 on: June 14, 2008, 11:20:18 AM »
no playback problems here, but only use 16bit flac...
Neumann KM185mp OR DPA ST2015-> Grace Design Lunatec V2-> Tascam DR-100mkIII

Offline boojum

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3629
  • Gender: Male
Re: Playback using FLAC
« Reply #11 on: July 06, 2008, 11:52:56 AM »
FLAC is a lossless format.  If you compress with FLAC and then decompress the filer with FLAC it is bit for bit excatly the same as the original WAV it was made from.  So, what could be different??

When I play FLAC through foobar I get a 1% or 2% usage of total CPU power.  Check over at HydrogenAudio (http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php) for a lot of info in their FLAC forum.  The author, Josh Coalson, is active over there, too.

Cheers
Nov schmoz kapop.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.056 seconds with 36 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF