Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Omni vs. figure 8 - best for taming wind noise  (Read 3259 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Massive Dynamic

  • Trade Count: (21)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1445
  • Gender: Male
  • 20 years of the best in apocalyptic gothic metal
Omni vs. figure 8 - best for taming wind noise
« on: June 16, 2011, 02:18:58 PM »
I'll be recording at an outdoor festival again this summer, and I'll either run blumlein or mini j-disk with omnis. I've had good results with both. In case of stronger winds, and with omnis being the least susceptible, does that make the figure 8 the most susceptible?
Naiant X-X > SP-SPSB-1 > M10
Superlux S502 > Denecke PS-2 > Hosa MIT-435 > M10

Offline page

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Gender: Male
  • #TeamRetired
Re: Omni vs. figure 8 - best for taming wind noise
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2011, 02:20:02 PM »
I'll be recording at an outdoor festival again this summer, and I'll either run blumlein or mini j-disk with omnis. I've had good results with both. In case of stronger winds, and with omnis being the least susceptible, does that make the figure 8 the most susceptible?

In my experience, yes.
"This is a common practice we have on the bus; debating facts that we could easily find through printed material. It's like, how far is it today? I think it's four hours, and someone else comes in at 11 hours, and well, then we'll... just... talk about it..." - Jeb Puryear

"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be." - Jim Williams

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 16587
  • Gender: Male
  • We create auditory illusions, not reproductions
Re: Omni vs. figure 8 - best for taming wind noise
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2011, 05:06:27 PM »
And that experience based yes is backed up by theory AFAIK.

The greater the percentage of velocity component vs pressure component that a mic capsule employs, the more susceptible to wind and handling noise it will be.  That means for single diaphragm mics, figure 8's are more susceptible than supercardioids, which are more susceptible than cardioids which are more susceptible than subcardioids, which are more susceptible than pressure omnis.

I think that also means that LDCs with variable patterns derived by electrically switching two back to back cardioid diaphragms will have the same wind susceptibility in all positions, since physically the mic is always two cardioids (cardioid being an equal sum of figure-8 and omni components), with the outputs of those two capsules electrically mixed in various combinations and polarities to achieve the resulting polar patterns.  Hopefully someone who knows better than I can confirm or refute that.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline John Willett

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
  • Gender: Male
  • Bio:
    • Sound-Link ProAudio
Re: Omni vs. figure 8 - best for taming wind noise
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2011, 06:30:21 AM »
Yes - fig-8s are more susceptible to wind noise.

Many, though, have a drooping bass end which does help a bit.

If outdoors in MS I would use in a decent Rycote stereo windshield with windjammer.

Offline DSatz

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (35)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3412
  • Gender: Male
Re: Omni vs. figure 8 - best for taming wind noise
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2011, 12:40:15 AM »
Gutbucket, you're right in general about dual-diaphragm, switchable-pattern microphones--they are sensitive to wind, breath noise, handling noise and external vibration even when set to their "omnidirectional" pattern. They even have some proximity effect in the omni setting, which a pressure transducer wouldn't have at all. Their sensitivity to wind isn't necessarily identical in all pattern settings, but it is certainly greater than that of a pressure transducer in any case.

--best regards
music > microphones > a recorder of some sort

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.049 seconds with 28 queries.
© 2002-2025 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF