0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: tfs8271 on February 04, 2006, 09:32:07 PMQuote from: aberg83 on February 04, 2006, 09:06:50 PMone of these days, I'm going to sell a kidney, my mp-2, and r-1, and pick up the V3/MT combo. I don't think there's much out there that can top that in the price range... this of course is just from the tapes I've heard, etc etc.Wait, you say you want to sell your kidney to buy a V3/MT combo. Lay off the booze and your kidney would be worth a portadrive.All this talk about V3 vs. ACM 671....I say location location location.I have recorded with my 660 vs V3, most of the time my friends V3 sounds slightly better but if I'm in the sweet spot he wants my recording. We usually matrix his stealth km54s>V3>D8 audience with my SBD>ACM 660 and it's all good.
Quote from: aberg83 on February 04, 2006, 09:06:50 PMone of these days, I'm going to sell a kidney, my mp-2, and r-1, and pick up the V3/MT combo. I don't think there's much out there that can top that in the price range... this of course is just from the tapes I've heard, etc etc.
Quote from: thegreatgumbino on February 05, 2006, 09:43:47 AMQuote from: Rick on February 05, 2006, 09:22:51 AMQuote from: aberg83 on February 04, 2006, 09:06:50 PMone of these days, I'm going to sell a kidney, my mp-2, and r-1, and pick up the V3/MT combo. I don't think there's much out there that can top that in the price rangeUsed V3 = $1000MT = $2994GB = $200Total = $1500That's if you get a used V3 too and you can get the MT for $299... Still $200 more then the ACM 671 and you can't do 24/96 (yet) and no auto track splitting ... not to mention you have to carry extra batteries for the V3 and MT... I'm not sold on the MT yet either. Otherwise I would have gone for the V3/MT combo. Actually it would be the same price, Rick. You need the CF card for either the MT or the 671, so you're looking at $1,500 for either option after purchasing the CF card. FWIW, the MT is doing 24/96 via S/PDIF now. Confirmation here. There are two problems with doing this though 1) most people are recording on 4GB CF cards, which doesn't allow for much recording time at 24/96, and 2) M-Audio hasn't fixed the 2GB recording limit, so you're still messing with tape flips.
Quote from: Rick on February 05, 2006, 09:22:51 AMQuote from: aberg83 on February 04, 2006, 09:06:50 PMone of these days, I'm going to sell a kidney, my mp-2, and r-1, and pick up the V3/MT combo. I don't think there's much out there that can top that in the price rangeUsed V3 = $1000MT = $2994GB = $200Total = $1500That's if you get a used V3 too and you can get the MT for $299... Still $200 more then the ACM 671 and you can't do 24/96 (yet) and no auto track splitting ... not to mention you have to carry extra batteries for the V3 and MT... I'm not sold on the MT yet either. Otherwise I would have gone for the V3/MT combo.
Quote from: aberg83 on February 04, 2006, 09:06:50 PMone of these days, I'm going to sell a kidney, my mp-2, and r-1, and pick up the V3/MT combo. I don't think there's much out there that can top that in the price range
Quote from: Freelunch on February 05, 2006, 10:23:27 AMFWIW, Ed just had a major V3 > MT failure for his Moe show in chicago.
Quote from: aberg83 on February 06, 2006, 04:06:39 PMWow, so I guess in that sense the acm671 is the better choice due to its reliability.
Quote from: DSatz on October 08, 2008, 09:45:01 PM(P.S.: On a threaded discussion board like this one, there's no need to repeat someone's post when you reply to them; everyone can see all the messages in the thread.)
Quote from: Nick's Picks on February 06, 2006, 05:09:55 PMDoug has mentioned some failures w/kingston. recomends sandisc and the other main brand I cant recall