Topic: Matrix Aud & SBD in Wavelab6

[deadheadcorey]

with two different recorders I've always used the "chop method".

http://www.taperssection.com/reference/pdf/Wavelab5Matrix_MikeB.pdf

thanks for this gordon, best thing ever... just did the 1st set of a show and this worked like a charm! 

[runonce]

with two different recorders I've always used the "chop method".

http://www.taperssection.com/reference/pdf/Wavelab5Matrix_MikeB.pdf

thanks for this gordon, best thing ever... just did the 1st set of a show and this worked like a charm! 

Great if the band is only playing 3 minute songs all night - but it really doesnt address the drift...the first time you have a long jam - or two songs joined together - the drift will become noticeable again.

The other is issue here is musical - one recording is faster - and a higher pitch than the other. You want both recordings to be "in tune" with each other for the most musical effect.

[Gordon]

when I use to do the chop method I didn't bust into actual tracks but split it every 3-5 mins or so as mentioned.

[F.O.Bean]

when I use to do the chop method I didn't bust into actual tracks but split it every 3-5 mins or so as mentioned.

Howd you do that w/ out time stretching the files?

[deadheadcorey]

well this is what the final product turn out to be >>>

http://www-tracey.archive.org/details/shakedownst2012-05-19.mtx.kindrec

[runonce]

when I use to do the chop method I didn't bust into actual tracks but split it every 3-5 mins or so as mentioned.

Howd you do that w/ out time stretching the files?

I think they are ignoring the time difference and just resyncing each segment.

And - It still leaves you with two, ever so slightly out of tune sources, playing together.