Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: ADC comp: NJB3 v. D100 - wanna hear?  (Read 8495 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

silverbullet

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:ADC comp: NJB3 v. D100 - wanna hear?
« Reply #30 on: May 18, 2004, 08:52:08 AM »
I've ran a couple of tests myself taping live music in bars. NMJ3 vs DAT vs MD. In short I preferred DAT then MD then NMJ3 but this was before the latest firmware for the NMJ3. The levels on the NMJ3 seem to work now and I don't clip my recordings as easily on the NMJ3. The main difference I seem to remember is better bass sound on the DAT. I've only done a couple of live recordings with the NMJ3 since the updated firmware and I'm pretty happy. The wav file looks normalized when graphed!? Most of it all shaved and linear, hardly any peaks and troughs. strange to me. Anyway, with the fast music transfer to computer via firewire I will be doing more NMJ3 recordings in bars but for big shows I'll bring my DAT or if I have to stealth it then a MD.

Nobody's had any problems bringing in a NMJ3 during a pat down check ??? (looks like a cd player)
« Last Edit: May 18, 2004, 08:54:20 AM by silverbullet »

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18886
  • Gender: Male
Re: ADC comp: NJB3 v. D100 - wanna hear?
« Reply #31 on: October 17, 2005, 12:07:12 PM »
The comparison is now available on tapers.org in the gear comparisons directory.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2005, 12:14:42 PM by Brian Skalinder »
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.035 seconds with 43 queries.
© 2002-2020 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF