Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Zoom F8N for recording live album  (Read 271 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Thelonious

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • *
  • Posts: 261
Zoom F8N for recording live album
« on: Yesterday at 09:40:50 AM »
Lately I’ve been thinking about what it would take to take some of my live recordings to the next level.

The thinking is, there are quite a few shows that are too small for a FOH (or at least the FOH is providing only sound reinforcement, not the full mix) where I would like to get a couple of mics on the drums, one directly on each of the guitar and bass and one, a pair of inputs from the board and a stereo pair for the room sound. This would not be common, but I would like the option.

I am happy with my mixpre 6ii and my F3. That said, the mixpre 10 is 2800 CAD right now and the zoom F8n is 1k. I may lean towards the mixpre mic Pres for very quiet sound sources, however, I would not expect that to be relevant to this application at all so I’m indifferent on this aspect.

My questions are:
1) is the type of recording I’m looking at feasible or am I missing something entirely and
2) is there anything about the zoom I may not be aware of that would make it less suitable for this application?

Thank you in advance for any perspectives on this.

Offline jefflester

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1785
  • Gender: Male
Re: Zoom F8N for recording live album
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 01:33:10 PM »
Yeah, I do it all the time with my bands. I'm not recording a "live album" per se, but just documenting my gigs. For the stereo pair for the room, I usually have it as stage mics rather than anything out in the crowd/by the board or other typical taper location. Good way to pick up drums.
DPA4061 HEB -> R-09 / AT943 -> CA-UGLY -> Edirol R-09
AKG CK63 -> nBob actives -> Baby NBox -> Edirola R-09/Tascam DR2d
AKG CK63 -> AKG C460B -> Zoom F8/Tascam DR-680MKII
Line Audio CM4 > Tascam Dr60d/Zoom F3
Line Audio CM4/Superlux S502/Samson C02/iSK Little Gem/Sennheiser E609/Shure SM57 -> Zoom F8/DR-680MKII (multitracked band recordings)

Offline EmRR

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 885
    • ElectroMagnetic Radiation Recorders
Re: Zoom F8N for recording live album
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 01:56:28 PM »
I used my F8n on some of the Avett Brothers Third Gleam record which is acoustic, some of it quiet. Use good mics, no problem. Yeah, you can split hairs, but it’s not ‘big picture’.
Mics: DPA 4060 w/MPS 6030 PSU/DAD6001/DAD4099, Neumann KM 131, Oktava MK 012, Sennheiser MKH 105, MKH 20, MKH 30, MKH 40, MKH 800 TWIN, Rode NT-FS1.
Recorders: Zoom F8n, Sony MZ-R50

Offline Billy Mumphrey

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1532
Re: Zoom F8N for recording live album
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 02:01:40 PM »
I have also done many of these types of recordings and it's a lot of fun playing around with different techniques. Go with your instincts first and then adjust your technique based on the results you want. Don't forget to delay your direct mics (guitar, bass) and board feed in relation to the audience mics. Most of the time bass amps have an XLR output and I just use that (but don't send phantom to their amp head!).

Good news, the Zoom F8n Pro has just been price dropped from $1k to $699. I ordered one just in case it was a temporary sale. I don't think it is, BUT you never know.
formerly known as "Chanher"

location, location, location

Offline mrfender

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 616
Re: Zoom F8N for recording live album
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 02:58:44 PM »
Good news, the Zoom F8n Pro has just been price dropped from $1k to $699. I ordered one just in case it was a temporary sale. I don't think it is, BUT you never know.

there's one on Reverb for $600.  Very tempted myself but do not need more equipment.

Or so I lie to myself.
DR2d, DR-44wl, DR-680, PCM-M10, Roland R-07, PCM-A10, Zoom F3
CA-14 card/omni, AT853 cards/omni, Nak CM-300 cards, Line Audio CM4 & OM-1, Neumann KM-184

Online Thelonious

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • *
  • Posts: 261
Re: Zoom F8N for recording live album
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 04:40:33 PM »
Okay, thanks. It sounds like it will work fine.

Yeas the $699 US price is $999 CAD in Canada. It’s still ~40% of the cost of a mixpre 10 and gives me the inputs I need.


Thanks all for the input!

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 16927
  • Gender: Male
  • We create auditory illusions, not reproductions
Re: Zoom F8N for recording live album
« Reply #6 on: Yesterday at 06:16:38 PM »
What they said. Either recorder will work well for what you plan to do.  I use an Zoom F8 for this typo of recording regularly, like it and can recommend it.

Have you recorded using a rig on-stage before? Say, a standard stereo pair setup on stage or right up against the lip of the stage?  That experience will be helpful in quickly developing a feel for what's great and not so great about recording onstage compared to recording from a position out in the audience.

There are a few ways to go about it, and basically the difference boils down to using a primary array for recording most everything, verses mic'ing lots of separate things on stage and assembling it all together via the mix.  There is no hard and fast line between the two.  You might add some stuff to the first (like sbd, a spot mic or two if needed, audience/room facing mics), and a stereo pair capturing a good portion of the stage content may be part of the second.

I prefer the first for a number of reasons: Ease of setup, quicker mixing, and because I find I'm able to produce a more natural sounding recording with more compelling sense of imaging and depth that way.

I do that by strategically placing a bigger mic array on stage in such a way that it picks up clear direct sound from each of the on-stage sources in way that's relatively well balanced in terms of level and position, along with room/audience sound, all from essentially a single location.  In the right situation that's all that's needed, and makes for a great recording if/when the situation allows for it. Although it's essentially all in a single position (the array might actually span 3' to 6' wide depending on the situation), it incorporates multiple microphone channels, including a backwards facing pair picking up the room and audience.  Still it essentially acts like a single rig in a single placement location on-stage. That helps with really good imaging and depth. Using mics which are sufficiently insensitive to sound arriving from the opposite direction helps greatly.  The total coverage is collectively omnidirectional, while each "slice" is significantly directional excluding sound from the opposite direction. Keeping the rear room/audience facing mics together with the forward facing mics makes things a lot easier and happily maintains natural alignment, eliminating the need to delay the forward facing mics to match time-of-arrival with the audience/room pair. (If including SBD you may or may not need to delay that). It also makes for an enhanced and more realistic portrayal of depth, provides a more engaged and energetic audience reaction from the folks into it upfront rather than distracted talkers farther back, and makes for good integration of the various contributions from the array in the mix without extensive effort. 

I like to place that kind of main array on stage relatively centered amongst the musicians, low to the floor and slightly to one side of the drum kit if present, with a direct line of sight to the snare drum. If that ends up close to the drums I'm careful to setup slightly over toward the snare side, somewhat off-axis from the kick drum, avoiding the potential of air-puffs from the hole in the kick drum head impinging on the mics.  Guitar and keyboard amps placed on the floor can be pretty far away and will still strongly and clearly project to the recording position as long as they're relatively on-axis with it.  Clear sound from a guitar or keyboard amp placed on the stage floor travels amazingly far along the stage surface.  Closer physical proximity to the bass often helps, and to piano if there is one.  If I can get all the instruments well represented from that single recoding location, the recoding often works out really nicely.  If you have the opportunity to stick your head where you plan to place the recording rig, close your eyes and listen carefully for a bit while the band plays for soundcheck.  That will tell you a lot and careful listening while moving around to find the best spot is super helpful.

If necessary and if available record a soundboard feed.  I usually only use it for vocals or quiet close-mic'd instruments that are aren't otherwise well represented except through the PA and on-stage monitors.

If the musicians are arranged widely, or for some reason I'm unable get a good balance of some quieter instrument, singer, or whatever, I might place a separate spot mic or compact stereo pair near them to help get level from them.  I mostly do that as an insurance policy (sort of like getting a SBD feed when there are no vocals) and may or may not actually use it in the resulting mixdown,.  But doing so sometimes helps by keeping placement of the main recoding array focused on picking up most everything else in good balance, rather than picking up everything altogether including the more distant and/or quieter outliers of the ensemble.

I prefer that approach for a few reasons:  Its simpler for me to setup and mix, and I find it makes for a more compelling recoding when everything works right.


The alternate method is spot or close-mic'ing more sources, and producing a mix using panned placement of the various channels (rather than reinforcing the main stereo pair with a spot or two). Closer to front of house style mixing, sort of making your own sbd feed in a way.  That provides excellent control over balance and clarity, but like a sbd feed it can sometimes end up sounding overly close and flat, lacking really good imaging and stage depth cues.  And it means you'll need to rely more strongly on your spot/close mics, making them more of a necessity rather than an option where needed, and the setup usually ends up being more complex.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to for the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: Version 4 provided in individual sections rather than a single booklet)

Online Thelonious

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • *
  • Posts: 261
Re: Zoom F8N for recording live album
« Reply #7 on: Today at 08:32:29 AM »
Thanks again for the thoughtful feedback.

I recorded stage lip for my main recording session each month. Sometimes I will use a 6mic array, sometimes just a stereo pair with an F3. The main limitations are:
Band members rotate in and out of the jam and one location small room/stage so if they don’t have the right touch it can compromise the mix
Occasionally the trumpet player will use a mic to amplify the trumpet with a silencer so if I don’t have a “board feed” this can be low in the mix (it’s just one mic usually used for stage talk but in this situation the mix would be better with a feed)
Sometimes on a mid sized stage the drums can be further back and some of the detail lost when the mix gets busier


When I run a 6 mic array with the mixpre 6,I don’t have channels available for a board feed. I have also had a drummer ask me to record one of his projects for an album and, to do that, I would want at least two mics for drums, one for bass (or DI) one for the keyboards and some room mics and have available channels for an additional instruments. I can also see a situation where I want to record with 2 vocals, guitar, bass, and drums in a room.

When I saw the F8 going for what I thought was a good deal I thought I’d check with owners to see if there was anything I’m missing. I use, and love, my F3 for two channel recordings primarily based on the size of it. It works and sounds great. I’m used to my mixpre 6 and how to set up more complicated mic arrays but, I have finally found 6 channels limiting for certain use cases (though certainly not for standard audience recording where 6 channels is pretty good). I really just wanted to make sure there wasn’t something about the interface or hardware that makes running 8 channels at once impractical for some reason (e.g., power draw is such that a talent cell only lasts 90 min, can’t send onatom power to 8 channels at once, etc.).


After doing some research the only downside that I see is it looks like I need to run a talentcell to hirose adapter for power and can’t just use a usb c bank like I do for the F3 and MP6ii. The only other critique I found was limiting the paring between multiple channels was not entirely intuitive (if you paired channels the initial mix changed). Neither of these are big issues for me. I turn off the main mix channels on my MP to save space and just recording my input channels and mix in post and I can use a talentcell, it just would have been easier to use my existing usb power banks.

 It looks like a very good deal on 8 channels with solid preamps and at ~40% of the cost of a MP10 with no significant trade offs.

Thanks again for all the feedback!

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.036 seconds with 31 queries.
© 2002-2026 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF