Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: 24/48 to 16/44 conversion introducing clipping...  (Read 24315 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline breakonthru

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 263
Re: 24/48 to 16/44 conversion introducing clipping...
« Reply #15 on: April 07, 2024, 08:50:02 PM »
Sample Rate Conversion (SRC) can introduce peak levels beyond 0 dbfs due to interpolation. So the order of operations is the key.

Gordon
there was a huge debate about this
“Intersample overs” back in the day when benchmark introduced the DAC 2. While I generally find the technical discussions of John Siau to be impenetrable, the “community” as it were just poo-poo’d the idea as if it wasn’t a thing, or at least not as significant as benchmark made it out to be

https://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/application_notes/intersample-overs-in-cd-recordings

Offline tim in jersey

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3852
  • Gender: Male
Re: 24/48 to 16/44 conversion introducing clipping...
« Reply #16 on: April 07, 2024, 11:21:29 PM »
I use Sound Forge and normalize to 98.14% (not sure what the dB value of that is), and then dither with iZotope's mbit process.  I never noticed any clipping after dithering.


Looks like 98.14% is about -0.16dB.

I was just coming to post that! :D

I'm curious as to the math behind y'all coming up with that number. Care to enlighten me?

Offline nulldogmas

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1840
    • How I Escaped My Uncertain Fate
Re: 24/48 to 16/44 conversion introducing clipping...
« Reply #17 on: April 08, 2024, 12:31:12 AM »
I'm curious as to the math behind y'all coming up with that number. Care to enlighten me?


Offline Chilly Brioschi

  • Get out, see live music !
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15833
  • Gender: Male
  • Waiting for the next cladogenetic event, or Godot
    • Oceana North America
Re: 24/48 to 16/44 conversion introducing clipping...
« Reply #18 on: April 01, 2025, 08:20:49 AM »
FWIW, the sharpest mastering engineer that I know says -3db, and why not -6db for 24 bit?
Let those peaks breathe!

Pop music be damned
"Peace is for everyone"
        - Norah Jones

"Music is the drug that won't kill you"
         - Fran Lebowitz

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 16429
  • Gender: Male
  • We create auditory illusions, not reproductions
Re: 24/48 to 16/44 conversion introducing clipping...
« Reply #19 on: April 01, 2025, 09:57:03 AM »
Goldilocks middle way.  Not too much, not too little.  No need to overcompensate when normalizing by trying to get it as close to 0dBFS as possible.  Just need enough extra space so the complete waveform doesn't get chopped off at the top.

If peaks are way down then normalize to a peak level closer to 0dBFS. If unsure exactly how high that peak actually goes because it might happen to crest in between two sample points (an intersample over) choose a slightly lower target peak value.  That's it.  One or two dB down from 0 is plenty and equates to a more or less insignificant difference in the position of the listeners playback volume knob. 

-3dBFS is not unreasonable. ..and that or even -6dB is likely what a mastering engineer would prefer to receive from a client.  But a target of -6dBFS as a target for final release gains nothing and will require additional playback gain to compensate, as it will most likely sound significantly quieter than whatever is played before or after.  The additional 3dB of empty space gains nothing. -6dBFS is totally fine as a "released as it was recorded peak level" that isn't so low it really needs normalization to be listenable, yet is an overly low target for final normalization of a finished recording where levels are being actively adjusted in post production.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline rocksuitcase

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8781
  • Gender: Male
    • RockSuitcase: stage photography
Re: 24/48 to 16/44 conversion introducing clipping...
« Reply #20 on: April 01, 2025, 01:30:17 PM »
I do not normalize, I add gain up to -0.2dB to my final wav 24/48 files.
I *may* convert down to 16/44.1 for some odd reason, but gave that up as a workflow habit many years ago.
music IS love

When you get confused, listen to the music play!

Mics:         AKG460|CK61|CK1|CK3|CK8|Beyer M 201E|DPA 4060 SK
Recorders:Marantz PMD661 OADE Concert mod; Tascam DR680 MKI x2; Sony PCM-M10

Offline nulldogmas

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1840
    • How I Escaped My Uncertain Fate
Re: 24/48 to 16/44 conversion introducing clipping...
« Reply #21 on: April 01, 2025, 02:25:10 PM »
I do not normalize, I add gain up to -0.2dB to my final wav 24/48 files.

Isn't "adding gain up to X dB" exactly what normalizing is?

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 16429
  • Gender: Male
  • We create auditory illusions, not reproductions
Re: 24/48 to 16/44 conversion introducing clipping...
« Reply #22 on: April 01, 2025, 02:31:12 PM »
it is.  Was just typing the reply below..

I do not normalize, I add gain up to -0.2dB to my final wav 24/48 files.
[..snip]

That is normalizing.  What you describe is the process you use to achieve the desired normalization of level.

There are various ways to do it, which including tools that automatically calculate how much gain to add to reach the desired target level.  Complicating things is the often unstated "level of what?".  We're talking about peak levels not being overly low nor exceeding 0db Full Scale.  But level normalization could also be referring to loudness normalization, which is a perceptual measure that relates more to RMS value normalization or some measure other than "peak".
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline rocksuitcase

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8781
  • Gender: Male
    • RockSuitcase: stage photography
Re: 24/48 to 16/44 conversion introducing clipping...
« Reply #23 on: April 01, 2025, 02:34:01 PM »
I do not normalize, I add gain up to -0.2dB to my final wav 24/48 files.

Isn't "adding gain up to X dB" exactly what normalizing is?
YES and NO.  >:D Not "exactly".
Depends on which type of normalization.
https://www.izotope.com/en/learn/audio-normalization.html
 
Peak vs. Loudness Normalization:

    Peak Normalization: Focuses on adjusting the gain to bring the loudest peak of the audio to a target level.

Loudness Normalization: Adjusts the gain to bring the average loudness of the audio to a target level, often measured in LUFS (Loudness Units relative to Full Scale).

So given all that, I prefer to do it "manually" so to speak.
music IS love

When you get confused, listen to the music play!

Mics:         AKG460|CK61|CK1|CK3|CK8|Beyer M 201E|DPA 4060 SK
Recorders:Marantz PMD661 OADE Concert mod; Tascam DR680 MKI x2; Sony PCM-M10

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.044 seconds with 37 queries.
© 2002-2025 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF