0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: hippies on April 04, 2003, 11:09:31 AMthat being said, i probably wouldn't recommend this to someone looking to go analog in to the unit.
Quote from: Tim on April 02, 2003, 03:55:24 PMOne more thing that is tangently related to this, if the JB3 is not a viable alternative then I say hold onto your DAT machines as it looks like it could be a while before we have a good, reliable and affordable HD solution.
Quote from: jpschust on April 04, 2003, 12:31:58 PMGeoff to respond to your question from before, I've got no difference betweeh the original and my source. I've lietened to both a few times now and they sound EXACTLY the same.
Quote from: geoff piper on April 04, 2003, 11:36:19 AMthank you for that explination. What i got from this quote is that newbie patchers should go JB3 Newbies witha full rig should go dat or laptop? Is that correct?
Quote from: hippies on April 04, 2003, 01:51:33 PMQuote from: geoff piper on April 04, 2003, 11:36:19 AMthank you for that explination. What i got from this quote is that newbie patchers should go JB3 Newbies witha full rig should go dat or laptop? Is that correct?what i'm saying is that i think an outboard A/D in front of the JB3 would be in your best interests. whether patching a full rig, or running your own. the A/D in the JB3 is not the best. if you have the means to go the Laptop route, then this changes things altogether. by all means, go with a Laptop. get yourself a splitter, and you should have no trouble patching with a Laptop even. build your rig up from there.