Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Best way to Document M10 lineage?  (Read 3153 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline IceMan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2233
  • Gender: Male
  • i don't like you.you're dangerous
    • My Blog(s)
Best way to Document M10 lineage?
« on: May 06, 2013, 12:09:57 PM »
Greetings.
I recently got an M10 and ran it for the first time this past weekend.
It now comes to me writing down/keeping track of the lineage.  I used to have a D8 and would do something like mic->rolloff->d8 @44.1 khz for example.
The M10 how would I do this for the M10?  mic->rolloff->M10 (then mode?  Like LPCM 44/24?  Is it needed to be that clear etc?

Thank you for your thoughts/opinion.
When I die I won't own crap..but my kids will have a hell of a music collection to fight over.  http://toddiet123.blogspot.com/  Yes..Yes I can help you track Caspian shows.

Offline acidjack

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5845
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best way to Document M10 lineage?
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2013, 12:49:15 PM »
I'd either do mic>etc>M10 (24/48) or, as I do, Mic>etc>M10>24bit/48kHz WAV>processing etc>FLAC
Mics: Schoeps MK4V, MK41V, MK5, MK22> CMC6, KCY 250/5, KC5, NBob; MBHO MBP603/KA200N, AT 3031, DPA 4061 w/ d:vice, Naiant X-X, AT 853c, shotgun, Nak300
Pres/Power: Aerco MP2, tinybox v2  [KCY], CA-UBB
Decks: Sound Devices MixPre 6, Zoom F8, M10, D50

My recordings on nyctaper.com: http://www.nyctaper.com/?tag=acidjack | LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/acidjack | twitter: http://www.twitter.com/acidjacknyc | Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/acidjacknyc

Offline IceMan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2233
  • Gender: Male
  • i don't like you.you're dangerous
    • My Blog(s)
Re: Best way to Document M10 lineage?
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2013, 01:00:34 PM »
I'd either do mic>etc>M10 (24/48) or, as I do, Mic>etc>M10>24bit/48kHz WAV>processing etc>FLAC

Thanks much.  I've heard some of your stuff so you'd suggest 24/48?  I am new to the device so of course toggling for my needs will come, but always like a good springboard.
Thank you again for a response.
When I die I won't own crap..but my kids will have a hell of a music collection to fight over.  http://toddiet123.blogspot.com/  Yes..Yes I can help you track Caspian shows.

Offline page

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Gender: Male
  • #TeamRetired
Re: Best way to Document M10 lineage?
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2013, 02:19:48 PM »
I'd either do mic>etc>M10 (24/48) or, as I do, Mic>etc>M10>24bit/48kHz WAV>processing etc>FLAC

Thats what I do. I have a separate transfer line in mine.

One thing is, I state the bitrate where the ADC was:

4021 > V3 > 722 (24/44.1)
4021 > V3 (24/44.1) > 722

Those lines tell me something different. I only see a couple others do that, and it's personal preference.

so you'd suggest 24/48?

Depends on what you want to achieve (what's the final end result, do you have a good resampling algorithm, etc). Most here use either 24/44.1 or 24/48 and resample later if they need a CD Audio compatible output.
"This is a common practice we have on the bus; debating facts that we could easily find through printed material. It's like, how far is it today? I think it's four hours, and someone else comes in at 11 hours, and well, then we'll... just... talk about it..." - Jeb Puryear

"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be." - Jim Williams

Offline morst

  • I think I found an error on the internet; #UnionStrong
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6125
Re: Best way to Document M10 lineage?
« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2013, 02:42:11 PM »
Depends on what you want to achieve (what's the final end result, do you have a good resampling algorithm, etc). Most here use either 24/44.1 or 24/48 and resample later if they need a CD Audio compatible output.
I definitely like 24/48.
Less and less does anyone need CD, and those that do can resample their own with just about any burning software (nero, itunes, toast).

I agree that the bit depth / sample rate should be listed with the ADC stage. If there's resampling, be sure to list the final output's depth/rate so downloaders will know what they're getting. On a high-def recording, if the metadata doesn't mention resample/ bit reduction, I usually assume that it has not been resampled or reduced.
https://toad.social/@morst spoutible.com/morst post.news/@acffhmorst

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.05 seconds with 28 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF