Schoeps M222 vs CMC6xt Internal PICs

[H₂O]

Here are some pics of the internals of the M222 vs the CMC6xt.

[Shawn]

wow... it appears there are basically no common intenrals

[BobW]

wow... it appears there are basically no common intenrals

Surprized?
One is tube and the other is FET
They are very different animals

[rowjimmy]

Cool. thanks for the peek.

[Brian]

look how much less "stuff" the electronic signal has to go through in the M222's

/tubes rule

[Brian Skalinder]

look how much less "stuff" the electronic signal has to go through in the M222's

Keep in mind there's all the "stuff" inside the NT222, as well.

[Brian]

let's crack open one of those boxes and see how much "stuff" there is

[rokpunk]

let's crack open one of those boxes and see how much "stuff" there is

i'm willing to bet there is more "stuff" in there than is in the cmc body.

[Brian]

is it better "stuff" though ?

/clearly backtracking after early morning brain fart of forgetting n222

/tubes still rule though

[Roving Sign]

Why are the numbers blotted out?

[H₂O]

Why are the numbers blotted out?

I didn't want to share my serial numbers with the world.

[H₂O]

One thing I am suprised about with the M222 is how little the electronics are between the 701 Tube and the capsules.

[Shawn]

wow... it appears there are basically no common intenrals

Surprized?
One is tube and the other is FET
They are very different animals

certainly, but I expected to at least something similair considering they power the same caps. I am in no way an electronics expert (though I techincally minored in physics-electronics in college), but I figured the layouts would at least be similair. It appears as though they basically have no common components.

[BWolf]

is the tube the device labeled 701?  or is it on the other side of the board?

[Tim]

thanks richard