Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Edirol R-09HR - Part FOUR  (Read 93128 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline su6oxone

  • Trade Count: (38)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2761
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part FOUR
« Reply #90 on: June 12, 2009, 12:51:49 AM »
So I finally did a battery test using 2700mAh Sanyos and recording at 24bit/96khz with the LCD on continuously at a brightness of 1...

7 hours and 2 minutes!

Not too shabby.  I'll test later on with 24bit/44.1khz (which is what I always record at). 


Offline George2

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part FOUR
« Reply #91 on: June 12, 2009, 10:40:13 AM »
What software version are you using? I'm still on 1.04 and mine chokes on 96/24 after the first 2GB file. Transcend 8GB class 6 card.
I think I went 10 hours on Duracell 2650mAh batteries at 44/16. I like this recorder.
Sennheiser 418s>SDMixPre-D>RO9HR
Beyer MC930>Fostex FM3>NagraSD
Couple of Schoeps CMT441 too.

Offline su6oxone

  • Trade Count: (38)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2761
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part FOUR
« Reply #92 on: June 12, 2009, 11:34:32 AM »
What software version are you using? I'm still on 1.04 and mine chokes on 96/24 after the first 2GB file. Transcend 8GB class 6 card.
I think I went 10 hours on Duracell 2650mAh batteries at 44/16. I like this recorder.

1.06 and also using a Transcend class 6 card (16gb). 

Offline George2

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part FOUR
« Reply #93 on: June 12, 2009, 02:25:42 PM »
I just version up'd to 1.06 and testing at 96/24... doesn't appear to be choking....so far records a couple 2GB files and continues.
Sennheiser 418s>SDMixPre-D>RO9HR
Beyer MC930>Fostex FM3>NagraSD
Couple of Schoeps CMT441 too.

Offline guysonic

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1366
  • WISDOM FOR ALL TIMES
    • Sonic Studios DSM Stereo-Surround Microphone Systems
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part FOUR
« Reply #94 on: June 13, 2009, 08:35:18 AM »
It'd be interesting to do a bench test comp:

source output > good pre amp > r09 peaking at -12
source output > good pre amp > r09 peaking at -1

You could do this two ways - levels adjusted at the pre-amp, and levels adjusted at the r09 only (though I find comps with more than two files do not get as much participation, etc)

Then tweak the gain so they both peak at 0, and let folks vote on which sounds better.


Athough a comp would be interesting to do, technically speaking it's NOT a good idea to drive VU peaks near maximum on battery powered decks.

-1 dBvu is typically very near the supply rails of the device where non-linear distortion has best chance of occurring producing a lower quality recording. 

If recording at 24 bit depth, no reason for driving VU anywhere near maximum and peaks near -12 dBvu seems a wiser tact for having less chance of distortion with adequate headroom for live events.
"mics? I no got no mics!  Besides, I no have to show you no stink'n mics!" stxxlth taper's disclaimer

DSM HRTF STEREO-SURROUND RECORDING SYSTEMS WEBSITE: http://www.sonicstudios.com

Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part FOUR
« Reply #95 on: June 15, 2009, 10:06:52 AM »
It'd be interesting to do a bench test comp:

source output > good pre amp > r09 peaking at -12
source output > good pre amp > r09 peaking at -1

You could do this two ways - levels adjusted at the pre-amp, and levels adjusted at the r09 only (though I find comps with more than two files do not get as much participation, etc)

Then tweak the gain so they both peak at 0, and let folks vote on which sounds better.


Athough a comp would be interesting to do, technically speaking it's NOT a good idea to drive VU peaks near maximum on battery powered decks.

-1 dBvu is typically very near the supply rails of the device where non-linear distortion has best chance of occurring producing a lower quality recording. 

If recording at 24 bit depth, no reason for driving VU anywhere near maximum and peaks near -12 dBvu seems a wiser tact for having less chance of distortion with adequate headroom for live events.


Everything Guysonic said  ;)
Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline colargol

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 176
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part FOUR
« Reply #96 on: June 23, 2009, 02:35:17 AM »
there are definitely problems with at least a couple of gear combinations, and possibly more, when using the r09hr as a capture device.

1) mics > eaa psp2 > r09hr
2) schoeps mk(x) > remote cables > nbox > r09hr

freelunch and i both own an eaa psp2, which at it's lowest setting outputs ~22db of gain.

the other preamp i, and others use with our schoeps mk(x) capsules, is called an nbox.  it is a boutique, custom built unit which provides power to the schoeps mk(x) capsues, as well as provides a fixed gain of ~18db.  it interfaces with the capsules via proprietary remote cables which can only be used with the nbox, so swapping the power source / preamp out of the chain is not an option.

i for one, am not going to get rid of either preamp because they operate and sound great, and their design is not flawed, like you suggest.  if the r09hr proves to be a deck that cannot handle their output, i'll simply buy a deck that will.

Did anyone find out whether any of the available small decks can handle this output?

-Colargol
MK4s/MK41s > nbob actives > tinybox/babynbox > M10/A10

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15772
  • Gender: Male
  • We create auditory illusions, not reproductions
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part FOUR
« Reply #97 on: June 23, 2009, 10:04:23 AM »
Using an attenuator between the fixed gain preamp and the recorder to pad the level down to what the recorder can handle should eliminate those distortion problems.  That will effectively 'turn down' the fixed gain of the preamp by the value of the attenuator.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline livejamz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 160
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part FOUR
« Reply #98 on: June 25, 2009, 07:41:45 AM »
I just received my Edirol in the mail the other day. I am going to be recording some stuff next week.  I need some help.

There are allot of setting on this where should they all be?

Ive been looking at Core's website for mics for stealth any suggestions?

Anything else I need to know about?

Thank for your help.

Mark

Offline 69mako

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 645
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part FOUR
« Reply #99 on: June 25, 2009, 10:18:04 AM »
I just received my Edirol in the mail the other day. I am going to be recording some stuff next week.  I need some help.

There are allot of setting on this where should they all be?

Ive been looking at Core's website for mics for stealth any suggestions?

Anything else I need to know about?

Thank for your help.

Mark

Congrats on the purchase, you will like it a lot.  As for settings...

1. Record in 24 bit.
2. 45ish for the recording level
3. Everything low/off on the back.

As for mics, I'd seriously consider picking up a set of CA-14 and 9100 preamp.

Mako
http://db.etree.org/69mako

007: Church Audio CA-14c -> Church Audio St-9100 preamp -> R-09HR

Open: Busman BSC1 mics (X2) -> Hydra Cables (X2) -> Tmod R4

Offline a-dub

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 54
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part FOUR
« Reply #100 on: June 26, 2009, 12:10:39 AM »
I would also recommend the SP-TFB-2 http://www.soundprofessionals.com/cgi-bin/gold/item/SP-TFB-2

They are great binaural mics, stealthy, and compliment the R-09HR very well!
Shhh, silence is golden.

Offline Falconidave

  • Trade Count: (35)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 401
  • Gender: Male
  • "I went to too many concerts" said no one ever!
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part FOUR
« Reply #101 on: June 27, 2009, 02:07:57 AM »
Running firmware version 1.06 without problems for a month now.  Great deck but I'm liking my D50 better when going mic in is called for...
Mics: Schoeps MK41; AT853(3-wire)(c,o); AT943(3-wire)(c,o); AT933(3-wire)(c,o); Shure 185(c); Sony ECM-166BMP (o); Sony ECM-166BC (c).
Interconnects: NBob Actives
Preamps: BabyNbox v2
Recorders: Sony PCM-A10(2); Sony PCM-M10; Edirol R-09HR; Sony MZ-RH1
Video: Panasonic HDC-TM700 HD; Panasonic Lumix GX85; Panasonic Lumix DMC ZS100; Canon PowerShot SX50 HD; Sony DSC-HX50V

Offline swordfish

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 384
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part FOUR
« Reply #102 on: July 03, 2009, 01:30:55 PM »
Newbie's question where do you find the 1.06 Firmware?


Offline George2

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Sennheiser 418s>SDMixPre-D>RO9HR
Beyer MC930>Fostex FM3>NagraSD
Couple of Schoeps CMT441 too.

Offline swordfish

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 384
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part FOUR
« Reply #104 on: July 03, 2009, 03:16:55 PM »
thanks a lot

SF

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.075 seconds with 43 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF