Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: DPA 4060/61’s vs. Shoeps MK2H/MK2S/MK3  (Read 3354 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline noam

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 185
DPA 4060/61’s vs. Shoeps MK2H/MK2S/MK3
« on: August 25, 2006, 11:05:37 AM »
I am considering getting the Shoeps MK2S capsules to use with their KCY active cables>Sonosax, for situations that require omnis (for cardioids I use the MK4’s.) The DPA 4060/61’s have the advantage of smaller size (for stealthing). Even the Schoeps catalogue says:” A pressure transducer with ideal response in all situations does not exist. A very small capsule could allow the high-frequency response to be flat regardless of direct- or diffuse-field placement, but such small capsules are quite noisy.” But the DPA’s are not noisy (and have a high-frequency emphasis.) Anyone compared the DPA’s to any of the Shoeps with the high-frequency emphasis (MK2H/S/MK3)?

Noam

Offline SClassical

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 821
  • Gender: Male
Re: DPA 4060/61’s vs. Shoeps MK2H/MK2S/MK3
« Reply #1 on: August 28, 2006, 05:30:45 PM »
Yes, I compared them. I really like the 2S. The 2S are excellent mics for classical music. I've made some good and bad recordings with the 4060s but nearly all my 2S recordings sounded excellent. What omni mics do you have or you only have the Car MK4s?
Mics: DPA3552 kit/DPA3521 kit/DPA SMK4081 kit/DPA SMK4060 kit/Schoeps 2X MK21, 2X MK22 and 2X MK4v and 2X Schoeps CCM2S
Mixers/preamps: Sonosax SX-M32/Sonosax SX-M2 LS/Grace Design V3/DPA MMA6000/Millennia HV-32P
Recorders: SD722/PCM-D50/MT2
Playback: Grace m903 - Sennheiser HD650 / Bowers & Wilkins Nautilus 805s

RebelRebel

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: DPA 4060/61’s vs. Shoeps MK2H/MK2S/MK3
« Reply #2 on: August 28, 2006, 07:17:26 PM »
For loud music, the small mics from DPA are fine, but for quiet material, I have found them to be way too noisy. they are good for spot mics, percussion, etc, but as a main pair..they didnt cut it for me(coupled with the fact that I am a clumsy jackass and was afraid I would break them). The schoeps MK2S are fantastic microphones..no denying that. They are standards in the professional classical recording realm. (check out Simon Eadons recordings of beethoven string quartets..those were grammy winning, made with only a pair of schoeps MK2S and a jecklin disc) I have several pairs of the CMC62S. while we are talking about DPA, I would also suggest looking at the DPA 4006. I just bought 3 of those for a decca tree configuration, and absolutely love them!


BUT>>>>>

the cream of the crop..the mother of all omnis, in my opinion is the Gefell MK221 with Josephson C617 bodies. ...they are measurement mics, and as such are ruler flat, and incredibly sensitive!

Teddy

Offline noam

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 185
Re: DPA 4060/61’s vs. Shoeps MK2H/MK2S/MK3
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2006, 12:50:11 PM »
Thanks for your comments. That was the last push I needed to spend the money on the MK2S. I got them on Friday and will report once I get to use them. In the meantime, I also upgraded from HiMD to the SONY PCM D1. Maybe you can help me with that one too – I posted some questions about it on the Recording Gear board today.

The advice I have been getting on this forum has been extremely helpful and much more reliable than any I got from dealers (who all just try to push the equipment they are selling and trash what they’re not selling.)

Noam

Offline lobitz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: DPA 4060/61’s vs. Shoeps MK2H/MK2S/MK3
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2006, 01:27:09 AM »
If you'd like to check out a recording done with CMC62S > SD722 I put my one of my recordings from moe.down up on archive.org. 
http://www.archive.org/details/moe2006-09-01.cmc62s.flac16
rig:  Schoeps MK4V, MK41, MK2S, CMC6, CMBi > SD 722 etc...

Offline SonicSound

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1569
  • Gender: Male
Re: DPA 4060/61’s vs. Shoeps MK2H/MK2S/MK3
« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2006, 11:42:01 AM »
This probably is too late, but did you consider selling the MK4's and getting the MK5's. This would give you two options in one capsule.  Not sure if there are any MK2S / MK5 comps/opinions
SD: Schoeps  M222/NT222's & CMC6's - MK 41V's, 21's, 5's, 8's
LD: Microtech Gefell UM900's, Shure KSM44's
V3, 744t

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.059 seconds with 30 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF