Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: audix 1280/1290. Cards or Hypers?  (Read 3634 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nicegrin

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 192
audix 1280/1290. Cards or Hypers?
« on: September 01, 2009, 06:53:57 PM »
I´m abit curious about the audix 1280/1290 mic.
Which capsules would you say is your favourite, the cards or the hypers?
Anyone who tried both and have a preference?

Thanks!

/N
Toy Box:

MICS:

Omnis:  6xNevaton MCE400s, Countryman b3s (modded), MM HLSOs (4.7K mod), Aevox in ear MK2s, CA-11s
Cards:   Schoeps MK4s with Schoeps CMRS, Milab VM-44 Links, SP CMC-8,  AT853, Sennheiser MKE 104, MM HLSC-1s, ECM-717
Hypers: AKG CK93s (modded), SP CMC-8, AT853, Audix 1280s (Church actives).


INBETWEEN: Naiant Tinybox (CMR mod), Naiant Tinybox (p48 mod), Naiant PFA, CA-9100, CA Ugly, Denecke PS-2 mini, MM-MBM, MM-CBM, SP SPSB-8, custom nuetrik XLR to TRS cables, 5 pin to 5 pin extension cable. 

DECKS: A10, M10, R05, Tascam DR-05, R09-HR , MT2, Sharp MS-H702, MZ-R 70.

Offline M

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 265
Re: audix 1280/1290. Cards or Hypers?
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2009, 12:57:50 PM »
Don't have the hypers and I have no intentions of getting any. 
Beyer CK930>Naiant TB>M10

Offline su6oxone

  • Trade Count: (38)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2761
Re: audix 1280/1290. Cards or Hypers?
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2009, 01:02:18 PM »
I´m abit curious about the audix 1280/1290 mic.
Which capsules would you say is your favourite, the cards or the hypers?
Anyone who tried both and have a preference?

Thanks!

/N

I don't have any experiences with these Audix mics, but I would recommend listening to sources on archive.org to see which ones sound better to you.  There are quite a few with cardioid caps and I believe at least a few with hypers.  One phish souce recently on etree used hypers and sounded rather good.

Offline Walstib62

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3276
  • Gender: Male
Re: audix 1280/1290. Cards or Hypers?
« Reply #3 on: September 02, 2009, 02:05:36 PM »
I have the 1290 cards. I think they sound great. MTerry has the hypers, and he loves his. The only real difference is the polar pattern, obviously. I think the cards are better for general purpose stuff. Hypers are more directional, and can aid in reducing off axis noise.

Offline Will_S

  • Trade Count: (15)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2217
Re: audix 1280/1290. Cards or Hypers?
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2009, 06:33:24 PM »
The cards can sound a bit more natural, and have better bass response, but I probably end up using the hypers more often.  They always sound good to me.  The cards can sound great, or bleh if the acoustics aren't up to snuff.  I've never gotten home from a show regretting using hypers, but I have come home wishing I had.

I think hypers tend to get a bit of a bad rap because so many people see them as a mic of last resort, that they'll only use if forced into a subpar spot.  Try running them from the sweet spot some time, you might be pleasantly surprised.

Offline mterry

  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3279
  • Gender: Male
    • recordings
Re: audix 1280/1290. Cards or Hypers?
« Reply #5 on: September 02, 2009, 07:03:41 PM »
The cards can sound a bit more natural, and have better bass response, but I probably end up using the hypers more often.  They always sound good to me.  The cards can sound great, or bleh if the acoustics aren't up to snuff.  I've never gotten home from a show regretting using hypers, but I have come home wishing I had.

I think hypers tend to get a bit of a bad rap because so many people see them as a mic of last resort, that they'll only use if forced into a subpar spot.  Try running them from the sweet spot some time, you might be pleasantly surprised.

Yep. I have enjoyed using my hyper's more than my old 480/ck61 set up. I've run the audix all summer in the Phish section, then at  800 capacity clubs or my local music club and never thought twice about doing so. I want to snag some card caps, but mainly for on-stage.
"That's deplorable, unfathomable, improbable!"

"Then we played Davidson, and they wore us out. Davidson controlled us - other than Kentucky - as well as any team all year long"
- Bill Self on PTI (2/28/11)

DPA 2012 > Lunatec V2 > Apogee Mini-Me > Tascam DR-100mkIII

https://archive.org/details/@terrytapez

Offline Javier Cinakowski

  • !! Downhill From Here !!
  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4325
  • Gender: Male
Re: audix 1280/1290. Cards or Hypers?
« Reply #6 on: September 02, 2009, 07:27:55 PM »
I taped the starlake phish show a rig or two down from mterry's audix hyper rig.  I was running hypers of a different brand so I was quite interested to hear his pull.  I was very impressed, those hypers sound amazing for such a small and directional microphone.    They are smaller and more low pro than my Rode NT6 "actives".  His recording and the discovery of Chris Church's new audix 1/8" cable made me really think hard about selling my rig.



Neumann KM185mp OR DPA ST2015-> Grace Design Lunatec V2-> Tascam DR-100mkIII

Offline Walstib62

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3276
  • Gender: Male
Re: audix 1280/1290. Cards or Hypers?
« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2009, 06:59:06 PM »
Mark,

For onstage, you might wanna look at the omnis...

Too bad they don't make sub cards.

I gotta get the Church cables!!

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.045 seconds with 31 queries.
© 2002-2025 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF