Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Poll

Which unit do you like better

PCM-M10
46 (80.7%)
R-09HR
11 (19.3%)

Total Members Voted: 55

Author Topic: Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10  (Read 22519 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cgresq192

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 117
Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10
« on: December 27, 2010, 11:21:00 AM »
Now that the PCM-M10 has been out for a while I'm curious how many went from a Edirol R-09HR to a Sony PCM-10

I tape mostly stealth and also wondering how people with experience using both have been working out.

Thanks for any info
« Last Edit: December 27, 2010, 11:49:22 AM by cgresq192 »
DPA 4061's > CA-9100>(3wire)>R-09HR
SPCMC4(AT853's)>CA-9100(3wire)>R-09HR

Offline colargol

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 184
Re: Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2010, 10:03:54 AM »
I did, and I am very satisfied...
The most important factor for me, doing stealth, is that I can easily adjust gain manually, and without fiddling with the hold button. Of course, a lot of people with disagree that this is better, but for me, it is.
The overall feel of the M10 is a lot better, IMO, and of course, the battery time is awesome.

-c
MK4s/MK41s > nbob actives > tinybox/babynbox/riotbox > M10/A10/PR-2

Offline Belexes

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
  • Gender: Male
Re: Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2010, 02:34:22 PM »
I did and would not switch back to the R-09HR. The M10 has great battery life and I like that you can fiddle with the gain without introducing any noise to the recording.
Busman Audio BSC1-K1/K2/K3/K4 > HiHo Silver XLR's > Deck TBD

CA-14 (c,o)/MM-HLSC-1 (4.7k mod)/AT853(4.7k mod)(c,o,h,sc)/CAFS (o)/CA-1 (o) > CA-9100 (V. 4.1)/CA-9200/CA-UBB > Sony PCM-D50/Sony PCM-M10

Offline fmaderjr

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2010, 03:08:54 PM »
The most important factor for me, doing stealth, is that I can easily adjust gain manually, and without fiddling with the hold button. Of course, a lot of people with disagree that this is better, but for me, it is.
The overall feel of the M10 is a lot better, IMO, and of course, the battery time is awesome.

Yes! I don't get all those that disagree with this. You'd have to stuff the M10 into very tight jeans for the gain setting wheel to move. For me too it is a definite advantage to be able to change gain without taking off the hold switch.

And as Belixes points out, it is nice that when you change gain you don't introduce noise into the recording. The noise introduced by the HR is horrible-you'd only want to change during applause, etc. where it could easily be edited out. I know people say never change the gain during a recording but I sometimes do it once (usually after the first song during the applause) if I notice my initial gain setting way way too low.
AT853's (all caps)/CM-300 Franken Naks (CP-1,2,3)/JBMod Nak 700's (CP-701,702) > Tascam DR-680
Or Sonic Studios DSM-6 > M10

Offline it-goes-to-eleven

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6696
Re: Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10
« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2010, 03:39:18 PM »
IMHO, the gain knob is a disadvantage in every way...     Button-based gain changes allow you to change the gain without ever removing the unit from a pocket.  So you can change gain with security looking right at you.

Offline illconditioned

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2999
Re: Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2010, 03:46:01 PM »
I've never used the Edirol R09HR, just the plain R09.

However, I love the M10.  What I do is keep the unit in my shirt pocket, facing inward, towards me.  I can quickly look down at the LEDS on the top.  I'm looking for Green (signal), and just drop the volume if they go Red (overload).  If I'm sure of the levels, I just tape the wheel with a bit of gaffers tape.

If you're getting just one unit, I highly recommend the Sony.  It works great for both ambient and live music recording.  I usually just set the level to #4/10 or so, and the only control I adjust is the high/low sensitivity.  You'll discover pretty quickly what level works for your given mic setup.  And, as mentioned earlier, the battery life is outstanding.  I just leave the unit on always, and lock it when not in use.

  Richard
Please DO NOT mail me with tech questions.  I will try to answer in the forums when I get a chance.  Thanks.

Sample recordings at: http://www.soundmann.com.

Online Chris K

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
  • Bound to cover just a little more ground
Re: Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10
« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2010, 04:41:28 PM »
IMHO, the gain knob is a disadvantage in every way...     Button-based gain changes allow you to change the gain without ever removing the unit from a pocket.  So you can change gain with security looking right at you.

A small piece of gaffers tape solves that problem.    edit...as I misread your post and thought it was concerned about accidentally turning the M10 gain knob.

Now to correctly respond...Why would you change the gain with the recorder in your pocket? How do you know the hold is off and if  your' adjustments' are having any effect on the r-09 while its in your pocket? Wouldn't you want to see the meters when you change the gain? And let's face it, you can easily turn a dial on the M10 while it is in your pocket. Not to call anyone out, but I guess I just don't see what the big deal is with changing gain while the recorder is in your pocket.....it can be done with buttons that you press, it can be done with a knob that you turn.

Having used both the R-09 and the M10 it is my opinoin that the M10 is superior in battery life, sound quality (on board mics), metering, and user friendliness.
« Last Edit: December 28, 2010, 07:48:44 PM by Chris K »
My gear: JK Labs AKG DVC > M10
              AKG 460 ck61/ck62/ck63 > DR-70D
             
A live concert to me is exciting because of all the electricity that is generated in the crowd and on stage. It's my favorite part of the business, live concerts.
-Elvis Presley

Offline willndmb

  • Trade Count: (17)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Gender: Male
Re: Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10
« Reply #7 on: December 28, 2010, 05:53:55 PM »
sounds like there will be a r09hr for sale soon
Mics - AKG ck61/ck63 (c480b & Naiant actives), SP-BMC-2
XLR Cables - Silver Path w/Darktrain stubbies
Interconnect Cables - Dogstar (XLR), Darktrain (RCA > 1/8) (1/8 > 1/8), and Kind Kables (1/8f > 1/4)
Preamps - Naiant Littlebox & Tinybox
Recorders - PCM-M10 & DR-60D

Offline Belexes

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
  • Gender: Male
Re: Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10
« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2010, 09:52:49 PM »
^ For cheap!  ;D
Busman Audio BSC1-K1/K2/K3/K4 > HiHo Silver XLR's > Deck TBD

CA-14 (c,o)/MM-HLSC-1 (4.7k mod)/AT853(4.7k mod)(c,o,h,sc)/CAFS (o)/CA-1 (o) > CA-9100 (V. 4.1)/CA-9200/CA-UBB > Sony PCM-D50/Sony PCM-M10

stevetoney

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10
« Reply #9 on: December 28, 2010, 11:23:59 PM »
They're both good but the M10 is better.

Offline gmm6797

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3593
  • Gender: Male
  • Schoeps MK4 > nBoxPlat > Sony A10/SDMixPre6/SD 722
    • Homepage
Re: Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10
« Reply #10 on: December 29, 2010, 12:34:20 AM »
moved to the m10 and never looked back, not even for a nano-second

Offline cgresq192

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 117
Re: Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10
« Reply #11 on: December 31, 2010, 02:40:58 PM »
OK

Ya'll convinced me

R09-HR in the yard sale
DPA 4061's > CA-9100>(3wire)>R-09HR
SPCMC4(AT853's)>CA-9100(3wire)>R-09HR

Offline illconditioned

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2999
Re: Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10
« Reply #12 on: December 31, 2010, 05:40:07 PM »
OK

Ya'll convinced me

R09-HR in the yard sale
I wouldn't be so fast to sell the Edirol.  You'll have trouble getting a good price for it (probably).  Just keep it as a backup, or to run at the soundboard if you get a feed.

  Richard
Please DO NOT mail me with tech questions.  I will try to answer in the forums when I get a chance.  Thanks.

Sample recordings at: http://www.soundmann.com.

Offline rainydaybloke

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10
« Reply #13 on: January 04, 2011, 12:27:37 AM »
So can anyone recommend an online seller, pref with a good price? All the ones I've checked are out of stock. Is the next model (M11?) about to be released?

I need a replacement R-09 because of the dreaded bad input connection problem which forces me to use the onboard mics, and they ain't so great.
I'm also considering the Tascam DR-2D ... anyone used both Sony and Tascam?

Offline colargol

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 184
Re: Who Went from a R-09HR to PCM-M10
« Reply #14 on: January 04, 2011, 11:31:22 AM »
So can anyone recommend an online seller, pref with a good price? All the ones I've checked are out of stock. Is the next model (M11?) about to be released?

I need a replacement R-09 because of the dreaded bad input connection problem which forces me to use the onboard mics, and they ain't so great.
I'm also considering the Tascam DR-2D ... anyone used both Sony and Tascam?

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/638090-REG/Sony_PCM_M10_BLACK_PCM_M10_Portable_Audio_Recorder.html
MK4s/MK41s > nbob actives > tinybox/babynbox/riotbox > M10/A10/PR-2

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.192 seconds with 47 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF