Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: generally speaking (csb vs at829)  (Read 3924 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kidrocklive

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
  • Gender: Male
  • If it's real, You'll feel it!
    • My Trade List
generally speaking (csb vs at829)
« on: February 08, 2008, 06:42:16 AM »
would going from csb mics to the sp-cmc1 (at829) with the SP-8 but an upgrade, downgrade or same level? I didn't really notice any difference but I just was curious from a technical standpoint.

Thanks in advance  :).

Offline kidrocklive

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
  • Gender: Male
  • If it's real, You'll feel it!
    • My Trade List
Re: generally speaking (csb vs at829)
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2008, 05:05:14 PM »
was something wrong with my question?

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: generally speaking (csb vs at829)
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2008, 05:37:41 PM »
The 829s are cardiod mics..the csbs are just standard binaural mics i believe. Could be wrond.

Alchemy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: generally speaking (csb vs at829)
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2008, 06:06:34 PM »
That's right nameloc. The problem is that the two mics are not very comparable. Each would be used for a different situation.

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: generally speaking (csb vs at829)
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2008, 06:18:57 PM »
Right. I prefer using cardiods myself. I havent touched a pair of bi's in about 3 years.

Offline kidrocklive

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
  • Gender: Male
  • If it's real, You'll feel it!
    • My Trade List
Re: generally speaking (csb vs at829)
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2008, 07:12:36 PM »
oh my bad, I didn't connect that in my brain lol

Offline mr qpl

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 516
Re: generally speaking (csb vs at829)
« Reply #6 on: February 13, 2008, 10:38:03 AM »
Right. I prefer using cardiods myself. I havent touched a pair of bi's in about 3 years.

 :o

Offline Belexes

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
  • Gender: Male
Re: generally speaking (csb vs at829)
« Reply #7 on: February 13, 2008, 11:10:12 AM »
I havent touched a pair of bi's in about 3 years.

You had a pair of them? Lucky you!  ;D
Busman Audio BSC1-K1/K2/K3/K4 > HiHo Silver XLR's > Deck TBD

CA-14 (c,o)/MM-HLSC-1 (4.7k mod)/AT853(4.7k mod)(c,o,h,sc)/CAFS (o)/CA-1 (o) > CA-9100 (V. 4.1)/CA-9200/CA-UBB > Sony PCM-D50/Sony PCM-M10

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: generally speaking (csb vs at829)
« Reply #8 on: February 13, 2008, 03:26:33 PM »
Sp bi's not csbs. actually i just gave them away with a mzr3 and bb.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.05 seconds with 33 queries.
© 2002-2025 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF