0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: greppson on February 15, 2005, 10:08:20 AMQuote from: Humbug on February 15, 2005, 08:51:42 AMQuote from: greppson on February 14, 2005, 03:05:28 PMI'm new to this board and new to taping, but I've been in the trading community for a while.I decided to go with the CMC-2As. In talking with Chris at SoundPros, it sounded like the CMC-2As are very close to the AT831s, but they were able to make them a little bit cheap then using AT831s. Maybe he is biased, but he also said that everyone at SP feels they function just a SLIGHT bit better than the AT831s.For me, being a "newbie" taper, I'll give them a shot.+t for being brave, and taking the plunge. Please let us know how you get on.How do you like the CMC-2? Got any tapes uploaded to the archive I could check out?
Quote from: Humbug on February 15, 2005, 08:51:42 AMQuote from: greppson on February 14, 2005, 03:05:28 PMI'm new to this board and new to taping, but I've been in the trading community for a while.I decided to go with the CMC-2As. In talking with Chris at SoundPros, it sounded like the CMC-2As are very close to the AT831s, but they were able to make them a little bit cheap then using AT831s. Maybe he is biased, but he also said that everyone at SP feels they function just a SLIGHT bit better than the AT831s.For me, being a "newbie" taper, I'll give them a shot.+t for being brave, and taking the plunge. Please let us know how you get on.
Quote from: greppson on February 14, 2005, 03:05:28 PMI'm new to this board and new to taping, but I've been in the trading community for a while.I decided to go with the CMC-2As. In talking with Chris at SoundPros, it sounded like the CMC-2As are very close to the AT831s, but they were able to make them a little bit cheap then using AT831s. Maybe he is biased, but he also said that everyone at SP feels they function just a SLIGHT bit better than the AT831s.For me, being a "newbie" taper, I'll give them a shot.