Topic: R-4 splitting up a 24/96 file on its own?

[GroundHog420]

Hey, all - this is all great information. Thanks for helping to clear up some of these details. Admittedly, it's just more of a personal curiosity for me than a pressing concern, as I generally wouldn't hit that limit, but I do think it's good to understand the logic behind some of the processes we deal with. I will indeed look back at my documentation to see if I've missed anything else, but thanks again in the meantime!

[BayTaynt3d]

You DEFINITELY want to leave this on. There's no downside, only upside, you have everything to gain and nothing to lose, it's a no-brainer.

[GroundHog420]

Ummm... not trying to be an ass or anything, but I see a lot of posts like this on differnet forums, and it really doesn't tell me much of anything.

I'm assuming you're referring to the part of the discussion about the file split limit feature, but nothing is quoted or anything, so I have to guess at that.

Also, it really helps if when folks make a definitive statement like this, it's accompanied by some sort of technical explanation as to why it's such a good idea. Otherwise when folks get out and try different things, they don't really have a clear understanding as to why they're doing it; other than someone told them they should do it.

Again, thanks, but I see stuff like this all the time, and then I have to keep going back and forth asking more questions until I get it, and I bet there are a few other folks who experience the same thing. Thanks for any additional details you can offer!

You DEFINITELY want to leave this on. There's no downside, only upside, you have everything to gain and nothing to lose, it's a no-brainer.

[BayTaynt3d]

Well, as others have said in this thread already, the advantage is that you will have a complete recording vs. an incomplete recording. So unless you want to risk the file stopping at the file size limit and having nothing left of a recording beyond that point, I'd make sure you leave the splitting functionality on.