I feel you Dana. I still track according to disc for my 16-Bit flacs, but I also either:
1. Stream or listen w/ fb2k on my PC OR
2. Listen w/ my Zune in the car/at work
so I have been thinking of doing away w/ disc numbers as well, and doing it set+track like I do w/ my 24-Bit stuff. It really doesnt matter either way, since the stuff on my Zune is d/l'd from the LMA(99% of my recordings) and are already tagged, so my Zune doesnt show disc numbers anyway. And I include the track title at the end of every song/track like this anyway:
16-Bit FLACS
moe2008-06-06.ka500.603a.722.d1.t01_Set_Intro
moe2008-06-06.ka500.603a.722.d1.t02_The_Road
24-Bit FLACS
moe2008-06-06.ka500.603a.2448.set1.t01_Set_Intro
moe2008-06-06.ka500.603a.2448.set1.t02_The_Road
etc so I agree w/ what others have posted. BUT, I do like how easily I can identify my 16Bit vs. my 24Bit recordings thru fb2k w/ the disc number vs. the set number tho, so maybe I'll continue to label the way I have the last 5-6 years. I just think its getting pointl;ess to list disc number anymore, with IPods and Zunes and all of the mp3 players out there. As long as the tracks are tagged w/ eitehr LMA or manually by yourself, I think its a moot point anyway
+T, good thread, because this has been on my mind alot lately