Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Differences in the various 2 track recorders?  (Read 5271 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jnorman34

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Differences in the various 2 track recorders?
« on: November 03, 2009, 04:08:17 PM »
Can someon please outline the principal differences in the various marantz recorders - the pmd660, 661, 620, 671, etc - and how they compare to other units such as the fostex FR-LE2 and others?   

i need a good 2 track machine for chamber music, that has preamps good enough that all i need to carry is a pair of good mics and the recorder.  a used PMD 660 just sold on ebay for $265 - is that thing good enough, or are there benefits to newer models, more expensive models?  what is best bang for buck?  thanks.

Offline fmaderjr

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: Differences in the various 2 track recorders?
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2009, 02:42:18 AM »
i need a good 2 track machine for chamber music, that has preamps good enough that all i need to carry is a pair of good mics and the recorder.  a used PMD 660 just sold on ebay for $265 - is that thing good enough?

No, the 660 needs the Oade/Busman mod or too much danger of overloading. A modded 661 would certainly be a good choice, but an owner of an unmodded one could let you know how that would work. A stock 661 supposedly has much better preamps than a 660, but most TSers who run one seem to have it modded (perhaps just because of all the problems people had with unmodded 660's).

The 671 (or Fostex FR2-LE) is supposedly better unmodded, but most people here run them modded as well, so not sure of the risks running one umodded.

A stock 620 is fine if your mics don't need phantom power, but I imagine they do.
AT853's (all caps)/CM-300 Franken Naks (CP-1,2,3)/JBMod Nak 700's (CP-701,702) > Tascam DR-680
Or Sonic Studios DSM-6 > M10

Offline oudplayer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
    • musiq.com
Re: Differences in the various 2 track recorders?
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2009, 04:07:36 PM »
i need a good 2 track machine for chamber music, that has preamps good enough that all i need to carry is a pair of good mics and the recorder.  a used PMD 660 just sold on ebay for $265 - is that thing good enough, or are there benefits to newer models, more expensive models?  what is best bang for buck?  thanks.
We have a stock PMD 660 here - it has neither quiet nor neutral-sounding preamps and I would never use it for chamber music if I had other options available. It also provides insufficient phantom voltage for some models of mics. I also find the interface to be maddening.

Offline DigiGal

  • AES Associate Member
  • Trade Count: (30)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
  • Gender: Female
  • Stay healthy and safe!
    • DigiGal Internet Archive Recordings
Re: Differences in the various 2 track recorders?
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2009, 12:48:48 AM »
My stock PMD661 just did a fine job recording a chamber orchestra Oct 30th.
Mics: AKG CK91/CK94/CK98/SE300 D-330BT | DPA 4060 4061 4266 | Neumann TLM 103 | Senn ME66/K6/K6RD MKE2 MD421 MD431 | Shure VP88 SM7B SM63L SM58 Anniversary Cables: Gotham GAC-4/1 Quad w/Neutrik EMC | Gotham GAC-2pair w/AKG MK90/3 connectors | DigiGal AES>S/PDIF cable Preamp: SD MixPre-D Recorders: SD MixPre 6 | Marantz PMD 661 Edit: 2011 27" 3.4GHz Quad i7 iMac High Sierra | 2020 13" MBA Quad i7 Catalina | Wave Editor | xACT | Transmission | FCP X 

Offline datbrad

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2342
  • Gender: Male
Re: Differences in the various 2 track recorders?
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2009, 09:12:43 AM »
My stock PMD661 just did a fine job recording a chamber orchestra Oct 30th.

You should post a torrent so we can hear what a stock unit sounds like. I can honestly say I have never heard a single recording made with a stock 661, and would really like to hear what it sounds like.

I am curious if my well saturated ears can actually hear the difference between the 65db SNR at the mic in of the stock unit, compared with the 120db SNR chips used in the Oade modded unit.

AKG C460B w/CK61/CK63>Luminous Monarch XLRs>SD MP-1(x2)>Luminous Monarch XLRs>PMD661(Oade WMOD)

Beyer M201>Luminous Monarch XLRs>PMD561 (Oade CMOD)

Offline flintstone

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 767
Re: Differences in the various 2 track recorders?
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2009, 06:40:40 PM »
Will you be taping in the open, and able to position the mics close for optimum results?  Will you have access to mains power, or will you run on batteries?  Do you care how large the recorder and mic setup will be?  Have you chosen the mics already?

What's the goal for the recording:  indie publication, sound check for the musicians, personal interest?  This will help us understand what you mean by a "good recording."

Flintstone

jnorman34

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Differences in the various 2 track recorders?
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2009, 12:59:03 PM »
hi flint - mics are km184s or at4051s.  am now considering the DR-100 unit.  yes, i get to control where mics are placed - this is for private remote venue recording purposes, from small halls, to living rooms - no concert halls or audiences.  currently using 184s>lexicon u42s>thinkpad t61 running reaper, and looking for more portable solution while keeping quality.  no experience with what the preamps in units like the DR-100 sound like, but pres are my greatest concern, and i prefer flattish, warmish sound, so perhaps there is a warm-mod unit of some type that wold suit me.  thanks.

Offline su6oxone

  • Trade Count: (38)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2761
Re: Differences in the various 2 track recorders?
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2009, 03:24:50 PM »
A modded 661 would certainly be a good choice, but an owner of an unmodded one could let you know how that would work.

I have an unmodded 661 and I've run it a few times so far (Cranberries and Los Lobos) but I love it so far.  Great results and low noise, stock preamp sounds good to me.  I'll be running it tonight for a LMA show so you can check that one out tomorrow also.  My Cranberries pull is on Dime and the Los Lobos show is on etree. 

Offline aaronji

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 4220
Re: Differences in the various 2 track recorders?
« Reply #8 on: November 16, 2009, 03:26:14 PM »
hi flint - mics are km184s or at4051s.  am now considering the DR-100 unit.  yes, i get to control where mics are placed - this is for private remote venue recording purposes, from small halls, to living rooms - no concert halls or audiences.  currently using 184s>lexicon u42s>thinkpad t61 running reaper, and looking for more portable solution while keeping quality.  no experience with what the preamps in units like the DR-100 sound like, but pres are my greatest concern, and i prefer flattish, warmish sound, so perhaps there is a warm-mod unit of some type that wold suit me.  thanks.

Oade has a warm mod PMD661 that might fit the bill (http://www.oade.com/digital_recorders/hard_disc_recorders/PMD-661MODS.html)...Only a little bigger than the DR-100 (about 1/2" longer and wider) and runs about four and a half hours with phantom.  I think DATBRAD has this flavor and likes it...

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.049 seconds with 33 queries.
© 2002-2025 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF