Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Comp: Microtech Gefell Nbob actives/PFA vs MV400x bodies  (Read 3439 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Gordon

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 11875
  • Gender: Male
    • my list
Comp: Microtech Gefell Nbob actives/PFA vs MV400x bodies
« on: July 29, 2025, 04:58:51 PM »
https://bit.ly/4obiPj1


Nbob actives/PFA vs MV400x bodies

Source ? Microtech Gefell M21 (dina) > Nbob actives > Naiant PFA  > Sound Devices MixPre-6 II @ 32/48

Source ? Microtech Gefell MV400x/M21 (dina) > Sound Devices MixPre-6 II @ 32/48

Both sets of mics on same stand using a vark bar inches apart (not blocking each other) approx 11.25' & 11.5' high roc in OTS

The gain was raised just below 0 and matched on both sources as best I could.  MBIT+ dither from 32bit to 24bit.  Gain and dither done with iZotope RX 11. No other editing was done.

Foobar users install ABX Comparator

https://www.foobar2000.org/components/view/foo_abx

Once installed load the 2 files you want to A/B, right click > utilities > ABX tracks.  Hit OK, you can then toggle between both files.


Post your thoughts and PM me for the answer!
Microtech Gefell M20/M21 > Nbob actives > Naiant PFA > Sound Devices MixPre-6 II @ 32/48

Microtech Gefell MV400x M20/M21 > Sound Devices MixPre-6 II @ 32/48

https://archive.org/details/fav-gordonlw

https://archive.org/details/teamdirtysouth

Online jbell

  • TDS
  • Trade Count: (149)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4654
  • Gender: Male
  • Spreadicated
Re: Comp: Microtech Gefell Nbob actives/PFA vs MV400x bodies
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2025, 02:51:34 PM »
Both sound great!  I'm not hearing a big difference.  Need to break out the cans.
Mics: DPA ST4011ER, 4018ER | Neumann kk 184, kk 185 > Nbob/PFA | Schoeps mk41 > KCY 250/ 5 Ig > PFA
Preamps: DPA MMA 6000
Recorders: Sound Devices Mixpre-10 II | Sony PCM A10

-20        -12         -6        TDS   (32/48)     
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]][}   
]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]][} 
__________________________
|Record|  Runtime: 4:19.99  {|||] 75%

Offline papabliss

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 95
Re: Comp: Microtech Gefell Nbob actives/PFA vs MV400x bodies
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2025, 05:55:43 PM »
Both sound very good. I prefer A. It is a little fuller.


Offline Billy Mumphrey

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1495
Re: Comp: Microtech Gefell Nbob actives/PFA vs MV400x bodies
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2025, 12:57:57 AM »
Finally listened to this. Both sound good, very similiar, but it seems all the B samples have a bit more high end and presence. A little more hyped. A subtle difference but my ears notice it. I think I prefer A.
formerly known as "Chanher"

location, location, location

Offline tonyd

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Re: Comp: Microtech Gefell Nbob actives/PFA vs MV400x bodies
« Reply #4 on: August 28, 2025, 02:21:45 AM »
Both sound great. As mentioned, I hear a higher end presence in B, which I like. Tomorrow I am going to listen a bit closer.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nak 300 ~ Line Audio CM4 ~ Line Audio Omni1 ~ Audio Technica 853 ~ Church Audio CA-11 ~ CMC-8
Lunatec V2
Tascam FR-AV2 ~ Tascam DR-100 MKII

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.041 seconds with 29 queries.
© 2002-2025 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF