Here are some pics of the internals of the M222 vs the CMC6xt.
wow... it appears there are basically no common intenrals
Quote from: ShawnSmith on April 21, 2007, 10:22:01 PM
wow... it appears there are basically no common intenrals
Surprized?
One is tube and the other is FET
They are very different animals
Cool. thanks for the peek.
look how much less "stuff" the electronic signal has to go through in the M222's
/tubes rule
Quote from: Brian Sax on April 22, 2007, 10:25:25 AMlook how much less "stuff" the electronic signal has to go through in the M222's
Keep in mind there's all the "stuff" inside the NT222, as well.
(http://www.posthorn.com/Images/Schoeps/S_m222_acc.jpg)
let's crack open one of those boxes and see how much "stuff" there is :D
Quote from: Brian Sax on April 22, 2007, 12:24:46 PM
let's crack open one of those boxes and see how much "stuff" there is :D
i'm willing to bet there is more "stuff" in there than is in the cmc body.
is it better "stuff" though ?
/clearly backtracking after early morning brain fart of forgetting n222 :P
/tubes still rule though
Why are the numbers blotted out?
Quote from: Roving Sign on April 22, 2007, 12:55:28 PM
Why are the numbers blotted out?
I didn't want to share my serial numbers with the world.
One thing I am suprised about with the M222 is how little the electronics are between the 701 Tube and the capsules.
Quote from: -Bob- on April 21, 2007, 10:42:00 PM
Quote from: ShawnSmith on April 21, 2007, 10:22:01 PM
wow... it appears there are basically no common intenrals
Surprized?
One is tube and the other is FET
They are very different animals
certainly, but I expected to at least something similair considering they power the same caps. I am in no way an electronics expert (though I techincally minored in physics-electronics in college), but I figured the layouts would at least be similair. It appears as though they basically have no common components.
is the tube the device labeled 701? or is it on the other side of the board?
thanks richard
anyone know how schoeps balance the impedance from the tupe without a transformer? ???
As others mentioned, I'm sure the 60v circuit and other stuff is in da box..
Here's a cmc6. Much less integration than the xt.
Quote from: muj on April 24, 2007, 04:53:34 AM
anyone know how schoeps balance the impedance from the tupe without a transformer? ???
RLC circuit? just a guess...