Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: at 4050 MAJOR fluff....  (Read 10699 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ray76

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
at 4050 MAJOR fluff....
« on: June 16, 2005, 09:38:42 PM »
I taped with these tonight for the first time, and honestly, this is the best AUD tape ive heard by me or anyone else so far. Maybe my ears are jacked, but damn these mics sound good.

I had no idea....

Ray

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18873
  • Gender: Male
Re: at 4050 MAJOR fluff....
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2005, 09:48:38 PM »
While I know the AT 4050s are great mics - even though I've never used them myself - remember that your success tonight may not have resulted from the mics alone.  Location, config, venue, sound system, mix, etc. all play a role.  Perhaps everything just came together at once tonight to deliver outstanding results.  I wish it happened more often!  That said, if everything came together but the mics sucked, that would've been the pits.  Great to hear you're digging the 4050s, Ray.

Don't keep us in suspense.  What'd you record?  With what pattern?  Setup in what config?  MP3 sample, perhaps?
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) > Roland R-05

Ray76

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: at 4050 MAJOR fluff....
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2005, 10:11:38 PM »
While I know the AT 4050s are great mics - even though I've never used them myself - remember that your success tonight may not have resulted from the mics alone.  Location, config, venue, sound system, mix, etc. all play a role.  Perhaps everything just came together at once tonight to deliver outstanding results.  I wish it happened more often!  That said, if everything came together but the mics sucked, that would've been the pits.  Great to hear you're digging the 4050s, Ray.

Don't keep us in suspense.  What'd you record?  With what pattern?  Setup in what config?  MP3 sample, perhaps?

I recorded South Dirty, a americana/country supergroup in a suck ass hall with a dumbass soundman.
small hall, I dont know what config(i had to improvise and use the sp c4 shockmounts to hold the at 4050s, fit really well. ) about 7 feet up. pretty much in the center of the room, cardioid pattern . ???i dunno. I will get the sample up tommorow. Honestly at first i thought the tape was the SBD feed, and that the soundman was doing a kickass job, until i heard the sbd tape and it sounded like reverb soaked garbage. maybe the fates were smilin on me, but damn, this sounds good. Samples tommorow, as its 4 am here, and i have to work in , oh, 3 hours....hehe
« Last Edit: June 16, 2005, 10:23:19 PM by BigRay »

Offline BC

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
  • Gender: Male
  • Bongo Bongo
Re: at 4050 MAJOR fluff....
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2005, 10:46:51 PM »
While I know the AT 4050s are great mics - even though I've never used them myself - remember that your success tonight may not have resulted from the mics alone.  Location, config, venue, sound system, mix, etc. all play a role.  Perhaps everything just came together at once tonight to deliver outstanding results.  I wish it happened more often!  That said, if everything came together but the mics sucked, that would've been the pits.  Great to hear you're digging the 4050s, Ray.

Don't keep us in suspense.  What'd you record?  With what pattern?  Setup in what config?  MP3 sample, perhaps?


agreed, whenever I pull a killer recording of a show using a PA system I gotta give props to the sound guy for making it sound so good.
In: DPA4022>V3>Microtracker/D8

Out: Morrison ELAD>Adcom GFA555mkII>Martin Logan Aerius i

Ray76

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: at 4050 MAJOR fluff....
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2005, 10:53:45 PM »
While I know the AT 4050s are great mics - even though I've never used them myself - remember that your success tonight may not have resulted from the mics alone.  Location, config, venue, sound system, mix, etc. all play a role.  Perhaps everything just came together at once tonight to deliver outstanding results.  I wish it happened more often!  That said, if everything came together but the mics sucked, that would've been the pits.  Great to hear you're digging the 4050s, Ray.

Don't keep us in suspense.  What'd you record?  With what pattern?  Setup in what config?  MP3 sample, perhaps?


agreed, whenever I pull a killer recording of a show using a PA system I gotta give props to the sound guy for making it sound so good.

cept this guy sucked balls and everyone said the sound wasnt good at all, including the band, the manager and most of the fans.

Ray


Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18873
  • Gender: Male
Re: at 4050 MAJOR fluff....
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2005, 10:55:49 PM »
cept this guy sucked balls and everyone said the sound wasnt good at all, including the band, the manager and most of the fans.

Except he couldn't have sucked that bad, else your AUD recording of the PA wouldn't have turned out so well!  If the house mix sucks, the greatest mics in the world won't help the recording.
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) > Roland R-05

Ray76

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: at 4050 MAJOR fluff....
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2005, 10:58:11 PM »
cept this guy sucked balls and everyone said the sound wasnt good at all, including the band, the manager and most of the fans.

Except he couldn't have sucked that bad, else your AUD recording of the PA wouldn't have turned out so well!  If the house mix sucks, the greatest mics in the world won't help the recording.

damn brian , youre killing my delusion.  ;) :really_sucks:
bastard !

Offline Unitmonster

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 556
  • taboot taboot
    • List
Re: at 4050 MAJOR fluff....
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2005, 12:42:12 AM »
I've taped 3 shows with AT4050>SX-M2>SBM1 and they smoked (Phish Japan '99).  Again, probably as much to do with the venue and sound as anything, but they're always being listed as SBDs on people's lists.
AT853rx (c,sc,o)> Fostex FR2-LE (Busman T-Mod)

Offline Evil Taper

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2771
  • Gender: Male
  • Going pro...no time for taping now
Re: at 4050 MAJOR fluff....
« Reply #8 on: June 17, 2005, 02:10:46 AM »
Good job Ray!  You also have the 4061s to stealth with too....WACKEN OPEN AIR FESTIVAL '05!!!!!!!!!!  I am considering buying some full size mics in the future...how much do these cost?
Really not very evil at all now...

Ray76

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: at 4050 MAJOR fluff....
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2005, 09:30:10 AM »
Good job Ray!  You also have the 4061s to stealth with too....WACKEN OPEN AIR FESTIVAL '05!!!!!!!!!!  I am considering buying some full size mics in the future...how much do these cost?

they go around 800 a pair.

Ray

marc0789

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: at 4050 MAJOR fluff....
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2005, 09:38:29 AM »
cept this guy sucked balls and everyone said the sound wasnt good at all, including the band, the manager and most of the fans.

Except he couldn't have sucked that bad, else your AUD recording of the PA wouldn't have turned out so well!  If the house mix sucks, the greatest mics in the world won't help the recording.

eh....I disagree a bit. I ran mbhos in THE worst venue I've ever been in, the Rialto in Tucson. Imagine a 1920 vaudeville theatre, which isn't great for rock anyway, and imagine every ounce of upholstery, carpet, seats stripped out, and throw in a cheap ass PA to complete the picture. We struggled for a long time trying to run 4022's, hell we couldn't pull a tape from 10' dfc. Yet the bhos could pull a demonstrably better tape in front of the same pre and a/d. Forgiving mics can make a world of difference, even if the room, pa and foh guy suck nuts.

Ray76

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: at 4050 MAJOR fluff....
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2005, 11:45:30 AM »
cept this guy sucked balls and everyone said the sound wasnt good at all, including the band, the manager and most of the fans.

Except he couldn't have sucked that bad, else your AUD recording of the PA wouldn't have turned out so well!  If the house mix sucks, the greatest mics in the world won't help the recording.

eh....I disagree a bit. I ran mbhos in THE worst venue I've ever been in, the Rialto in Tucson. Imagine a 1920 vaudeville theatre, which isn't great for rock anyway, and imagine every ounce of upholstery, carpet, seats stripped out, and throw in a cheap ass PA to complete the picture. We struggled for a long time trying to run 4022's, hell we couldn't pull a tape from 10' dfc. Yet the bhos could pull a demonstrably better tape in front of the same pre and a/d. Forgiving mics can make a world of difference, even if the room, pa and foh guy suck nuts.

which is what happened last night.
Ray

Offline §†∑∫åµÞ≥¥

  • You can call me Steve.
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7105
  • Gender: Male
Re: at 4050 MAJOR fluff....
« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2005, 12:19:19 PM »
cept this guy sucked balls and everyone said the sound wasnt good at all, including the band, the manager and most of the fans.

Except he couldn't have sucked that bad, else your AUD recording of the PA wouldn't have turned out so well!  If the house mix sucks, the greatest mics in the world won't help the recording.

eh....I disagree a bit. I ran mbhos in THE worst venue I've ever been in, the Rialto in Tucson. Imagine a 1920 vaudeville theatre, which isn't great for rock anyway, and imagine every ounce of upholstery, carpet, seats stripped out, and throw in a cheap ass PA to complete the picture. We struggled for a long time trying to run 4022's, hell we couldn't pull a tape from 10' dfc. Yet the bhos could pull a demonstrably better tape in front of the same pre and a/d. Forgiving mics can make a world of difference, even if the room, pa and foh guy suck nuts.

i agree with marc here.... i've heard some muddy, boomy bad pa's and rooms sound pretty nice on tape. it's shocking, but it happens more often than you'd think. case in point, my Dickey Betts recording from last night. the house sound was horrid.... too much bass drum and no keys in the mix but the tape sound miraculous... much better than what i was hearing last night. the barrymore in madison is another good example where i've heard bad room sound but very nice tapes.

"Absurdity is the only reality." - FZ

LMA recordings
www.nutritionbulk.com

Offline keepongoin

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 5433
  • Gender: Male
Re: at 4050 MAJOR fluff....
« Reply #13 on: June 17, 2005, 12:38:10 PM »
cept this guy sucked balls and everyone said the sound wasnt good at all, including the band, the manager and most of the fans.

Except he couldn't have sucked that bad, else your AUD recording of the PA wouldn't have turned out so well!  If the house mix sucks, the greatest mics in the world won't help the recording.

eh....I disagree a bit. I ran mbhos in THE worst venue I've ever been in, the Rialto in Tucson. Imagine a 1920 vaudeville theatre, which isn't great for rock anyway, and imagine every ounce of upholstery, carpet, seats stripped out, and throw in a cheap ass PA to complete the picture. We struggled for a long time trying to run 4022's, hell we couldn't pull a tape from 10' dfc. Yet the bhos could pull a demonstrably better tape in front of the same pre and a/d. Forgiving mics can make a world of difference, even if the room, pa and foh guy suck nuts.

i agree with marc here.... i've heard some muddy, boomy bad pa's and rooms sound pretty nice on tape. it's shocking, but it happens more often than you'd think. case in point, my Dickey Betts recording from last night. the house sound was horrid.... too much bass drum and no keys in the mix but the tape sound miraculous... much better than what i was hearing last night. the barrymore in madison is another good example where i've heard bad room sound but very nice tapes.



this is because the mics attenuate and accentuate differently than our ears do - so what sounds bad at the time can actually be really good on the recording... not to mention the added coloration by preamps and ADCs that one can have...  I've left many a bar thing that the pull was going to be terrible and came up happier than i thought i would be... of course the opposite has also occured, where I thought I was going to be goldern and upon listening, i found out a had captured crap.
“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross.” Sinclair Lewis: How Fascism Will Come To America (1935)

"Science is facts; just as houses are made of stones, so is science made of facts; but a pile of stones is not a house and a collection of facts is not necessarily science."- Henri Poincare

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/pierce

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18873
  • Gender: Male
Re: at 4050 MAJOR fluff....
« Reply #14 on: June 17, 2005, 12:41:43 PM »
We struggled for a long time trying to run 4022's, hell we couldn't pull a tape from 10' dfc.

What'd you expect, running DPAs?  :P

And fair enough - some mics are more forgiving than others, absolutely true, and this will sometimes result in a recording that sounds better than the room.  Though I'd more likely chalk up the recording turning out better than the room to the difference in the way mics "hear" v. the human hearing, i.e. what keepongoin' said.

of course the opposite has also occured, where I thought I was going to be goldern and upon listening, i found out a had captured crap.

Had this happen to me, recently - thought the Chicago QOTSA performance sounded mighty fine, but the recording sounds pretty poor, IMO, just dull and muffled to my ears.   :-\
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) > Roland R-05

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.071 seconds with 44 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF