hi gang. i finally got an edirol r09 and i went out to a local bar that had some random band playing for a test run. i brought along my iriver h320 also and taped for a bit with one recorder and then switched to the other one so i could compare. i was kinda disappointed with the results. ive heard such great things about the r09, i was expecting a somewhat significant improvement from the iriver. but there didnt seem to be much difference. i sent a sample of each to a friend of mine (also a taper) and he said the iriver actually sounds better because the r09 has some distortion. i guess i dont have as delicate of an ear as some people do for this stuff because i cant really hear any distortion, but...who knows. so i thought id get the experts' thoughts
heres a sample of each (needless to say, the file that starts with 'R09' is the edirol r09, the other is the iriver):
http://www.sendspace.com/file/73gfpgso id like to know 3 things:
1. which sounds better?
2. does the r09 sample sound distorted?
3. if so, what do i need to do to fix it (adjust the settings? something else?)
heres the technical info:
Church-Audio STC-11 Cardioid Mics -> BAT-2B -> iRiver H320
Church-Audio STC-11 Cardioid Mics -> BAT-2B -> Edirol R09
settings for r09:
line in
AGC: off
low cut: off
mic gain: high
input level around: 17 or 18
levels between 12 and 6 (so not too hot)
thanks for the help