Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: nbox vs. mic bodies (cmc6)  (Read 2792 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jdawg

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 664
nbox vs. mic bodies (cmc6)
« on: October 08, 2005, 10:19:22 PM »
If the majority, if not all of my taping is done with a stand and shock mounts, what benefits would I gain by moving to something like the nbox? I understand it's a smaller setup and all and a plus for stealth taping of course. What about value of the equipment, seems a pair of cmc6's go for about the same price as the nbox. Thinking there may be some added benefits that I'm not aware of. Currently I've got a a pair of cmc6/mk4's. Also looking to possibly change the pre/ad in my line up, so I'm looking for suggestions on that as well.

Thanks for any input
« Last Edit: October 08, 2005, 10:22:15 PM by john2525az »

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18872
  • Gender: Male
Re: nbox vs. mic bodies (cmc6)
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2005, 10:26:19 PM »
The CMC6s are mic bodies only - they still require a phantom power source and gain prior to hitting your ADC.  The NBox is more multi-function.  It replaces the mic bodies, provides power to the caps, and adds a fixed amount of gain.  The NBox's fixed gain means you need to have an ADC with variable control over the levels - the NBox may provide too much, in which case you'd attenuate; or it may provide too little gain, in which case you're SOL unless your ADC also adds gain.

IMO the only reason to go with the NBox over the CMC6 bodies is for lots and lots of stealthing activity.  Otherwise, the CMC6 + a good variable gain preamp sound better.
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) > Roland R-05

Offline jdawg

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 664
Re: nbox vs. mic bodies (cmc6)
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2005, 10:56:06 PM »
Hey thanks for the quick feedback, Brian.  Too funny, was just listening to your DMB 7/25/03 show last night!  That thing smokes!

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18872
  • Gender: Male
Re: nbox vs. mic bodies (cmc6)
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2005, 12:21:55 AM »
Hey thanks for the quick feedback, Brian.  Too funny, was just listening to your DMB 7/25/03 show last night!  That thing smokes!

Glad you dig it.  :)  I thought the sound system at RG '03 was a little tinny and bass-shy, but still real pleased with the recordings.  Found out this year that 2003-04 had a different sound engineer than years past, with the previous engineer returning in '05.  Whoever the sound engineer, damn, Del and the boys perform!
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) > Roland R-05

Online Craig T

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4354
    • LMA
Re: nbox vs. mic bodies (cmc6)
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2005, 10:02:36 AM »
The NBox is more multi-function.  It replaces the mic bodies, provides power to the caps, and adds a fixed amount of gain.  The NBox's fixed gain means you need to have an ADC with variable control over the levels - the NBox may provide too much, in which case you'd attenuate; or it may provide too little gain, in which case you're SOL unless your ADC also adds gain.

I believe Nick is now offering a variable-gain option.  I know of at least one variable-gain NBox that was designed to work with a Sonic/Benchmark AD2K.
Schoeps cmc6/4v / Beyer mc950 / Line Audio CM3, OM1 / ADK A51 / Church Audio CA-14
Naiant Tinybox v2.2 / NBox(P) / Church Audio ST9200 / CA-UGLY
Sony PCM-M10 / Zoom F3 / Zoom F6

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.034 seconds with 28 queries.
© 2002-2025 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF