Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Noob Schoeps "amplifier" questions (CMC1U, etc)  (Read 3747 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 16912
  • Gender: Male
  • We create auditory illusions, not reproductions
Re: Noob Schoeps "amplifier" questions (CMC1U, etc)
« Reply #15 on: May 07, 2026, 06:16:38 PM »
+T to Gordon.

I'm not speculating on this one. But I bet most agree the microphone capsule is the part that matters most. My overarching view is that the most difficult, challenging and rewarding things to get right are those which involve conversion from one medium to another.  As applied to an audio recording and reproduction chain, the hardest parts to get right are the transducers at both ends along with any conversions made by the transmission/storage-medium in between. Manipulations within a single medium might still be challenging but are easier. Electrical aspects such as buffering, amplification, impedance balancing, filtering, etc. all lie within the electrical domain.

The first line of my TS post signature reflects those critical conversions between different domains.  Here's the core of it expanded, excluding the most critical performance/experiential parts at either end!

Microphone capsule converts variations of sound pressure to variations of voltage.
ADC converts voltages to numbers.
/Tape head converts voltages to magnetic flux.
/Cutter converts voltages to a squiggly engraving.
/Radio transmitter converts voltages into radio waves.
DAC converts numbers back to voltages.
/Tape head converts varying magnetic flux back to voltages.
/Cartridge converts squiggly engraving to voltages.
/Radio receiver converts radio waves into voltages.
Speaker drivers convert voltages into variations of sound pressure.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to for the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: Version 4 provided in individual sections rather than a single booklet)

Offline fanofjam

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 736
Re: Noob Schoeps "amplifier" questions (CMC1U, etc)
« Reply #16 on: May 07, 2026, 07:30:59 PM »
^  It would be interesting to compare a Riotbox to a Tinybox.

Well, my buddy owns my old Tinybox configured to Schoeps nbobs. Also have a Riotbox configured for nbobs.  Might be worth trying to do this at some point in the future.

Gordon did this with Gefell caps!  Tested Nbobs against the new 400 bodies.  It was extremely hard to tell a difference.  It's not a few thousand dollar difference.   

If you're talking just active cables vs bodies, then yeah.  But in the earlier discussion some of us were also including preamps in the discussion...nbox vs riotbox vs tinybox. 
Mic Capsules:  Schoeps MK4 x 2, MK41 x 2, MK4S x 2, MK3 x 2, MK21 x 2, MK8 x 1, M934b x 5, M241 x 4, Nakamichi CP-701 x 2, CP-702 x 2
Mic Bodies: Schoeps m222 tubes, Schoeps CMC-4 (modified for 48v phantom), Schoeps CMMT-30 x 5, Nakamichi CM-700 x 2
Active Cable Systems:  Schoeps KCY, Schoeps Modded KC5, Schoeps nbob and extensions
Recorders: SD788t x 2, Zoom F6, SD MixPre-3i, Deity PR-2, Zoom F3, Marantz PMD-661, Tascam DR-100i, Marantz PMD-620, Korg MR-1
Preamps:  Sonosax SX-M2D2, Schoeps VMS-5U, Schoeps VMS-52UB x 2, Schoeps VMS-42UB, Schoeps VMS-02IB, Riotbox, Cooper CSPA-1
Misc: Benchmark Sonic AD2K+, Rycote Softie Screens, Movo Screens, Rycote INV mounts

Offline grawk

  • Trade Count: (13)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1013
  • Gender: Male
Re: Noob Schoeps "amplifier" questions (CMC1U, etc)
« Reply #17 on: May 07, 2026, 07:51:42 PM »
It’s all still just audio pathways. So the comparisons are always apples to apples. Especially if the capsule remains the same.

I’ve tried baby nbox, pfas, and riotbox.  I ended up going with cmc6s and cmc1ls because I could tell a difference with the material I was recording.

But like I said, there are tradeoffs.
Schoeps DMS (cmc1L4v/8) - CMC641v - DPA 4015gs - Sennheiser Ambeo - Nohype SRM-1 - Sennheiser 416T - Neumann KK14
Sonosax AD8+/R4+/M2D2 - Lectrosonics SPDR - Tascam FR-AV2 - Deity PR2 - DPA MMA:A

Offline beroti_music

  • Trade Count: (46)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Noob Schoeps "amplifier" questions (CMC1U, etc)
« Reply #18 on: May 07, 2026, 09:16:19 PM »
^
Same. And the difference wasn't subtle.

I liked the baby nbox the least.
Then Riotbox and then CMBI.

The CMBI smoked them all to be honest, but it's a bit more tricky to stealth maybe.

If I'd to buy new i'd go for cmc1l as well.
mics schoeps mk22/mk4 | nakamichi cm-300 (JB mod/cp1/cp2/cp3) | primo em4052pmi4's/nakamichi cp3 (JB mod | sp-cmc-4u/at-u853 4.7k mod (line cards/h/c/sc)
power schoeps cmbi (pair) | ca-9200 | ca-ubb (2x)  
recorder roland r-05 (5x)  
video panasonic zs100 | panasonic hdc-sd600 | sony hx9v | sony hx50v | samsung s23 ultra
playback fiio m17
headphones final d8000 | sony wh-1000xm3 | beyerdynamic dt770 pro | akg k271 mk II
youtube https://www.youtube.com/@beroti_music

Offline noahbickart

  • phishrabbi
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 2581
  • Gender: Male
  • So now I wander over grounds of light...
Re: Noob Schoeps "amplifier" questions (CMC1U, etc)
« Reply #19 on: May 08, 2026, 11:27:27 AM »
When you guys tested the difference between the options did you do so knowing which was which? If so, psychology is likely as much a factor as auditory perception.

Lots of people claim, for example, to be able to hear massive differences between digital and power cables. Which don't exist.
Recording:
Capsules: Schoeps mk41v (x2), mk22 (x2), mk3 (x2), mk21 & mk8
Cables: 2x nbob KCY, 1 pair nbob actives, GAKables 10' & 20' 6-channel snakes, Darktrain 2 & 4 channel KCY and mini xlr extensions:
Preamps:    Schoeps VMS 02iub, Naiant IPA, Sound Devices Mixpre6 I
Recorders: Sound Devices Mixpre6 I, Sony PCM m10

Home Playback: Mac Mini> Mytek Brooklyn+> McIntosh MC162> Eminent Tech LFT-16; Musical Fidelity xCan v2> Hifiman HE-4XX / Beyerdynamic DT880

Office Playback: iMac> Grace m903> AKG k701 / Hifiman HE-400

Offline papabliss

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Noob Schoeps "amplifier" questions (CMC1U, etc)
« Reply #20 on: May 08, 2026, 01:53:42 PM »
I've listen to them blind with samples only identified as A & B. You had to follow up after you made your choice.
The sound was close but the mic amp won over the PFA.

Offline noahbickart

  • phishrabbi
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 2581
  • Gender: Male
  • So now I wander over grounds of light...
Re: Noob Schoeps "amplifier" questions (CMC1U, etc)
« Reply #21 on: May 08, 2026, 01:55:27 PM »
I've listen to them blind with samples only identified as A & B. You had to follow up after you made your choice.
The sound was close but the mic amp won over the PFA.

This strikes me as eminently reasonable.
Recording:
Capsules: Schoeps mk41v (x2), mk22 (x2), mk3 (x2), mk21 & mk8
Cables: 2x nbob KCY, 1 pair nbob actives, GAKables 10' & 20' 6-channel snakes, Darktrain 2 & 4 channel KCY and mini xlr extensions:
Preamps:    Schoeps VMS 02iub, Naiant IPA, Sound Devices Mixpre6 I
Recorders: Sound Devices Mixpre6 I, Sony PCM m10

Home Playback: Mac Mini> Mytek Brooklyn+> McIntosh MC162> Eminent Tech LFT-16; Musical Fidelity xCan v2> Hifiman HE-4XX / Beyerdynamic DT880

Office Playback: iMac> Grace m903> AKG k701 / Hifiman HE-400

Offline papabliss

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Noob Schoeps "amplifier" questions (CMC1U, etc)
« Reply #22 on: May 08, 2026, 09:28:23 PM »
It’s all still just audio pathways. So the comparisons are always apples to apples. Especially if the capsule remains the same.

I’ve tried baby nbox, pfas, and riotbox.  I ended up going with cmc6s and cmc1ls because I could tell a difference with the material I was recording.

But like I said, there are tradeoffs.

Between the PFA and the Riotbox, which ranks higher? How much and noticeable is that difference?

Offline grawk

  • Trade Count: (13)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1013
  • Gender: Male
Re: Noob Schoeps "amplifier" questions (CMC1U, etc)
« Reply #23 on: May 08, 2026, 09:30:53 PM »
My personal ranking is cmc1>riotbox>pfa>baby nbox.

That said whatever floats your boat and gets you out there recording. We’re a dying breed. Do what keeps you excited.
Schoeps DMS (cmc1L4v/8) - CMC641v - DPA 4015gs - Sennheiser Ambeo - Nohype SRM-1 - Sennheiser 416T - Neumann KK14
Sonosax AD8+/R4+/M2D2 - Lectrosonics SPDR - Tascam FR-AV2 - Deity PR2 - DPA MMA:A

Offline darby

  • Trade Count: (114)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1377
  • Support artists and venues that allow recording
Re: Noob Schoeps "amplifier" questions (CMC1U, etc)
« Reply #24 on: May 08, 2026, 11:01:45 PM »
I rarely use PFAs because I have too many better options
I have had noise issues with them when handling which is rare, but has happened

the Baby NBox does not have as much lower end response as the RiotBox
which is up there with the Platinum NBox

the cmc1u and Ls are the smoothest

I owned cmc1Ks and sold them because NBobs were easier for me to handle

Offline beroti_music

  • Trade Count: (46)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Noob Schoeps "amplifier" questions (CMC1U, etc)
« Reply #25 on: May 09, 2026, 02:23:30 PM »

That said whatever floats your boat and gets you out there recording. We’re a dying breed. Do what keeps you excited.

I agree!
mics schoeps mk22/mk4 | nakamichi cm-300 (JB mod/cp1/cp2/cp3) | primo em4052pmi4's/nakamichi cp3 (JB mod | sp-cmc-4u/at-u853 4.7k mod (line cards/h/c/sc)
power schoeps cmbi (pair) | ca-9200 | ca-ubb (2x)  
recorder roland r-05 (5x)  
video panasonic zs100 | panasonic hdc-sd600 | sony hx9v | sony hx50v | samsung s23 ultra
playback fiio m17
headphones final d8000 | sony wh-1000xm3 | beyerdynamic dt770 pro | akg k271 mk II
youtube https://www.youtube.com/@beroti_music

Offline jbell

  • Team Dirty South
  • Trade Count: (152)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4770
  • Gender: Male
  • Spreadicated
Re: Noob Schoeps "amplifier" questions (CMC1U, etc)
« Reply #26 on: May 10, 2026, 08:38:50 AM »
I rarely use PFAs because I have too many better options
I have had noise issues with them when handling which is rare, but has happened

the Baby NBox does not have as much lower end response as the RiotBox
which is up there with the Platinum NBox

the cmc1u and Ls are the smoothest

I owned cmc1Ks and sold them because NBobs were easier for me to handle

This is why I like the Schoeps KCY setup!  It is super taper friendly.  One cable makes setup and breakdown really quick and it's a really small footprint.  I've run lots of mics over the years and I feel Schoeps KCY is one of the best mic setups for what we do.
4 Channels
Neumann kk 184's, kk 185's > Nbob KCY > Naiant PFA | Schoeps mk41's > KCY 250/ 05 Ig > Naiant PFA > Sound Devices Mixpre 10 II @32/48

2 Channels
Schoeps mk41's > KCY 250/ 05 Ig > Riotbox > Sony PCM A10 @ 24/48

-20        -12         -6        TDS   (32/48)     
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]][}   
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]][} 
__________________________
|Record|  Runtime: 4:19.99  {|||] 75%

Offline ero3030

  • Trade Count: (60)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1693
  • Gender: Male
Re: Noob Schoeps "amplifier" questions (CMC1U, etc)
« Reply #27 on: May 11, 2026, 06:12:18 AM »
PFA's r for back up IMO. To each there own. U r the only one who truly needs to like their own recordings
needin some fishhead music!
Ero3030 from the oade board
We r not bootleggers so stop bootlegging

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.053 seconds with 42 queries.
© 2002-2026 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF