Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: MM-HLSC-3or1 Battery Box necessary?  (Read 3811 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bipton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
MM-HLSC-3or1 Battery Box necessary?
« on: March 01, 2009, 11:24:09 PM »
I saw that theses sennheisers can handle 138db SPL without a battery box.....Is a battery box necessary since they can handle such high levels by themselves? Anyone have experience?

Offline darktrain

  • Trade Count: (715)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2875
  • Gender: Male
  • Whats next?
Re: MM-HLSC-3or1 Battery Box necessary?
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2009, 12:48:04 AM »
they can but only with the 4.7k mod

Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: MM-HLSC-3or1 Battery Box necessary?
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2009, 08:18:25 AM »
I saw that theses sennheisers can handle 138db SPL without a battery box.....Is a battery box necessary since they can handle such high levels by themselves? Anyone have experience?

Hello,

As far as I'm concerned they can handle really loud rock concerts, no mods, no issues. I've been taping loud to very loud concerts but always using a regular BB with my R-09HR Line In (MM sells a really small bb, same size as a Zippo lighter). No distortion at all. Great mics all around.
Take care  :coolguy:
Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline Liquid Drum

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 661
  • Gender: Male
Re: MM-HLSC-3or1 Battery Box necessary?
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2009, 08:32:58 AM »
I must have had a duff pair 'cos my HLSC's couldn't handle anything loud, even balcony taping. That was until Church modded them and then they worked well.

There's no way they can handle 138spl.
Mics:
AT933/C

Batt-Boxes, Pre-amps:
CA-9100

Recorders:
Edirol R-09
iRiver H120 (CF Modded)
Sony MZ-RH910 Hi-MD

Video: Canon HV20 E

Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: MM-HLSC-3or1 Battery Box necessary?
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2009, 11:46:12 AM »
I must have had a duff pair 'cos my HLSC's couldn't handle anything loud, even balcony taping. That was until Church modded them and then they worked well.

There's no way they can handle 138spl.

100% agreed on the 138spl. ;)
Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: MM-HLSC-3or1 Battery Box necessary?
« Reply #5 on: March 02, 2009, 12:01:06 PM »
I saw that theses sennheisers can handle 138db SPL without a battery box.....Is a battery box necessary since they can handle such high levels by themselves? Anyone have experience?

Hello,

As far as I'm concerned they can handle really loud rock concerts, no mods, no issues. I've been taping loud to very loud concerts but always using a regular BB with my R-09HR Line In (MM sells a really small bb, same size as a Zippo lighter). No distortion at all. Great mics all around.
Take care  :coolguy:

My measurements at 1k at 114 db unmodified indicate a distortion of almost 8% :) Now that's at 1k at lower frequencies I suspect that percentage would increase dramatically. They dont need a mod for some things.. But if you are in a loud concert they should be modified and never run with out a battery box. And besides that you will want to always use a foam in front of the capsule as there is no proper protection for fine Derbies from entering the front of the capsule and depositing them selves on the diaphragm or worse damaging the diaphragm part of my mod I put a fine brass mesh in front of the capsule so that the diaphragm is protected and RF shielded.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2009, 12:03:11 PM by Church-Audio »
for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: MM-HLSC-3or1 Battery Box necessary?
« Reply #6 on: March 02, 2009, 02:38:00 PM »
I saw that theses sennheisers can handle 138db SPL without a battery box.....Is a battery box necessary since they can handle such high levels by themselves? Anyone have experience?

Hello,

As far as I'm concerned they can handle really loud rock concerts, no mods, no issues. I've been taping loud to very loud concerts but always using a regular BB with my R-09HR Line In (MM sells a really small bb, same size as a Zippo lighter). No distortion at all. Great mics all around.
Take care  :coolguy:

My measurements at 1k at 114 db unmodified indicate a distortion of almost 8% :) Now that's at 1k at lower frequencies I suspect that percentage would increase dramatically. They dont need a mod for some things.. But if you are in a loud concert they should be modified and never run with out a battery box. And besides that you will want to always use a foam in front of the capsule as there is no proper protection for fine Derbies from entering the front of the capsule and depositing them selves on the diaphragm or worse damaging the diaphragm part of my mod I put a fine brass mesh in front of the capsule so that the diaphragm is protected and RF shielded.

I might be a very lucky guy. I've never had any problems with my pair. Even at very loud concerts. You're correct about the foam protection.  ;)
Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: MM-HLSC-3or1 Battery Box necessary?
« Reply #7 on: March 02, 2009, 09:30:02 PM »
I saw that theses sennheisers can handle 138db SPL without a battery box.....Is a battery box necessary since they can handle such high levels by themselves? Anyone have experience?

Hello,

As far as I'm concerned they can handle really loud rock concerts, no mods, no issues. I've been taping loud to very loud concerts but always using a regular BB with my R-09HR Line In (MM sells a really small bb, same size as a Zippo lighter). No distortion at all. Great mics all around.
Take care  :coolguy:

My measurements at 1k at 114 db unmodified indicate a distortion of almost 8% :) Now that's at 1k at lower frequencies I suspect that percentage would increase dramatically. They dont need a mod for some things.. But if you are in a loud concert they should be modified and never run with out a battery box. And besides that you will want to always use a foam in front of the capsule as there is no proper protection for fine Derbies from entering the front of the capsule and depositing them selves on the diaphragm or worse damaging the diaphragm part of my mod I put a fine brass mesh in front of the capsule so that the diaphragm is protected and RF shielded.

I might be a very lucky guy. I've never had any problems with my pair. Even at very loud concerts. You're correct about the foam protection.  ;)

Unless you measure db levels at the shows you go to with a calibrated db meter you might not be in as loud of a show as you think you are.

Chris

for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

Offline itook2much

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1526
  • Gender: Male
  • AKA rspencer
    • my masters
Re: MM-HLSC-3or1 Battery Box necessary?
« Reply #8 on: March 02, 2009, 10:53:01 PM »
And besides that you will want to always use a foam in front of the capsule as there is no proper protection for fine Derbies from entering the front of the capsule and depositing them selves on the diaphragm or worse damaging the diaphragm part of my mod I put a fine brass mesh in front of the capsule so that the diaphragm is protected and RF shielded.

 ??? Canadian slang for dust?  :)
DPA 4060 (CS HEB) > CS BB > Edirol R-09

Backups:  DPA 4060 (1/8"), SP-BMC-2, SP-SPSB-6, Sony MZ-NH1

Quote from: tomluvsgiants
rule #1 - get the show taped
rule #2 - see rule #1    >:D

Quote from: Grace Hopper
“If it's a good idea, go ahead and do it. It's much easier to apologize than it is to get permission.”

Offline Sunday Driver

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Re: MM-HLSC-3or1 Battery Box necessary?
« Reply #9 on: March 02, 2009, 11:18:30 PM »
Didn't Sennheiser manufacture the mke 40 with a pop filter? Wouldn't that be sufficient to protect it from dust and debris?

As for the thread starter, do not believe for a second the 138 db rating quoted on MM's site.
You either record it or it's gone forever.
My Tapes

Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: MM-HLSC-3or1 Battery Box necessary?
« Reply #10 on: March 03, 2009, 08:34:29 AM »
I saw that theses sennheisers can handle 138db SPL without a battery box.....Is a battery box necessary since they can handle such high levels by themselves? Anyone have experience?

Hello,

As far as I'm concerned they can handle really loud rock concerts, no mods, no issues. I've been taping loud to very loud concerts but always using a regular BB with my R-09HR Line In (MM sells a really small bb, same size as a Zippo lighter). No distortion at all. Great mics all around.
Take care  :coolguy:

My measurements at 1k at 114 db unmodified indicate a distortion of almost 8% :) Now that's at 1k at lower frequencies I suspect that percentage would increase dramatically. They dont need a mod for some things.. But if you are in a loud concert they should be modified and never run with out a battery box. And besides that you will want to always use a foam in front of the capsule as there is no proper protection for fine Derbies from entering the front of the capsule and depositing them selves on the diaphragm or worse damaging the diaphragm part of my mod I put a fine brass mesh in front of the capsule so that the diaphragm is protected and RF shielded.

I might be a very lucky guy. I've never had any problems with my pair. Even at very loud concerts. You're correct about the foam protection.  ;)

Unless you measure db levels at the shows you go to with a calibrated db meter you might not be in as loud of a show as you think you are.

Chris



Well, Chris, I've been to terribly loud concerts for decades.
My ears are a very good tool to measure loudness. As longs as my recordings sound fine, I'm OK.
You might be right about the meter, but if a particular show starts to hurt my ears, well, I don't care about my mics or distortion, I care about my ears. In that case, I should not be there in the first place.
Take care
Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline bipton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: MM-HLSC-3or1 Battery Box necessary?
« Reply #11 on: March 03, 2009, 01:45:17 PM »
Thanks everyone for the feedback. Chris, what is the theory behind your 4.7k mod?

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: MM-HLSC-3or1 Battery Box necessary?
« Reply #12 on: March 04, 2009, 03:58:31 AM »
And besides that you will want to always use a foam in front of the capsule as there is no proper protection for fine Derbies from entering the front of the capsule and depositing them selves on the diaphragm or worse damaging the diaphragm part of my mod I put a fine brass mesh in front of the capsule so that the diaphragm is protected and RF shielded.

 ??? Canadian slang for dust?  :)

No dust is not really an issue.. Its more like metal particles or hair that can be a real problem for a capsule.
for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

Offline SparkE!

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 773
Re: MM-HLSC-3or1 Battery Box necessary?
« Reply #13 on: March 04, 2009, 01:54:45 PM »
And besides that you will want to always use a foam in front of the capsule as there is no proper protection for fine Derbies from entering the front of the capsule and depositing them selves on the diaphragm or worse damaging the diaphragm part of my mod I put a fine brass mesh in front of the capsule so that the diaphragm is protected and RF shielded.

 ??? Canadian slang for dust?  :)

No dust is not really an issue.. Its more like metal particles or hair that can be a real problem for a capsule.

This, gentlemen, is a fine Derby.  And let me tell you, she's hell on mics.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2009, 02:13:23 PM by SparkE! »
How'm I supposed to read your lips when you're talkin' out your ass? - Lern Tilton

Ignorance in audio is exceeded only by our collective willingness to embrace and foster it. -  Srajan Ebaen

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.065 seconds with 38 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF