Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Tascam Dr-2d vs Dr-40  (Read 3772 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline techgui

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 105
Tascam Dr-2d vs Dr-40
« on: July 18, 2012, 10:21:12 AM »
  I currently have a Dr-2d and I'm very happy with it.  However, now I need to buy a 2nd recorder for use at work.  Originally I planned to purchase another Dr-2r...  But now I'm wondering if the Dr-40 is a better value.  Most of my recordings will be made directly from the balanced monitor outputs from a Bose L1 speaker PA system.   Though less frequently I will use the internal cards or input from a wireless countryman E6 head mic. 
 
  One of the biggest features of the Dr-2d, for me,  is the ability to record a second track at a lower volume.  After reviewing the user manual, it appears the Dr-40 can do the same thing. 

  Any thoughts?  I really like how elegant the Dr-2d looks, but it appears the Dr-40 does everything the the Dr-2d does and more....

Offline techgui

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 105
Re: Tascam Dr-2d vs Dr-40
« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2012, 10:48:08 AM »
After more searching, I've found only one big limitation.  I don't think you can record from both the external mic's and the line in at the same time.  Four channel recording has to include the internal mics.  That would be a deal breaker for my home use, but I don't anticipate needing that feature at work. 


Offline cd2go

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 531
  • Gender: Male
    • Strictly Slambovian
Re: Tascam Dr-2d vs Dr-40
« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2012, 05:21:06 PM »
Four channel recording has to include the internal mics.

Correct, there is only one input, the XLR combo jacks that can be line/mic/mic with P48. It's a great little box, I just got one to run behind my MixPre. I get about 16 hours record time from Energizer lithiums going line-in with zero gain on the deck, 24/96.

Offline LikeASong

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 520
  • Gender: Male
    • U2start.com
Re: Tascam Dr-2d vs Dr-40
« Reply #3 on: July 18, 2012, 07:33:58 PM »
Yep, on the DR-40 2 of the channels MUST be from the stereo internal mics. My friend Pridix found out that after he'd bought the recorder :(
The worst things in the world are justified by belief.
-U2

After silence, that which comes nearest to expressing the inexpressible is music.
-Aldous Huxley

Offline bdasilva

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1358
  • Gender: Male
  • Use to be a Fishhead
Re: Tascam Dr-2d vs Dr-40
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2012, 01:39:44 AM »
I have to tell you   I love My  DR-40... those internal mics are decent... you can set the delay for channel 1 (int mics) vs channel 2 (xlrs)...  battery life is all night... for 150$  a steal

http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=130725187757+&item=130725187757&lgeo=1&vectorid=229466
Cad E300S set.. AT822  AKG C 414 B-XLS/ST  
Dorsey-Mod MK-012 w/ O, C, H and RED L/D Caps
Superlux S502 ORTF   LSD2
Silverpath  Cables> 
Tascam DR-680MKii    DR- 680 (X2)   Tascam DR-40     Sound Devices USBPre    SONY  PMD-M10   Zoom F8

"Buy a Taper a Drink... Prime the Pumps of live Music"


               On the "music" side of the "Music Business"

Offline techgui

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 105
Re: Tascam Dr-2d vs Dr-40
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2012, 02:21:17 PM »
As much as I like delaying one channel for solo voice, it's something I can do on post.  I haven't used the DR-40 so I can't speak for the the internal mics, but I can say the Dr-2d's are pretty good and they are also cards rather than Omni's.  I like the robust XLR inputs on the Dr-40, I also like the portability of the Dr-2d. 

To make a long story short, I purchased a 2nd Dr-2d for $150.   

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.057 seconds with 30 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF