Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass  (Read 11283 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Shaun

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« on: March 30, 2011, 04:32:15 AM »
Used my new PCM-M10 for the first time last night to record Deer Hunter. The sound at the gig wasn't that good, the bass was distorted (but very present!) for the most part. Used my SP-CMC-20 mics & battery box into line in. Just had a quick listen on headphones and although the recording is clear it's really lacking in bass. I'd previously used the same set up into a Sharp MD recorder and picked up some nice bass on recordings. Do I need to go with no bass roll off in the battery box? (I've just left the bass roll off on the same setting it arrived with).

Offline beatkilla

  • Trade Count: (83)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2278
  • Gender: Male
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2011, 08:46:08 AM »
Am i wrong or i thought bass roll off does not work thru line in only mic in?

Offline Shaun

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2011, 09:07:37 AM »
The low cut filter in the pcm-m10 only works with mic in. I'm referring to the bass roll off in the microphone battery box, which is plugged into line in.

Offline rjp

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 432
  • Gender: Male
  • You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2011, 09:14:28 AM »
In the vast majority of cases, bass rolloff should be turned OFF, period. If you have a really boomy room it might help, but otherwise, you're doing exactly what the name says: cutting out bass.
Mics: AKG Perception 170, Naiant X-X, Sound Professionals SP-TFB-2
Preamps: Naiant Littlebox
Recorders: Olympus LS-10
Interfaces: Focusrite Saffire Pro 14, Focusrite Scarlett 2i2

Offline Shaun

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2011, 09:44:03 AM »
It's just that I've not changed any settings from when I was using minidisc.

Online aaronji

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 4220
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2011, 12:06:03 PM »
The low cut filter in the pcm-m10 only works with mic in.

Are you sure about this?  I was under the impression that the low-cut on the M10 works regardless of input mode (internal, mic, line)...

I'm referring to the bass roll off in the microphone battery box, which is plugged into line in.

One possibility is that the input impedance on your MD and the M10 are not the same, causing substantial differences in where the roll-off kicks in (here is mshilarious' explanation:  http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=105993.msg1415476#msg1415476).  Also, guysonic mentioned that the M10 rolls-off some very low frequency bass (http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=130924.msg1722494#msg1722494), although he says that occurs below 20 Hz so it might not be very noticeable (and it's not clear to me if he is referring only to mic-in or if it affects line as well)...

Offline Shaun

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2011, 02:25:46 PM »
The low cut filter in the pcm-m10 only works with mic in.

Are you sure about this?  I was under the impression that the low-cut on the M10 works regardless of input mode (internal, mic, line)...

I'm referring to the bass roll off in the microphone battery box, which is plugged into line in.

Actually I think you're right, just checking now and although I could have sworn the low-cut filter was off when I set up it seems to have been on. If that's the case it's a really severe filter! The show was really full on sound-wise, to the point of distortion, but the recording sounds weak and distant.

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40703
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #7 on: March 31, 2011, 01:05:55 AM »
I would leave the low-cut OFF. You can always take away bass in post-editing ;)
Schoeps MK 4V's & MK 41V's & 250|0 KCY's ->
Naiant +60v & +48v Low Noise PFA's ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

https://archive.org/details/@diskobean
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline Shaun

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #8 on: March 31, 2011, 05:57:47 AM »
Many thanks for all your advice. I had no intention of using the low-cut filter, but now having done a few quick test comparisons with it switched on and off I'm suprised by how severe it is. It's makes the recording sound like your using a boom box condender mic! I'll just chalk this one down to experience.

Offline darktrain

  • Trade Count: (715)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2874
  • Gender: Male
  • Whats next?
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #9 on: April 01, 2011, 11:05:24 AM »
Many thanks for all your advice. I had no intention of using the low-cut filter, but now having done a few quick test comparisons with it switched on and off I'm suprised by how severe it is. It's makes the recording sound like your using a boom box condender mic! I'll just chalk this one down to experience.

Also what headphones did you listen back to it on? That makes a huge difference as well, cheaper ones have very poor bass response usually,  like most "stock" ear buds for example

Offline Shaun

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #10 on: April 02, 2011, 06:46:15 AM »
I listened back through my hi-fi (NAD amp and mission speakers).

adrianf74

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #11 on: April 02, 2011, 07:49:37 AM »
+1 to leaving low cut (bass roll off) filter off.  I had the original SP-CMC-8's (AT-933/c) and with my MiniDisc, I would record my shows with bass roll-off at 69Hz as I felt the recordings I'd made were "boomy" otherwise.  Now that I listen to them, I think I should've left roll-off "off."

In 2010, I upgraded to CA-14's and Chris, and others, said you should never run roll-off or low-cut filters with card mics because it'll toast any bass you don't have.

As far as your "distorted bass at the source" goes, I've recorded over 300 shows in about 20-year's time and I've left many-a-venue where the sound was distorted to my ears and the recording was fine. I've also had a couple of instances where I was too close to the stacks at that point and "blew out" my recording.

As long as you're not too close to the stacks (30 feet), the distortion shouldn't translate. 

Hope this helped.

Offline Shaun

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #12 on: April 04, 2011, 03:35:42 AM »
Yes, I have the same experience regarding the distorted at source sound rarely being present on a recording. It's the same with the one I've just done, no distortion, but also no bass.
I haven't got any gigs lined up until next month, but I will be going with no roll off on either PCM-M10 or mics. I'll let you know how it turns out.

adrianf74

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #13 on: April 05, 2011, 09:35:08 AM »
Yes, I have the same experience regarding the distorted at source sound rarely being present on a recording. It's the same with the one I've just done, no distortion, but also no bass.
I haven't got any gigs lined up until next month, but I will be going with no roll off on either PCM-M10 or mics. I'll let you know how it turns out.

Cardioid mics do have "less bass pickup" so I would suggest you leave your roll-off/filter to OFF.  If your recording has "too much" bass, you can always EQ it out, however, you can't add what's missing.

Offline hi and lo

  • Trade Count: (38)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2294
Re: First recording with PCM-M10 - Very little bass
« Reply #14 on: April 05, 2011, 12:31:13 PM »
In the vast majority of cases, bass rolloff should be turned OFF, period. If you have a really boomy room it might help, but otherwise, you're doing exactly what the name says: cutting out bass.

I strongly disagree with the sentiment that there's rarely a need for bass roll-off as you can just EQ in post. Bass roll-off is a tool that, if used properly, should be a part of any recordists arsenal.

Bass roll-off is useful in the microphone > recorder signal path because it will increase the dynamic range available to all frequencies present. Rather than try to explain this myself, here is a perfect quote that expresses why roll-off is beneficial:

Quote from: jon kjoll
Removing some of the low frequency energy leaves the system more robust wrt to taking good care of the higher frequencies. The upshot is less strain on power supplies, reduced loss in signal caps, less intermodulation distortion, less harmonics added etc .. "

You can't argue that roll-off, if done properly, isn't beneficial.

However, most bass-roll (especially with the microphones, preamps and battery boxes, and recorders used by the people on this forum) is not done properly hence the fear to use it outside of post-processing. I feel this is primarily a result of the companies marketing products to tapers and their mis-information (or lack of instruction) on how the science of roll-off works.

Bass roll-off values are not static and dependent on the downstream input impedance! For example, many battery boxes commonly marketing with selectable values of bass roll-off are assuming a common input impedance value... typically 10k ohms. If you use a recorder with an input impedance of 10k ohms, great, but many do not. Input impedances of the various recorders can differ as much as 10 fold!!! Some are as low as 4.7k (many Sony mic inputs) and some are as high as 47k (Sony line inputs). 20k is  an extremely common value, which effectively halves the roll-off provided. If you've set your bbox to start roll-off at 120 Hz roll-off, the reality is you're starting it at 60 hZ which is hardly the same.

If you don't know the input impedance of your recording device, you won't know the amount of bass roll-off you are actually providing! If you know your recorder's input impedance, but not the assumed value in the product's User manual, you're really just hoping it's a close match to your recorder. I have a big pet peeve with the fact that this isn't clearly documented with every battery box or preamp sold by most/all microphone manufacturers. To do it right, you need to provide a chart of the various recorders' input impedances and keep it updated as new recorders hit the market.

All that aside, I want to reiterate that roll-off is not something to fear, so long as you do it right! Doing it in post is acceptable and much easier, but there are very real benefits to doing it upstream of the recording device which, I feel, are generally misunderstood.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2011, 12:40:44 PM by hi and lo »

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.076 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2025 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF