Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Which soundcard for analog>24bit transfers?  (Read 3071 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sunjan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2006
  • Gender: Male
  • Taping since 1988, 28 years of fine recordings...
    • Just a handful of stuff I put on etree
Which soundcard for analog>24bit transfers?
« on: April 28, 2009, 05:40:50 PM »
I might be in the market for a new soundcard that I can use for analog transfers (cassette, vinyl, radio broadcasts etc).

I guess external is the way to go for avoiding interference. I'm game for either USB or Firewire, whichever is more trouble-free and reliable. Either new or used will do.

I'm not a musician, and most likely will never use it for lappy taping, so the only features I really need is 2xRCA in, a good 24bit ADC and decent XP support that won't drive me nuts installing it.

So what models are all you guys using?
And what is the sweet point for decent enough quality but still on a budget these days?
« Last Edit: April 29, 2009, 04:03:29 AM by sunjan »
Mics: A-51s LE, CK 930, Line Audo CM3, AT853Rx (hc,c,sc),  ECM 121, ECM 909A
Pres: Tinybox, CA-9100, UA5 wmod
Recorders: M10, H116 (CF mod), H340, NJB3
Gearbag: High Sierra Corkscrew
MD transfers: MZ-RH1. Tape transfers: Nak DR-1
Photo rig: Nikon D70, 18-70mm/3.5-4.5, SB-800

Offline bugg100

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1015
  • Gender: Male
Re: Which soundcard for analog>24bit transfers?
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2009, 05:58:00 PM »
Why not the UA-5 you already have?

Offline sunjan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2006
  • Gender: Male
  • Taping since 1988, 28 years of fine recordings...
    • Just a handful of stuff I put on etree
Re: Which soundcard for analog>24bit transfers?
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2009, 04:02:29 AM »
Why not the UA-5 you already have?

Yeah, I've been trying to hook it up, but I run into endless driver issues, and the incoming signal not being recognized (see separate thread).
I haven't given up on it completely yet, but ATM I just don't have time to do the troubleshooting.

I'm still curious to hear what the rest of you guys are running, and if there's any consensus on which boxes represent good value for money.
« Last Edit: April 29, 2009, 12:10:00 PM by sunjan »
Mics: A-51s LE, CK 930, Line Audo CM3, AT853Rx (hc,c,sc),  ECM 121, ECM 909A
Pres: Tinybox, CA-9100, UA5 wmod
Recorders: M10, H116 (CF mod), H340, NJB3
Gearbag: High Sierra Corkscrew
MD transfers: MZ-RH1. Tape transfers: Nak DR-1
Photo rig: Nikon D70, 18-70mm/3.5-4.5, SB-800

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18873
  • Gender: Male
Re: Which soundcard for analog>24bit transfers?
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2009, 08:10:20 AM »
I've always used whatever pre/ADC/recorder I happen to have at the time:  UA5, V3, 722, etc.  Unfortunately, I don't have one at the moment.

For archiving old cassettes and vinyl, my father uses an Edirol UA-25 with excellent results.  He could've spent a pile of money, but he's found -- like many others -- the upstream analog gear makes a far bigger difference in sound quality.
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) > Roland R-05

Offline page

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Gender: Male
  • #TeamRetired
Re: Which soundcard for analog>24bit transfers?
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2009, 11:29:30 AM »
I've always used whatever pre/ADC/recorder I happen to have at the time:  UA5, V3, 722, etc. 

One plus about the dedicated hardware is you don't have to fiddle with the software to record it, so if something crashes you don't lose anything or if you need your machine, you can do other stuff during the transfer.

I agree with Brian though, that my best transfer equipment is non-PC related.
"This is a common practice we have on the bus; debating facts that we could easily find through printed material. It's like, how far is it today? I think it's four hours, and someone else comes in at 11 hours, and well, then we'll... just... talk about it..." - Jeb Puryear

"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be." - Jim Williams

Offline digifish_music

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1016
    • digifish music
Re: Which soundcard for analog>24bit transfers?
« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2009, 08:56:35 AM »

I'm still curious to hear what the rest of you guys are running, and if there's any consensus on which boxes represent good value for money.

Creative X-Fi Xtreme Audio or Gamer make excellent 24 bit recordings.

http://www.soundblaster.com/products/product.asp?category=1&subcategory=873&product=15855&listby=usage

Inexpensive, compatible, rock-solid ASIO drivers and good. I have never noticed (or seen) any 'interference' on these cards, I have three in various production machines. 2 * Music Xtreme and 1 * Xtreme audio.

digifish
« Last Edit: April 30, 2009, 09:01:20 AM by digifish_music »
- What's this knob do?

Offline bgreen

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 611
  • Gender: Male
  • Live music taper and archivist
    • Live Music Preservation Project
Re: Which soundcard for analog>24bit transfers?
« Reply #6 on: May 01, 2009, 06:43:45 AM »
Creative's A/d isn't the best IMO.

I also use my tascam HD-p2 for transfers, but also have an m-audio 1010LT which is an ok low mid to mid range card. The tascam still does a better job IMO. I also have an (creative) EMu 1212M that is usable , but not as good in the A/D. M-audio has really nice external cards and breakouts as well if thats what you go with.

If I had to choose one card to use and $ wasn't an option, I would go something in the lynx line. Great cards from what I've heard.

http://www.lynxstudio.com/

M-audio would be the card I would look at if you don't want to drop a fortune.  Either way, make sure your RAM is maxed out if you go this route.

Offline Red Boink

  • Trade Count: (27)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 232
Re: Which soundcard for analog>24bit transfers?
« Reply #7 on: May 01, 2009, 05:53:53 PM »
I use a sound devices usb pre, and love it...

Hey, I have an Echo audiofire2 that is brand new sitting on a shelf unused.  If you're interested, drop me a line and we'll see what's up.  Echo makes excellent products for the price.  I got this one as a gift at the same time I'd ordered the Sound Devices usbpre, and I fell in with the SD....

 

Offline digifish_music

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1016
    • digifish music
Re: Which soundcard for analog>24bit transfers?
« Reply #8 on: May 01, 2009, 10:26:42 PM »
Creative's A/d isn't the best IMO.


What in particular don't you like about the X-Fi A/D or D/A? Indeed you need to be a little more specific as a few different chips are used throughout the range. In my experience I have nothing bad to say about the quality of the recording. Quiet, clean, natural.

http://techreport.com/articles.x/8884/17

digifish
« Last Edit: May 01, 2009, 10:32:48 PM by digifish_music »
- What's this knob do?

Offline B-GREEN

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Which soundcard for analog>24bit transfers?
« Reply #9 on: May 02, 2009, 10:30:47 PM »

What in particular don't you like about the X-Fi A/D or D/A? Indeed you need to be a little more specific as a few different chips are used throughout the range. In my experience I have nothing bad to say about the quality of the recording. Quiet, clean, natural.

http://techreport.com/articles.x/8884/17

digifish

I'm not saying the card sucks, but when I compared creative, which is basically a consumer model card, to pro model cards, it is what it is. The comparisons your link shows are more or less other consumer model cards and in that field the X-fi does well. I've tried creatives cards from soundblaster to EMU and I was never as happy with them as I am m-audio and other stand alone A/d's. I think the m-audio products give a clearer, more exact representation of what I'm transferring and neither the m-audio or any model of creative will ever hold a candle to lynx, but again, this is all subjective and personal preference. I personally wouldn't have any of there product in my transfer and post production process, but thats just me. not saying your wrong, just saying I've never liked them enough to stick with them. 

Offline sunjan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2006
  • Gender: Male
  • Taping since 1988, 28 years of fine recordings...
    • Just a handful of stuff I put on etree
Re: Which soundcard for analog>24bit transfers?
« Reply #10 on: May 04, 2009, 03:32:34 AM »
Hey, I have an Echo audiofire2 that is brand new sitting on a shelf unused.  If you're interested, drop me a line and we'll see what's up.  

Thanks a lot for the offer! I heard a lot of good things about Echo, but I guess you're in the US, which makes me apprehensive about shipping and taxes.
EU customs can be a b*tch sometimes :P
I only buy gear from stateside when I know somebody travelling there who can bring it back. So ATM it doesn't work out for me...

Talking about Creative, I do have an Audigy 4 Pro sitting on my shelf, but I always assumed it was sub-standard for analog transfers (compared to just using an Iriver for 16bit). Maybe I should give it a go???
Mics: A-51s LE, CK 930, Line Audo CM3, AT853Rx (hc,c,sc),  ECM 121, ECM 909A
Pres: Tinybox, CA-9100, UA5 wmod
Recorders: M10, H116 (CF mod), H340, NJB3
Gearbag: High Sierra Corkscrew
MD transfers: MZ-RH1. Tape transfers: Nak DR-1
Photo rig: Nikon D70, 18-70mm/3.5-4.5, SB-800

Offline bgreen

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 611
  • Gender: Male
  • Live music taper and archivist
    • Live Music Preservation Project
Re: Which soundcard for analog>24bit transfers?
« Reply #11 on: May 05, 2009, 12:22:47 PM »

Talking about Creative, I do have an Audigy 4 Pro sitting on my shelf, but I always assumed it was sub-standard for analog transfers (compared to just using an Iriver for 16bit). Maybe I should give it a go???

It's all going to be subjective. I wouldn't use/recommend creative myself based on past experience and the research I've done, but if you already have it, put it in and try it. See what you think, and go from there.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2009, 05:19:30 PM by bgreen »

Offline Scooter123

  • "I am not an alcoholic. I am a drunk. Drunks don't go to meetings."
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3817
Re: Which soundcard for analog>24bit transfers?
« Reply #12 on: May 06, 2009, 11:28:16 AM »
Echo Layla is what I use.

It has XLR inputs and a headphone jack and separate headphone amp. 
Regards,
Scooter123

mk41 > N Box  > Sony M-10
mk4 > N Box > Sony M-10

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF