Meanwhile, Curtis Judd has published a YouTube comparative review of the F3 vs the H1 XLR. It really makes me angry. The review is substantially based on noise measurements taken in a studio environment, which is not where 99% of users will be using the devices (field recorders). The review does not, as far as I can see, include a single sample from either recorder. In my real-world tests, self noise is not a practical issue. Why on earth would he publish a review where he does not allow viewers to make up their own minds based on actual recordings? I would lay money that if he had uploaded comparative samples from the two recorders without identifying which was which, very few people would have got the answer right.
Sadly the review has received thousands of views, and many of the comments are scathing about the H1 XLR, based on what they have just been told. No, it is not the world's best recorder. Yes, the F3 at twice the price (usually) is, on paper at least, the better device. But I would be sad if people now didn't buy the H1 XLR who might actually have been perfectly happy with it as a device whose capabilities are perfectly adequate for most whose budgets don'r extend to more expensive kit.