Any opinions about the M-Audio Transit USB?
The M-Audio Transit is what Grace Design suggested to me to use as the digi-out from my computer to their headphone amp, FWIW.
They made the same suggestion to me. The reason they suggested that is that their USB DOES NOT SUPPORT 96/24 (according to their own tech support)!!! Again: you cannot stream 96/24 through the Grace Design USB!!!Even though the USB 1.1 protocol does not state a limit on the sampling rate and 24/192 requires only 9.216Mbps, most of the host USB controllers that fall under the 2.0 realm are better suited for audio.
John Atkinson writes in the January, 2008 issue of stereophile about the Benchmark DAC1 "Benchmark chose to use a USB 1.1 port rather than the more modern and much faster USB 2.0 (which is backward-compatible with USB 1.1), because then the D/A could be used without the host computer having to run a custom driver program, and Benchmark could thus control communication to allow the transmission of bit-transparent high-resolution data. (The code to do this was developed for Benchmark by Centrance, Inc..) USB 1.1 has a maximum transmission rate of 12Mbps, which is sufficient for two channels of 24/96 data."
So I'm not sure why the Grace Design USB does not support 96/24. It's interesting that Sam Tellig does not bring up this point in his comparison of the 2 DAC's in the October 2008 issue. He is not as tech savvy as John Atkinson and his prose (and jokes) can be embarassing, but he has good ears and "discovered" the Triangle speakers for me (until John Atkinson started analyzing how they measure...)
Noam