Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: AT U853 Powered by CA-9100 Correctly?  (Read 3759 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cheesecadet

  • Trade Count: (21)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3017
  • Gender: Male
  • http://db.etree.org/cheesecadet
AT U853 Powered by CA-9100 Correctly?
« on: May 23, 2010, 05:22:00 PM »
Just curious if a Church Audio CA-9100 v4.4 will correctly power a set of the Audio Technica U853s that are terminated to a 1/8" mini connector?

Do the mics need the low sensitivity mod if I am mostly seeing rock shows...with the occasional acoustic show?

I would be running the mics into a sony PCM-M10 or an iRiver iHP-120.

Another question I have is, would a battery box be enough to power the U853s also to get enough gain to run line in if the mics had the low sensitivity mod.

Thanks for any advice.  :D
AKG 481's, DPA 4061's (Matched), AT ES933's w/ AT853-ELE's (SC/C/O), ECM-19B's, MixPre-3, A10, M10 x 2, Hi Ho Silvers, Various Darktrain & GAKables

Vinyl:
Fluance RT83 Reference > MCS 3230 Receiver > Realistic MC-500's (NOS)

Upcoming:
05/04 Harry Mack (?)
05/10 Adam Bodine Quartet
06/07 Bill Frisell Trio
06/08 Common
06/19 Sensational Barnes Brothers
06/20 Adam Bodine Quintet
07/19 Chali 2na & Cut Chemist
07/30 Tomorrows Bad Seeds

Offline fmaderjr

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: AT U853 Powered by CA-9100 Correctly?
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2010, 05:54:58 PM »
Just curious if a Church Audio CA-9100 v4.4 will correctly power a set of the Audio Technica U853s that are terminated to a 1/8" mini connector?

Do the mics need the low sensitivity mod if I am mostly seeing rock shows...with the occasional acoustic show?

I would be running the mics into a sony PCM-M10 or an iRiver iHP-120.

Another question I have is, would a battery box be enough to power the U853s also to get enough gain to run line in if the mics had the low sensitivity mod.

Thanks for any advice.  :D

Yes to the first 2. A ST-9100 will power the mics fine, but the mics may still distort when the show is very loud without the mod.

You may be able to get away with just a battery box with the Sony. You don't want to turn the iRiver's gain above 24 db (some even say 15) so you definitely would need a the ST-9100 with the iRiver for acoustic and probably for rock that is not fairly loud.

I would still recommend using the ST-9100 instead of a battery box in most cases. It isn't very big and isn't very expensive. I can easily fit an M10 and ST-9100 into a large shirt front pocket.
AT853's (all caps)/CM-300 Franken Naks (CP-1,2,3)/JBMod Nak 700's (CP-701,702) > Tascam DR-680
Or Sonic Studios DSM-6 > M10

Offline hawghunter

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 384
  • Gender: Male
  • Planet of Sound
Re: AT U853 Powered by CA-9100 Correctly?
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2010, 10:22:32 PM »
i thought i read some of the newer pre amps had the mod on them, not sure though.
i ran the same thing but mic's had the mod. give it a test run, ehh?
ISO: NIRVANA :), 8/15/91 - The Roxy

930's > MMe

Offline Cheesecadet

  • Trade Count: (21)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3017
  • Gender: Male
  • http://db.etree.org/cheesecadet
Re: AT U853 Powered by CA-9100 Correctly?
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2010, 10:44:57 PM »
i thought i read some of the newer pre amps had the mod on them, not sure though.
i ran the same thing but mic's had the mod. give it a test run, ehh?

Which mod would that be?...the 4.7k? 

I don't have the 853 mics yet o cannot test run.
AKG 481's, DPA 4061's (Matched), AT ES933's w/ AT853-ELE's (SC/C/O), ECM-19B's, MixPre-3, A10, M10 x 2, Hi Ho Silvers, Various Darktrain & GAKables

Vinyl:
Fluance RT83 Reference > MCS 3230 Receiver > Realistic MC-500's (NOS)

Upcoming:
05/04 Harry Mack (?)
05/10 Adam Bodine Quartet
06/07 Bill Frisell Trio
06/08 Common
06/19 Sensational Barnes Brothers
06/20 Adam Bodine Quintet
07/19 Chali 2na & Cut Chemist
07/30 Tomorrows Bad Seeds

Offline fmaderjr

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: AT U853 Powered by CA-9100 Correctly?
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2010, 07:13:59 AM »
i thought i read some of the newer pre amps had the mod on them, not sure though.
i ran the same thing but mic's had the mod. give it a test run, ehh?

You can get the mod built into a ST-9100 so it can be switched on and off. I believe the mics need to be terminated with Mini-XLR's for this option. I know that was the case 2 years ago when I got mine.
AT853's (all caps)/CM-300 Franken Naks (CP-1,2,3)/JBMod Nak 700's (CP-701,702) > Tascam DR-680
Or Sonic Studios DSM-6 > M10

Offline Belexes

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
  • Gender: Male
Re: AT U853 Powered by CA-9100 Correctly?
« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2010, 08:34:05 AM »
You'll need the 4.7 mod. I needed that for my mics. Do it either with the 9100 or the mics themselves.

I can send you a sample of my Experience Hendrix show without the mod. DISTORTED.  :-\
Busman Audio BSC1-K1/K2/K3/K4 > HiHo Silver XLR's > Deck TBD

CA-14 (c,o)/MM-HLSC-1 (4.7k mod)/AT853(4.7k mod)(c,o,h,sc)/CAFS (o)/CA-1 (o) > CA-9100 (V. 4.1)/CA-9200/CA-UBB > Sony PCM-D50/Sony PCM-M10

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: AT U853 Powered by CA-9100 Correctly?
« Reply #6 on: May 24, 2010, 10:47:52 AM »
Just curious if a Church Audio CA-9100 v4.4 will correctly power a set of the Audio Technica U853s that are terminated to a 1/8" mini connector?

Do the mics need the low sensitivity mod if I am mostly seeing rock shows...with the occasional acoustic show?

I would be running the mics into a sony PCM-M10 or an iRiver iHP-120.

Another question I have is, would a battery box be enough to power the U853s also to get enough gain to run line in if the mics had the low sensitivity mod.

Thanks for any advice.  :D


Yes.. BUT.... the 853 mics will overload when wired 2 wire with out my mod.. So Yes my preamp will power the mics properly but you still might have overloading issues because these mics should have never been built to run on 2 wire because they overload so easily. They were never designed to be run two wire only three wire for high SPL applications, atleast until I came up with the 4.7k mod. So you have three options

1- Run the mics three wire with a battery box.

2- Run the mics with a 3 wire 9100 preamp with the 4.7k mod this gives you the ability to run them 2 wire for low volume shows and with my 4.7k mod for loud shows.

3- Run them as they are into a 9100 with 3.5mm input or a battery box with a 3.5 mm input if you are not going to be using them for shows that will approach 109db. That sounds like a very loud show but its about average for a club show at close range.

There is one more option I can modify the mics so that they will stay with the 3.5 mm plug but I can build the 4.7k mod inside the mics.

Honestly you are the perfect candidate for my 4.7k 9100 preamp. Because you do acoustic shows and you do rock shows.. The 9100 with the 4.7k mod will allow you to do both well. With the 4.7k mod off you will have 30db of gain good for acoustic shows with the 4.7k mod on you will have 20db  of gain perfect for rock shows.


The price of the preamp is $149 with the 3 pin mini xlr connectors and the 4.7k mod installed the price of terminating your 853 mics is $29 this includes the two mini xlr connectors.

Chris
« Last Edit: May 24, 2010, 10:53:14 AM by Church-Audio »
for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

Offline dactylus

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (62)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5992
  • Gender: Male
  • Maplewood, MN
Re: AT U853 Powered by CA-9100 Correctly?
« Reply #7 on: May 31, 2010, 08:58:20 AM »
.
hot licks > microphones > recorder



...ball of confusion, that's what the world is today, hey hey...

Offline Cheesecadet

  • Trade Count: (21)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3017
  • Gender: Male
  • http://db.etree.org/cheesecadet
Re: AT U853 Powered by CA-9100 Correctly?
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2010, 02:49:28 PM »
Does an attenuator cable accomplish the same thing as the 4.7k mod???
AKG 481's, DPA 4061's (Matched), AT ES933's w/ AT853-ELE's (SC/C/O), ECM-19B's, MixPre-3, A10, M10 x 2, Hi Ho Silvers, Various Darktrain & GAKables

Vinyl:
Fluance RT83 Reference > MCS 3230 Receiver > Realistic MC-500's (NOS)

Upcoming:
05/04 Harry Mack (?)
05/10 Adam Bodine Quartet
06/07 Bill Frisell Trio
06/08 Common
06/19 Sensational Barnes Brothers
06/20 Adam Bodine Quintet
07/19 Chali 2na & Cut Chemist
07/30 Tomorrows Bad Seeds

Offline su6oxone

  • Trade Count: (38)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2761
Re: AT U853 Powered by CA-9100 Correctly?
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2010, 03:17:58 PM »
Does an attenuator cable accomplish the same thing as the 4.7k mod???

I don't think so, as the attenuator will decrease the signal leaving the mic capsule, which will already be distorted without the mod at a high SPL show.

Offline fmaderjr

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: AT U853 Powered by CA-9100 Correctly?
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2010, 04:08:10 PM »
Does an attenuator cable accomplish the same thing as the 4.7k mod???

I don't think so, as the attenuator will decrease the signal leaving the mic capsule, which will already be distorted without the mod at a high SPL show.

Absolutely correct. If it was as simple as using an attenuator to avoid distortion, the 4.7 k mod would not be nearly as popular. An attenuator can sometimes prevent a recorder from overloading, but has no effect if the mic capsules themselves can't handle the sound pressure level.
AT853's (all caps)/CM-300 Franken Naks (CP-1,2,3)/JBMod Nak 700's (CP-701,702) > Tascam DR-680
Or Sonic Studios DSM-6 > M10

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: AT U853 Powered by CA-9100 Correctly?
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2010, 08:11:46 PM »
Does an attenuator cable accomplish the same thing as the 4.7k mod???

I don't think so, as the attenuator will decrease the signal leaving the mic capsule, which will already be distorted without the mod at a high SPL show.

Absolutely correct. If it was as simple as using an attenuator to avoid distortion, the 4.7 k mod would not be nearly as popular. An attenuator can sometimes prevent a recorder from overloading, but has no effect if the mic capsules themselves can't handle the sound pressure level.

Correct. The attenuator will do nothing to solve the issue except add noise and reduce the bias voltage to the capsule :)
for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

Offline Hypnocracy

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (46)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 2011
  • Hypnocratic Missionary
    • Hypno on teh LMA
Re: AT U853 Powered by CA-9100 Correctly?
« Reply #12 on: September 16, 2010, 11:56:57 PM »
Three Wire Mini-XLR 9100 is the way to go...I got it for low pro with my AT853's...liked it enough to bring to open taping now...

Add a Lowes Stereo Bar (plumbing Street Connector and PVC Pipe), Shock Mount and a clamp...that is one sweet set up
_____________
hypno on teh Archive

This must be heaven -- 'cause here's where the rainbow ends
If this ain't the real thing, then it's close enough to pretend

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: AT U853 Powered by CA-9100 Correctly?
« Reply #13 on: September 17, 2010, 07:55:29 AM »
Three Wire Mini-XLR 9100 is the way to go...I got it for low pro with my AT853's...liked it enough to bring to open taping now...

Add a Lowes Stereo Bar (plumbing Street Connector and PVC Pipe), Shock Mount and a clamp...that is one sweet set up

Thank you I appreciate that.

Chris
for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.064 seconds with 37 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF