Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: TOSLINK vs. COAX  (Read 2186 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sullen

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 584
TOSLINK vs. COAX
« on: April 09, 2005, 08:22:18 AM »
Probably a real stupid question but i'm new, and i searched and came up with nothing regarding this.


For transfering DAT > 7PIN > Soundcard.

WHich sounds better:
7pin to Optical Toslink cables, or 7pin to Coax cables??

Reason I ask is I've got a 7pin to toslink that came with my recorder.

I havent bought a soundcard yet.

If i get one of the M-Audios with Toslink input, will it be of the same quality using Toslink for output/transfers as using Coax for output/transfers with the same soundcard??

TIA!!!!!
~s
don't > care > to > list > gear > in > signature

Offline JackoRoses

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2836
  • Gender: Male
  • lost cause
Re: TOSLINK vs. COAX
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2005, 08:44:46 AM »
both cables accomplish the same goal, with no difference in sound.
Just different connectors. Coax is a bit more robust then optical.
A optical cable can be broken and introduce diginoise/jitter into the
clone while a coax can do the same the odds are more diminished.
They both sound the same because they both transport 1's and 0's and that
is all.
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/jackoroses
AKG ck61's/ck62's/ck63's/480b's > zaolla's/Dogstar silver cables > optimod V3  > zaolla spdif> HD-P2
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. "
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Big Brother is here and he is watching you.

Offline dklein

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Gender: Male
Re: TOSLINK vs. COAX
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2005, 09:02:15 AM »
A optical cable can be broken and introduce diginoise/jitter into the
clone while a coax can do the same the odds are more diminished.

Jitter isn't really a factor when doing a transfer. More of a DAC playback thing - bit timing to the converter.  In a transfer the arrival time is irrelavent as it all gets written to a file.
KM 184 > V2 > R4
older recording gear: UA-5  / emagic A62 / laptop / JB3 / CSB / AD20 / Sharp MT-90 / Sony MDS-JE510
Playback: Pioneer DV-578 > Lucid DA 9624 >many funny little british boxes > Linn Isobarik PMS

Offline JackoRoses

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2836
  • Gender: Male
  • lost cause
Re: TOSLINK vs. COAX
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2005, 09:24:51 AM »
A optical cable can be broken and introduce diginoise/jitter into the
clone while a coax can do the same the odds are more diminished.

Jitter isn't really a factor when doing a transfer. More of a DAC playback thing - bit timing to the converter.  In a transfer the arrival time is irrelavent as it all gets written to a file.
a broken optical cable can introduce jitter to the sound card
and if the sound card can't lock onto the signal, that would be a problem no?
I agree with you, yet I also always was under the impression a cracked optical cable
can cause the light to refract and in turn create a jitter effect.
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/jackoroses
AKG ck61's/ck62's/ck63's/480b's > zaolla's/Dogstar silver cables > optimod V3  > zaolla spdif> HD-P2
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. "
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Big Brother is here and he is watching you.

Offline caymanreview

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9849
  • Gender: Male
    • shows ive taped  that are in circulation
Re: TOSLINK vs. COAX
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2005, 09:38:25 AM »
damaged optical cables can wreak havoc on the audio. for home use it would be fine, but i wouldnt want to run one in the field unless i had to

hexyjones

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: TOSLINK vs. COAX
« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2005, 02:15:51 PM »
damaged optical cables can wreak havoc on the audio. for home use it would be fine, but i wouldnt want to run one in the field unless i had to

I dont think damaged cables should be used at all...

Offline dklein

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1184
  • Gender: Male
Re: TOSLINK vs. COAX
« Reply #6 on: April 10, 2005, 01:52:34 AM »
[a broken optical cable can introduce jitter to the sound card
and if the sound card can't lock onto the signal, that would be a problem no?
I agree with you, yet I also always was under the impression a cracked optical cable
can cause the light to refract and in turn create a jitter effect.

I don't know that I'd call that jitter. ;)  I think jitter refers to effect of digital clocks (sometimes with other components) to to have very slight timing variations between samples and the resulting effect on a 'streamed' sound - e.g. listening to the output of a DAC.  Delivery of the digital signal with low jitter (low fluctuations) should sound better.
KM 184 > V2 > R4
older recording gear: UA-5  / emagic A62 / laptop / JB3 / CSB / AD20 / Sharp MT-90 / Sony MDS-JE510
Playback: Pioneer DV-578 > Lucid DA 9624 >many funny little british boxes > Linn Isobarik PMS

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.044 seconds with 30 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF