Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: the deck i've *always wanted*  (Read 9614 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10271
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
the deck i've *always wanted*
« on: August 16, 2007, 04:08:30 PM »
is finally reality..and inexpensive.
http://www.cambridgeaudio.com/summary.php?PID=272&Title=Azur+740C+

i'm on this...like a cheap ass suit.

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10271
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: the deck i've *always wanted*
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2007, 05:18:24 PM »
exactly.
it makes it a DAC as well.
now, does it take 24bit ? not sure.  I guess that could be the ball buster.
but..., me no care.  I dont do much 24bit anything any ways.


janka

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: the deck i've *always wanted*
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2007, 05:30:41 PM »
The specs say it'll accept a 24 bit signal for DAC.

So what's your plan Nick DSD master > 16bit CD > 24bit upsampling playback?

Offline som

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 852
  • Gender: Male
Re: the deck i've *always wanted*
« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2007, 05:35:01 PM »
Is this the model that Sterophile reviews this month? I was impressed with the writeup, but then at the end they compared it to the Rega Apollo (a player I've been toying with, and when I say "toying with" I mean "keeping in the back of my mind for when I am either divorced or win the lottery and thus have $1000 to spend on a CD player"), and the description of the Rega as a bit warmer made me swing back that way again.

What is it about this deck that appeals to you?

Edit - I see from the previous posts what appeals to you!
AT ES943/C's > Church Audio ST-9100 > iRiver H100 (Rockboxed)

janka

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: the deck i've *always wanted*
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2007, 05:42:03 PM »
is finally reality..and inexpensive.
http://www.cambridgeaudio.com/summary.php?PID=272&Title=Azur+740C+

i'm on this...like a cheap ass suit.


You hanging out in your basement today? Northamptonaudio has this in stock for $999. Not what I'd call an inexpensive cd-player or DAC even as a combo.

http://northamptonaudio.com/Cambridge_Audio/cambridge_audio_740c.asp
« Last Edit: August 16, 2007, 05:43:57 PM by janka »

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10271
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: the deck i've *always wanted*
« Reply #5 on: August 16, 2007, 05:43:56 PM »
yes.., just finished.

what, a grand for a sweet digital source?  you've got to be kidding. thats cheap, IMO.
compare that to a decent transport and decent DAC.

ok, i'd probably start going DSD>24/96 w/this.

janka

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: the deck i've *always wanted*
« Reply #6 on: August 16, 2007, 05:50:00 PM »
yes.., just finished.

what, a grand for a sweet digital source?  you've got to be kidding. thats cheap, IMO.
compare that to a decent transport and decent DAC.

ok, i'd probably start going DSD>24/96 w/this.


so if you do DSD>24/96 the cd-player function isn't of much use. You then have a thousand dollar DAC that you still need a source for...just sayin'

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10271
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: the deck i've *always wanted*
« Reply #7 on: August 16, 2007, 05:53:10 PM »
huh?
you lost me.

in any case...
its my dream deck.  upsampling redbook, and 24bit DAC input.


janka

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: the deck i've *always wanted*
« Reply #8 on: August 16, 2007, 05:56:38 PM »
I just meant for the 24bit playback you still would need a source component. PC, squeezebox etc.

Offline jmz93

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 265
  • Gender: Male
Re: the deck i've *always wanted*
« Reply #9 on: August 16, 2007, 09:50:13 PM »
I'm missing something basic here... why would you want to up-sample a 16bit/44.1K cd source? What can actually be gained by doing this?  What does adding extra 0's and 1's to the data stream do to the resulting audio?

To me anyway, the process sounds roughly analogous to taking a low-res dot matrix printout - remember those? - and trying to guess accurately to make it look like the best color laser printing. Sounds like a guess ...

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10271
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: the deck i've *always wanted*
« Reply #10 on: August 17, 2007, 07:32:37 AM »
it just "works"...
there are benefits to how the signal is decoded at a higher bit / sample rate.  even if it was lower to start with...
the article in Stereophile goes into a little more detail.  I'm sure its posted online.
as for source ..., know I get it.
SB3 is in the plan for me

Offline Weirdness

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 198
  • Gender: Male
  • ...driftin' and dreamin'...
Re: the deck i've *always wanted*
« Reply #11 on: August 17, 2007, 09:15:22 AM »
I wonder what the difference betweeen the 740c and the 840c is?  I didn't realize that the 740c had digital inputs, thought that only the 840c would do this which I have been eyeing up for awhile.  Great idea in terms of features and apparently they are great sounding units.  Just answered my own question here, the 740c uses Wolfson DAC's and the 840c uses Analog Devices.  Anyways, let us know what you think if you take the plunge.   

Offline som

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 852
  • Gender: Male
Re: the deck i've *always wanted*
« Reply #12 on: August 17, 2007, 09:41:08 AM »
Supposedly the upsampling totally eliminates jitter.
AT ES943/C's > Church Audio ST-9100 > iRiver H100 (Rockboxed)

Offline carlbeck

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
  • Gender: Male
Re: the deck i've *always wanted*
« Reply #13 on: August 17, 2007, 01:01:10 PM »
Remembering back to the tests we did way back when I preferred the non up sampled source everytime. I think this is an OK deck but there are much better ways to spend 1k in stereo land. I would rather my old ECD convertor for one or one of the many transport & DAC combos currently available.


Typical Nick, gets all jacked up on techno garble specs & doesn't listen to it, what a tech geek!
I know you like, tape for people's approval and stuff, and wave your tapes around like they're your dick...  but even you can't actually think section tapes from philips sound good.  



Mics: Telefunken Elam 260, 61, 62, MBHO KA200, KA500 > Niant PFA's, AKG C34L-MS
Preamps: Grace Lunatec V2, Shure FP24
Decks: Tascam DR-2d, Zoom F8

Old rig: Recording: AKG C34 & AKG CK1X or CK2X > MK46 > 460 > Aeta Mix2000 > Sound Devices 702

Playback: Thorens TD125, Denon DVD-2900> Bel Canto DAC-1 > Audible Illusions 3B > Rogue Atlas >ZU Wax Shotgun> Hyperion 938
ALL TUBES BABY!!!

Offline Stagger

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 650
  • Gender: Male
  • Let's try again -ISO PSP2
Re: the deck i've *always wanted*
« Reply #14 on: August 17, 2007, 01:46:25 PM »
Indeed. Tweeter is a dealer for these and the 840C (the model above it) has never impressed me much. Then again, we have it in a rack with a Krell SACD Standard which isn't quite fair...
Current Setup: AKG c34 > S42 > Kimber Hero > 722

Nikon D7000, SB-700, Nikkor 18-200 f3.5-5.6, Nikkor 50 f1.8D, Sigma 10-20 f3.5, and way too many do-dads to list...

Playback: Denon DVD3910>Audio Experiences Symphonies Tube Pre [Electro-Harmonix/12AX7 Gold Pin ]>Rogue 88 Amplifier [Genalex Gold Lion KT88s, ultralinear]>Sonus Faber Grand Piano Home & Martin Logan Depth i - AudioQuest Jaguar and CV-8 DBS cable, Panamax M7500Pro conditioner.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.049 seconds with 44 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF