you would be MUCH better off resampling thru a wave editing program...
I'm curious to know why you think this? If done properly there should be NO difference between resampling through any audio application and resampling "on-the-fly" during burning. I find it a lot easier to leave the material at 48KHz, then let WaveBurner do it's converting when it burns it to CD. I've compared resampling prior and WB's resampling while burning and can't tell any difference between the two.
Wayne
well, for one, as mentioned above, it didnt sound like his nero was resampling "on the fly" right .if a lot of audible noise and pitch were heard, id say it soundz like it didnt do a too fine of a job resampling :)and i havent tried yer wave burner(soundz nice), maybe it does a better job resampling, i dunno, i might have to give it a try......
i basically just like the comfort of knowing if i use samplitude 6.0 or whatever, i have in my hands professional recording equpment that can do it not on the fly, but i have a better gut feeling using